Pain Relief in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Using HeatTens vs. Standard Care.
NCT ID: NCT03643731
Last Updated: 2019-09-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-29
2019-08-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Secondary Prevention in Patients With Recurrent Low Back Pain
NCT03852667
Pain Detecting and Analgesic Stimulating Device on Low Back Pain
NCT02256410
Unraveling Back Pain Chronicity: an EMG and EEG Study
NCT03705676
Effect of Thermal Therapy and Exercises on Acute Low Back Pain
NCT03986047
Assessment of Usability and Satisfaction With a Take-home Device Presenting Sound and Body Stimulation for Back Pain
NCT06619418
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If subjects drop out, due to any kind of reason, a new participant will be included in order to obtain the predetermined number of participants. Data collected from the participant that dropped out will be deleted and not taken into account in the further analysis.
Analysis of the samples:
Sample size is based on data from (Dailey et al. 2013). Researchers found a significant difference in the reduction of movement-evoked pain (pain during the 6 minutes' walk test (6MWT)) ((4.0 ± 2.5) on a 0-10 VAS) when compared to no TENS (5.0 ± 2.6) (p\<0.05) in patients with primary fibromyalgia.
In this study the response within each subject group was normally distributed. If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 1.0, effect size is calculated to be 0,2 (by means of G\*Power version 3.1.9.3). 29 experimental subjects and 29 control subjects need to be included to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 0.8. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05. To take into account a 15% loss of data sample size is inflated up to 33 per group (n/0.85). Sample size is augmented by 10% per potential confounding factor (i.e. age and sex). The total sample size to be recruited will be 70 subjects.
Statistical analysis:
The person to conduct the statistical analyses will be Lynn Leemans (Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel).
An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed so that the integrity of the randomization is ensured. Normality will be checked via the Shapiro-Wilk test.
To ensure good balance of participant characteristics in each group at baseline, stratification is used. Changes in differences between both treatment groups after the intervention period (at 4w) will be analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA for the following variables: sensitivity to movement-evoked pain, quality of life, pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation.
If the modulus of the partial correlation of potential confounding factors age and sex with the primary outcome values equals minimum 0.3, these covariates of prognostic values will be added as covariates in the ANOVA model.
As a secondary analysis, a linear regression analysis will be used with the following dependent factors: BMI, and as independent factors: sensitivity to movement-evoked pain, pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation, fear avoidance beliefs and quality of life.
Significance value for all tests will be set at p \< 0.05. All analyses will be performed using SPSS 20 for Mac.
Quality control and quality assurance:
All electronic data will be stored on the shared drive of a university computer, which is encrypted; and on a password protected laptop belonging to the principal researcher (Lynn Leemans). Transfer of data will only be done if essential.
All anonymised data will be stored for up to four years to allow for access before publication, and may be required at a later date for further analysis and auditing. All personal data, including health questionnaires and signed consent forms, will be destroyed within 12 months of the study finishing.
Publication policy:
Both parties (VUB and Omron) acknowledge the importance of public disclosure of information collected of generated because of this clinical study. Omron retains the ability before publication to verify and ensure correct and accurate information is represented of the product and the brand used (product names, product types, brand name, product code) with no influence of the scientific results and conclusions of the integrity of the publication.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HeatTens
After baseline measurements and during 4 weeks of follow up
Composition and dosing of the device:
HeatTens (HV-F311-E) 2 - 108 Hz (modulation), 100 microsec (pulse duration) for 30 minutes.
HeatTens (HV-F311-E)
Patients need to apply the device during 30 minutes.
Control group
No intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HeatTens (HV-F311-E)
Patients need to apply the device during 30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* severe underlying comorbidity (like diagnosed diabetes, cardiovascular problems, etc.),
* pregnant or given birth in the preceding year,
* having initiated a new LBP treatment in the 6 weeks prior to study participation
25 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lynn Leemans
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Beckwée, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Brussels, Jette, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Leemans L, Elma O, Nijs J, Wideman TH, Siffain C, den Bandt H, Van Laere S, Beckwee D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and heat to reduce pain in a chronic low back pain population: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B.U.N. 143201836092
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.