Spironolactone Versus Indapamide in Obese and Hypertensive Patients

NCT ID: NCT03626506

Last Updated: 2019-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-13

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Most recent guidelines continue to recommend thiazide diuretics as first-line agents for patients with hypertension in spite of the potential metabolic side effects, while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), such as spironolactone or eplerenone, are mainly recommended to be used in patients with resistant hypertension or heart failure.However,animal studies demonstrated that MRAs induce beneficial changes in left ventricular remodeling and prevent or partially reverse cardiac fibrosis and pathological hypertrophy that contribute to the development of diastolic heart failure. MRAs have also been shown to decrease inflammation and myocardial fibrosis in patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. In the proposed study, the investigators planned to randomize 400 patients with essential hypertension and increased waist circumference to receive spironolactone or indapamide in combination with amlodipine for 12 months. The effects of the two diuretics on target organ damage detected by changes in left atrial volume index(LAVI) by echocardiography reflecting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or changes in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity(PWV) reflecting arterial stiffness will be compared. The potential role of MRAs as initial therapy for patients with essential hypertension and visceral obesity will be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thiazide diuretics have been widely used for the management of essential hypertension, especially in patients with salt-sensitive hypertension. Most recent guidelines continue to recommend thiazide diuretics as first-line agents for all patients with hypertension in spite of the potential metabolic side effects such as hypokalemia, hypertriglyceridemia, impaired glucose tolerance and increases in serum cholesterol and uric acid. However, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), such as spironolactone or eplerenone, are mainly recommended to be used in patients with resistant hypertension or heart failure because they have never been evaluated for efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in uncomplicated patients with hypertension. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that MRAs reduced total mortality or cardiovascular death in patients with systolic heart failure with severe or mild symptoms and in patients undergoing hemodialysis for chronic renal dysfunction. Animal studies demonstrated that MRAs induce beneficial changes in left ventricular remodeling and prevent or partially reverse cardiac fibrosis and pathological hypertrophy that contribute to the development of diastolic heart failure. MRAs have also been shown to decrease inflammation and myocardial fibrosis in patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Of interest is the recent finding in EMPHASIS-HF study in which almost all of the benefit of eplerenone was found in those patients with an increased waist circumference. Therefore, the investigators have reason to believe that MRAs will be more effective than thiazide diuretics in preventing target organ damage and can be used initially in patients with essential hypertension and visceral obesity. In the proposed study, the investigators planned to randomize 400 patients with essential hypertension and increased waist circumference to receive spironolactone or indapamide in combination with amlodipine for 12 months. The effects of the two diuretics on target organ damage detected by changes in left atrial volume index(LAVI) by echocardiography reflecting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or changes in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity(PWV) reflecting arterial stiffness will be compared. If it proves that spironolactone as first-line antihypertensive medication is more effective than indapamide in target organ protection, the investigators would propose a large scale cardiovascular outcome trial to evaluate cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension and visceral obesity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized, controlled, open-label trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

spironolactone

Subjects will take spironolactone 20\~40mg once daily on top of amlodipine 5\~10mg once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spironolactone

Intervention Type DRUG

After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will take spironolactone 20mg once daily on top of amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, spironolactone can be titrated to 40mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

Amlodipine

Intervention Type DRUG

After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine 5mg once daily, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will be randomized to add spironolactone 20mg once daily or extended-release indapamide 1.5mg once daily to amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, amlodipine can be titrated to 10mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

indapamide

Subjects will take indapamide 1.5\~3.0mg once daily on top of amlodipine 5\~10mg once daily.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Indapamide

Intervention Type DRUG

After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will take extended-release indapamide 1.5mg once daily on top of amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, indapamide can be titrated to 3mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

Amlodipine

Intervention Type DRUG

After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine 5mg once daily, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will be randomized to add spironolactone 20mg once daily or extended-release indapamide 1.5mg once daily to amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, amlodipine can be titrated to 10mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spironolactone

After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will take spironolactone 20mg once daily on top of amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, spironolactone can be titrated to 40mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Indapamide

After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will take extended-release indapamide 1.5mg once daily on top of amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, indapamide can be titrated to 3mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Amlodipine

After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine 5mg once daily, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will be randomized to add spironolactone 20mg once daily or extended-release indapamide 1.5mg once daily to amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, amlodipine can be titrated to 10mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with essential hypertension aged between 18-80years
2. Office systolic blood pressure (SBP)≥140mmHg and \<180mmHg without treatment or on one antihypertensive drug or SBP\<140mmHg on two antihypertensive drugs
3. Waist circumference ≥90cm for males, ≥ 80cm for females

Exclusion Criteria

1. Secondary hypertension.
2. Symptomatic congestive heart failure or history of heart failure.
3. History of ischemic stroke, unstable angina or myocardial infarction;
4. Atrial fibrillation
5. Serum creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dl or eGFR≤ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2
6. Serum K+ ≥ 5.0 mmol/L or ≤3.5 mmol/L
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wang Guisong, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University Third Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Guisong Wang, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-13701070359

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Guisong Wang, MD

Role: primary

86-13701070359

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BMUJI007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Diuretic Comparison Project
NCT02185417 COMPLETED PHASE3
Aldosterone Blockade in Heart Failure
NCT00523757 COMPLETED PHASE3