Correlation Between Clinical Signs and High-resolution Manometry Data in Children
NCT ID: NCT03662490
Last Updated: 2018-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-12-31
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Standard esophageal manometry has been replaced since 2000 by high resolution manometry. This one allows a more precise study with a spatio-temporal representation of the esophageal pressure values as well as an easier realization with in particular a better tolerance of the examination which is important in pediatrics.
Over a period of 10 years only a dozen studies were conducted in children. No study to date has evaluated the global place of MHR in current practice in children across all indications.
The indications that lead to the realization of a manometry in children are given by some experts but there is currently no clinical study to define the sensitivities, specificity and predictive values of clinical symptoms leading to the completion of this examination and endoscopic signs found upstream.
In addition, the link between certain underlying conditions and the manometric result has never been evaluated.
II / Objective: The objective of our study is to calculate the sensitivity, the specificity and the predictive values of each clinical and endoscopic sign according to the manometric result found and this by age group. The goal is to better define the predictive signs of the selected manometric diagnoses and therefore the indications to remember in the child.
III / Methodology:
Bi-centric retrospective collection of data on patient records in Marseille and Lille. Collection dates: from 2012 (beginning of high resolution manometry in Marseille and Lille) to December 2016.
The clinical and endoscopic signs selected will be decided a priori by an expert committee consisting of 2 adult gastroenterologists specializing in manometry, 1 pediatrician specialist in manometry, and 3 gastro-pediatricians.
Inclusion Criteria: All minor patients (\<18 years old) referred for 1 st high-resolution manometry (or 2 nd or more examination if performed in the presence of a new symptom).
Number of subjects planned: all the patients who had a manometry (about 300 patients) over the given period
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Normal Values for 3D High Resolution Anorectal Manometry in Children
NCT02236507
3D High Resolution Manometry and Balloon Expulsion Test in Diagnosis of Dyssynergic Defecation in Children
NCT02812836
Comparison of Anorectal Manometry and 3D Manometry in Diagnosis of Functional Disorders in Children
NCT02812823
High-resolution Esophageal Manometry
NCT03415893
Influence of Expiration Lente Prolongée on Gastro-oesophageal Reflux
NCT03341585
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Standard esophageal manometry has been replaced since 2000 by high resolution manometry. This one allows a more precise study with a spatio-temporal representation of the esophageal pressure values as well as an easier realization with in particular a better tolerance of the examination which is important in pediatrics.
Over a period of 10 years only a dozen studies were conducted in children. They focused on the technical aspects of the realization but especially of the interpretation of the examination or on specific pathologies well described: the atresia of the esophagus and achalasia. As a result, no study to date has evaluated the global place of MHR in current practice in children across all indications.
The indications that lead to the realization of a manometry in children are given by some experts but there is currently no clinical study to define the sensitivities, specificity and predictive values of clinical symptoms leading to the completion of this examination and endoscopic signs found upstream.
In addition, the link between certain underlying conditions and the manometric result has never been evaluated.
II / Objective: The objective of our study is to calculate the sensitivity, the specificity and the predictive values of each clinical and endoscopic sign according to the manometric result found and this by age group. The goal is to better define the predictive signs of the selected manometric diagnoses and therefore the indications to remember in the child.
III / Methodology:
Bi-centric retrospective collection of data on patient records in Marseille and Lille. Collection dates: from 2012 (beginning of high resolution manometry in Marseille and Lille) to December 2016.
The clinical and endoscopic signs selected will be decided a priori by an expert committee consisting of 2 adult gastroenterologists specializing in manometry, 1 pediatrician specialist in manometry, and 3 gastro-pediatricians.
Inclusion Criteria: All minor patients (\<18 years old) referred for 1 st high-resolution manometry (or 2 nd or more examination if performed in the presence of a new symptom).
Number of subjects planned: all the patients who had a manometry (about 300 patients) over the given period
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patient
Patient who performed a High resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) for the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorder.
High resolution oesophageal manometry
High resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorder.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High resolution oesophageal manometry
High resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorder.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Referred for 1 st high-resolution manometry (or 2 nd or more examination if performed in front of a new symptom).
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
EMILIE GARRIDO PRADALIE
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
APHM
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille
Marseille, PACA, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-54
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.