Tuberosity Versus Palatal Donor Site for Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Root Coverage Therapy (TOPGRAFT)
NCT ID: NCT03661619
Last Updated: 2018-10-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-31
2020-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Recessions may be associated with thermic or mecanic related pains and increased wear of the roots. It may causes aesthetic prejudice on smiling. It may also complicate prosthetic reconstruction when the volume of tissue are insufficient. A study on a Brazilian population reported that recessions negatively impacted the quality of life in terms of esthetics and root sensitivity.
Many surgical procedures have been created to treat these recessions. Most of them include a gingival graft by mean of a sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. Usually it is harvested in the hard palate. However, the early healing of the palate may be associated with important pain and discomfort. Another harvesting site is the retromolar tuberosity. It seems to be of higher tissular quality and lower healing complications. However its limited volume prevent the harvesting of large graft.
Almost no studies have compared the clinical outcome between palatal and tuberosity graft. A retrospective study of our team reported higher rate of complet root coverage with tuberosity graft versus palatal graft (OR=3,78 IC95%). After this observational study, our work introduce a interventional comparison between the two harvesting sites.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Tuberosity Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06650072
Single Stage Root Coverage for Gingival Recession With or Without Free Gingival Graft
NCT03370042
Periosteal Pedicle Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Gingival Recession
NCT06529640
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of CAF + Mucograft® Compared to CAF Alone in Patients With Gingival Recessions
NCT00902876
ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL PARAMETERS AND LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY FOR THE TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE GENGIVAL RECESSIONS WITH TWO TYPES OF SUBEPITELIAL CONNECTIVE GRAFT: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY
NCT03207971
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be recruited from the consultation of the service of periodontology at Rothschild hospital, Paris, France. All eligible willing participant is included between 2 to 8 weeks before intervention. At that time, data are collected, including periodontal parameters and standardized photographs.
Randomization:
It is performed right before intervention by the operator via CleanWEB. Surgical protocol Both test and control groups will be treated with the same flap design. Patient will receive local anaesthesia at the recession and donor site (articaine hydrochloride 7200 mg/1.8 ml, adrenalin 1800 mcg/1.8 ml).
Envelope technique:
By means of a blade (Bard-Parker 15C; Beckton Dickinson) incision stars in the sulcus of the treated teeth, as tissue thickness permits, sharp dissection is used to form a partial-thickness supraperiosteal envelope extending 3 fo 5 mm internally and apically to areas of recession, undermining intermediate papillae. The supra-periosteal dissection will extend well into the mucosal tissues in order to gain flap mobility. The adjacent papillary tissues will be carefully detached by a full-thickness preparation in their buccal aspect, thus to allow for a coronal displacement of the mobilized buccal soft tissue complex.
In accord with the randomization process, one of the following techniques could be employed.
The donor area in the palate anesthetized by block anesthesia of the grater palatine and nasopalatine nerves with a local anesthetic agent containing epinephrine.
Palate : Single-incision technique In this technique, only a single incision parallel 2mm from the gingival margin is use to access to the donor site for graft harvesting. The angle of the blade is 90 degrees to the bone. After the first incision the blade is angle to approximately 135 degrees, and an undermining preparation toward the median is started within the first incision. With each new movement of the scalpel along the incision line, the angle is further flattened until the blade reaches a nearly parallel position to the bone surface. No vertical incisions are to be made, the goal of this procedure is to create a partial-thickness mucosal flap with a uniform thickness of 1 to 1.5 mm depending in the needs for the recipient site. The underlying CTG is separated from the surrounding connective tissue by making incisions to bone on the mesial, distal sides of the graft. The graft can then be removed by detaching it from the bony surface with a periosteal elevator. Suture of the donor site: crossed and parallel horizontal suspension sutures secure the incision and the donor site.
Tuberosity : Distal wedge technique The procedure starts with two converging incisions perpendicular to the tissue surface and 1.0-1.5 mm deep as far distal to the last molar as possible while remaining within the masticatory mucosa. Then, an undermining partial-thickness incision buccal and palatal up to the mesial surface of the last molar is made. The scalpel is guided successively parallel to the buccal or palatal soft tissue surfaces to yield a partial-thickness flap of uniform thickness throughout. After a supraperiosteal incision is made the wedge-shaped graft is removed from he donor site by sharp dissection. The covering epithelium on the upper part of the graft is consequently removed extraorally. The donor site is closed with an external horizontal mattress suture anchored to the periosteum. Additional single interrupted sutures can be used to completely close the wound.
Graft considerations Care should be taken to avoid graft dehydration from the moment when the graft is taken until the wound from the donor site is closed, so it should be store in a gauze soaked in physiologic saline until further use.
Extra oral modifications in SCTGs is often necessary, a fresh scalpel blade could be used to cut the graft to the desired size and shape and to thin the SCTG as needed, also fat and glandular tissue remnants detected on the graft should be removed.
Graft positioning and suturing The connective tissue graft is place in the created envelope, small parts of the CTG could be left uncovered when necessary to achieve a harmonious line of the gingival margin.
Prior to suturing, the contact points of the affected teeth need to be temporarily splinted with a flowable, light-curing resin material.
Suturing material is a non resorbable suture (Prolène 5.0: Ethicon - Cornelia, Georgia, USA).
Starting at the buccal aspect, the needle is guided through the buccal soft tissue complex approximately 5 mm apical to the tip of the papilla. so the needle will reappear in the base of the palatal papilla area. Consecutively, the needle will be wrapped around the splinted contact region and slid underneath the contact point to re-appear at the palatal side again without pinching any soft tissue. The same procedure is repeated once again, now starting from the palatal aspect.
Thereon the needle will be led over and placed underneath the contact point to re-appear at the buccal aspect again without pinching any soft tissue
Post-surgical protocol Patients have to avoid mechanical trauma or tooth brushing in the surgical sites for two weeks. Chlorhexidine rises are prescribed three times per day for two weeks. Two weeks after the surgery patients are instructed to mechanical tooth cleaning with a soft brush.
Following this, regular tooth brushing habits are resumed and chlorhexidine rinses discontinued.
Standardized photograph are also performed.
Follow up visit Supportive care are provided at 6 and 12 months. Data including periodontal parameters and standardized photographs are collected at the 6 months visit and at the12 months visit by an investigator different from the operator.
This is the last visit of the study. Further supportive care are normally provided at the hospital.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Envelope technique + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palatal for root coverage procedure
Sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palatal for root coverage procedure
Envelope technique + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palatal for root coverage procedure
Test Group
Envelope technique + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the tuberosity for root coverage procedure
Sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the tuberosity for root coverage procedure
Envelope technique + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the tuberosity for root coverage procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palatal for root coverage procedure
Envelope technique + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palatal for root coverage procedure
Sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the tuberosity for root coverage procedure
Envelope technique + sub-epithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the tuberosity for root coverage procedure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients must be in good general health without any systemic diseases.
3. Presence of buccal gingival recession (Miller's Class I and II) \>2 mm.
4. Identifiable cemento-enamel junction.
5. The tooth with a gingival recession is a vital tooth.
6. Accessible tuberosity.
7. Plaque Index and Gingival bleeding index less than 20%.
8. Use an atraumatic dental brushing technique.
9. Provide signed and dated informed consent form.
10. Social health insurance.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prosthetic crown, restoration or tooth decay involving the CEJ
3. Previous periodontal plastic surgery in the area
4. Smokers up to 10 per day.
5. Patient with untreated periodontal disease.
6. Presence of clinical signs of active periodontal disease
7. Known pregnancy in progress
8. Contraindication to surgery
9. Patient deprived of liberty or under legal protection measure.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe BOUCHARD, PU-PH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
K171206J
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.