Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-27
2021-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft in Subjects With Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers
NCT02818972
Phase II Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Relay Thoracic Stent-Graft
NCT01327742
Phase II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Relay Thoracic Stent-Graft
NCT00435942
LC Bead LUMI for Prostatic Artery Embolization
NCT03372096
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of IBS Angel in Patients With Pulmonary Artery Stenosis
NCT04973540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Self-expandable metal stents, plastic stents and biodegradable stents are also used in that indication. In a meta-analysis of 18 studies with 444 patients, clinical success was achieved in 41 percent of patients. Stent migration occurred in 29 percent of patients, and adverse events occurred in 21 percent.
A self-expending nitinol stent has been design to reduce the migration risk. The stent is partially covered on both extremities, allowing the formation of small hyperplasia in the middle part of the stent. This design with the inner sheet (usually, when using fully covered stents, the sheet is outside) allows formation of hyperplasia (therefore reducing the risk of migration) but partly controlled by the inner sheet to reduce the risk of lumen occlusion. By this design, the balance between hyperplasia formation to avoid the risk of migration and reducing the risk of lumen occlusion could be entailed stable esophageal calibration.
The UAS-RBS system is a reversible procedure to treat Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures through stent implantation. Above standard of care monitoring, safety assessment of the procedure and device performance decreases the risk and unforeseen events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation)
Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation) at J0, removal after 6 months and follow-up for 6 months
Esophageal stent implantation
An upper endoscopy will be performed with the use of fluoroscopy. Depending on the size of the stricture a dilation can be performed prior to the stent deployment. Otherwise, the stent will be deployed over a guidewire, under fluoroscopy.
After, the gastroscopy will go through the esophagus to check for the stent deployment, or any complications.
An injection of contrast agent will be done to be sure of the correct positioning and that no complications was happened.
The patient will be kept overnight, with liquid food for 3 days and under PPI until one month after the stent placement.
Stent removal
Six months after implantation, the removal of the stent will be performed. Patient will undergo a first endoscopy under general anesthesia for the placement of a FCSEMS. Then, depending on the importance of the hyperplasia, removal of both stents, under general anesthesia, will be done after 7 to 10 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Esophageal stent implantation
An upper endoscopy will be performed with the use of fluoroscopy. Depending on the size of the stricture a dilation can be performed prior to the stent deployment. Otherwise, the stent will be deployed over a guidewire, under fluoroscopy.
After, the gastroscopy will go through the esophagus to check for the stent deployment, or any complications.
An injection of contrast agent will be done to be sure of the correct positioning and that no complications was happened.
The patient will be kept overnight, with liquid food for 3 days and under PPI until one month after the stent placement.
Stent removal
Six months after implantation, the removal of the stent will be performed. Patient will undergo a first endoscopy under general anesthesia for the placement of a FCSEMS. Then, depending on the importance of the hyperplasia, removal of both stents, under general anesthesia, will be done after 7 to 10 days.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* More than two dilations to at least 16 mm in diameter with symptoms relapse within 6 months.
* Last dilation to 16 mm no more than 6 months before study procedure.
* Dysphagia score of 2 (ability to swallow semi-solid foods), 3 (ability to swallow liquids only) or 4 (unable to swallow liquids) at the time of measurement.
* Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Dysphagia related to motility disorder.
* Planned adjuvant radiation therapy post esophagectomy.
* Esophageal stent in place.
* Active erosive esophagitis.
* Sensitivity to any components of the stent or delivery system.
* Concurrent medical condition that would affect the investigator's ability to evaluate the patient's condition or could compromise patient safety.
* Currently enrolled in another clinical trial.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasme University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CUB Hopital erasme
Anderlecht, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P2017/543
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.