Comparison of Single and Combination Diuretics in Low-Renin Hypertension

NCT ID: NCT02351973

Last Updated: 2015-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

423 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the routine combination of optimal thiazide and K+-sparing diuretic will both increase efficacy of BP reduction and reduce risk of glucose intolerance; and whether K+-sparing diuretics alone may have a neutral or even beneficial effect upon glucose tolerance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A major attraction of K+-sparing diuretics may be the absence of risk of new-onset diabetes (DM). Since they have not been compared in hypertension outcome trials, and DM has not been an endpoint in heart failure studies of spironolactone or eplerenone, we do not know for certain whether they are clean in this respect. Short-term studies suggest they are.49 Interestingly in INSIGHT there was no excess of DM in patients receiving HCTZ 25mg, which was combined with amiloride 2.5mg, but increased by 30% in patients on HCTZ/amiloride 50/5mg.44 In the proposed study we shall use the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to provide an endpoint for each subject. This strategy has recently been employed to demonstrate a difference after just 12 weeks of dosing with a thiazide diuretic50. Hyperkalaemia has been the traditional concern about K+-sparing diuretics. We expect to demonstrate that in patients with eGFR ≥45, the risk of hyperkalaemia is nullified by combination with a thiazide. Instead then of amiloride being used mainly in trace doses to balance the hypokalaemia of thiazides, practice might reverse to thinking of thaizides as the "partner" used to negate risk of hyperkalaemia.

The challenge to designing this study is to compare several options among the diuretics while achieving clear cut answers to:

1. the comparison of combination with single diuretics and
2. the comparison of K+-sparing diuretics with thiazide.

A study of sufficient duration to establish efficacy and tolerability (especially upon glucose tolerance) cannot be crossover in design and therefore requires a large number of subjects to compare the options. In order to maximize recruitment whilst also maximizing sensitivity to detect changes in OGTT, we will open the trial to most of those patients with hypertension in whom diuretic is a reasonable next option, providing they have one feature of the metabolic syndrome - additional to hypertension.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hydrochlorthiazide

Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) ATC class: C03AA03 Form: Tablet Dose range: Phase 1: 25mg (2 x 12.5mg tablet) Phase 2: 50mg (4 x 12.5mg tablet) Maximum allowed dose: 50mg Administration: oral

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hydrochlorthiazide

Intervention Type DRUG

HCTZ 25mg to 50mg All drugs will be provided in an acceptable container where the active agent is not identified on the drug label.

In Phase 1 (weeks 0-12) patients will have 1 tablet from each of 2 bottles. These will contain either a) HCTZ 12.5mg in both bottles; b) amiloride 5mg in both bottles; OR c) one bottle of each.

In Phase 2 (weeks13-24) patients will take 2 tablets from each of 2 bottles. These bottles will have the same contents as in Phase 1, except that the number of tablets will be twice as many.

Amiloride

Amiloride ATC class: C03DB01 Form: Tablet Dose range: Phase 1: 10mg (2 x 5mg tablet) Phase 2: 20mg (4 x 5mg tablet) Maximum allowed dose: 20mg Administration: oral

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Amiloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Amiloride 10mg to 20mg All drugs will be provided in an acceptable container where the active agent is not identified on the drug label.

In Phase 1 (weeks 0-12) patients will have 1 tablet from each of 2 bottles. These will contain either a) HCTZ 12.5mg in both bottles; b) amiloride 5mg in both bottles; OR c) one bottle of each.

In Phase 2 (weeks13-24) patients will take 2 tablets from each of 2 bottles. These bottles will have the same contents as in Phase 1, except that the number of tablets will be twice as many.

Hydrochlorthiazide and Amiloride

Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) + Amiloride Form: Tablets (separate tablet of each drug) Dose range: Phase 1: HCTZ 12.5mg (1 tablet) + Amiloride 5mg (1 tablet) Phase 2: HCTZ 25mg (2 x 12.5mg tablet) + Amiloride 10mg (2 x 5mg tablet) Maximum allowed dose: HCTZ 25mg/ Amiloride 10mg Administration: oral

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hydrochlorthiazide and Amiloride

Intervention Type DRUG

HCTZ 12.5 to 25mg \& + Amiloride 5mg to 10mg All drugs will be provided in an acceptable container where the active agent is not identified on the drug label.

In Phase 1 (weeks 0-12) patients will have 1 tablet from each of 2 bottles. These will contain either a) HCTZ 12.5mg in both bottles; b) amiloride 5mg in both bottles; OR c) one bottle of each.

In Phase 2 (weeks13-24) patients will take 2 tablets from each of 2 bottles. These bottles will have the same contents as in Phase 1, except that the number of tablets will be twice as many.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hydrochlorthiazide

HCTZ 25mg to 50mg All drugs will be provided in an acceptable container where the active agent is not identified on the drug label.

In Phase 1 (weeks 0-12) patients will have 1 tablet from each of 2 bottles. These will contain either a) HCTZ 12.5mg in both bottles; b) amiloride 5mg in both bottles; OR c) one bottle of each.

In Phase 2 (weeks13-24) patients will take 2 tablets from each of 2 bottles. These bottles will have the same contents as in Phase 1, except that the number of tablets will be twice as many.

Intervention Type DRUG

Amiloride

Amiloride 10mg to 20mg All drugs will be provided in an acceptable container where the active agent is not identified on the drug label.

In Phase 1 (weeks 0-12) patients will have 1 tablet from each of 2 bottles. These will contain either a) HCTZ 12.5mg in both bottles; b) amiloride 5mg in both bottles; OR c) one bottle of each.

In Phase 2 (weeks13-24) patients will take 2 tablets from each of 2 bottles. These bottles will have the same contents as in Phase 1, except that the number of tablets will be twice as many.

Intervention Type DRUG

Hydrochlorthiazide and Amiloride

HCTZ 12.5 to 25mg \& + Amiloride 5mg to 10mg All drugs will be provided in an acceptable container where the active agent is not identified on the drug label.

In Phase 1 (weeks 0-12) patients will have 1 tablet from each of 2 bottles. These will contain either a) HCTZ 12.5mg in both bottles; b) amiloride 5mg in both bottles; OR c) one bottle of each.

In Phase 2 (weeks13-24) patients will take 2 tablets from each of 2 bottles. These bottles will have the same contents as in Phase 1, except that the number of tablets will be twice as many.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients can proceed to placebo run-in if biochemical data available from previous 6 months, but cannot proceed to randomised treatment if eligibility not confirmed by baseline sample:

1. Age 18-80
2. Diagnosis of hypertension according to BHS criteria
3. Systolic BP on permitted background treatment ≥ 140 mmHg and home BP ≥ 130mmHg. Patients may be included if the PI anticipates BP criteria for inclusion will be met at randomisation
4. Indication for diuretic treatment:

* Untreated + (age\>55 AND/OR Black AND/OR renin\<12mU/L)
* receiving one or any permutation of the following: \*ACEi, ARB, β-blocker, CCB, direct renin inhibitor
5. At least one other component (i.e. additional to hypertension) of the metabolic syndrome (reduced HDL, raised triglycerides, glucose, waist circumference)\* \* Definition of Metabolic Syndrome according to the International Diabetes Federation, 2006: Central obesity (waist circumference \> 94cm male (\>90 if Asian), \> 80 female plus two of:

* SBP ≥ 130 or DBP ≥ 85 mmHg
* Fasting glucose \>5.6mmol/l
* Fasting Triglycerides \> 1.7 mmol/l (or on rx)
* HDL \< 1.03 mmol/l males, \< 1.29 mmol/l females (or on rx)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Diabetes (types 1 or 2)
2. Secondary hypertension
3. eGFR \< 45 mls/min
4. Plasma K+ outside normal range on two successive measurements during screening
5. Clinic SBP \>200 mmHg or DBP \>120mmHg, with PI discretion to override if home BP's lower
6. Requirement for diuretic therapy (other than for hypertension)
7. Absolute contra-indications to any of the study drugs
8. Current therapy for cancer
9. Anticipation of change in medical status planned surgical intervention requiring \>2 weeks convalescence, actual or planned pregnancy)
10. Inability to give informed consent
11. Not on stable doses of all hypertensive medications to be continued throughout the study for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to randomisation, or not normally less than 2 weeks if early randomisation is required at the discretion of the PI.
12. Participation in a clinical study involving an investigational drug/device within 4 weeks of screening.
13. Any concomitant condition that may adversely affect the safety and/or efficacy of the study drug or severely limit the subject's lifespan or ability to complete the study
14. Treatment with any of the following prohibited medications:

* Oral corticosteroids within 3 months of Screening and prohibited during study participation.
* Chronic stable or unstable use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs other than acetylsalicylic acid is prohibited. Chronic use is defined as \>3 consecutive or nonconsecutive days of treatment per week. intermittent use of NSAIDs is strongly discouraged throughout the duration of this study. If intermittent treatment is required, NSAIDs must not be used for more than a total of 2 days. For all subjects requiring analgesic or anti-pyretic agents, the use of paracetamol is recommended during study participation.
* The use of short-acting oral nitrates (eg, sublingual nitroglycerin) is permitted; however, subjects should not take short-acting oral nitrates within 4 hours of Screening or any subsequent study visit.
* The use of long-acting oral nitrates is permitted; however, the dose must be stable for at least 2 weeks prior to screening/ randomisation.
* Use of sympathomimetic decongestants is permitted; but, not within 1 week prior to screening or randomisation. or within 1 day prior to study visits;
* The use of theophylline is permitted; however, the dose must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening and throughout study participation.
* The use of phosphodiesterase (PDE) type V inhibitors is permitted; however, subjects must refrain from taking these medications within 1 day of Screening or any subsequent study visit.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Leicester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Dundee

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Glasgow

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Edinburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Barts & The London NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Cambridge

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Morris Brown

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Professor MJ Brown

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cambridge University and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Box 110, Level 3 ACCI, Addenbrookes Hospital

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

NICE/BHS. CG34 Hypertension - NICE guideline (all the recommendations). http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG34/niceguidance /pdf/english 2006

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Dickerson JE, Hingorani AD, Ashby MJ, Palmer CR, Brown MJ. Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes. Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2008-13. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07614-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10376615 (View on PubMed)

Deary AJ, Schumann AL, Murfet H, Haydock SF, Foo RS, Brown MJ. Double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover comparison of five classes of antihypertensive drugs. J Hypertens. 2002 Apr;20(4):771-7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200204000-00037.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11910315 (View on PubMed)

Taler SJ, Textor SC, Augustine JE. Resistant hypertension: comparing hemodynamic management to specialist care. Hypertension. 2002 May;39(5):982-8. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000016176.16042.2f.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12019280 (View on PubMed)

Kaplan NM. Resistant hypertension. J Hypertens. 2005 Aug;23(8):1441-4. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000174968.72212.ac.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16003165 (View on PubMed)

Black HR, Keck M, Meredith P, Bullen K, Quinn S, Koren A. Controlled-release doxazosin as combination therapy in hypertension: the GATES study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Mar;8(3):159-66; quiz 167-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.04811.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16522992 (View on PubMed)

Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1427. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1427.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12829555 (View on PubMed)

Brown MJ, Cruickshank JK, Dominiczak AF, MacGregor GA, Poulter NR, Russell GI, Thom S, Williams B; Executive Committee, British Hypertension Society. Better blood pressure control: how to combine drugs. J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Feb;17(2):81-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001511.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12574784 (View on PubMed)

Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, de Leeuw PW, Mancia G, Rosenthal T, Ruilope LM. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet. 2000 Jul 29;356(9227):366-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02527-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10972368 (View on PubMed)

Ramsay LE, Yeo WW, Jackson PR. Diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance with diuretics. Eur Heart J. 1992 Dec;13 Suppl G:68-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/13.suppl_g.68.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1486909 (View on PubMed)

Bakris G, Molitch M, Hewkin A, Kipnes M, Sarafidis P, Fakouhi K, Bacher P, Sowers J; STAR Investigators. Differences in glucose tolerance between fixed-dose antihypertensive drug combinations in people with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2592-7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1373.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17130190 (View on PubMed)

Brown MJ, Williams B, MacDonald TM, Caulfield M, Cruickshank JK, McInnes G, Sever P, Webb DJ, Salsbury J, Morant S, Ford I. Comparison of single and combination diuretics on glucose tolerance (PATHWAY-3): protocol for a randomised double-blind trial in patients with essential hypertension. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 7;5(8):e008086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008086.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26253567 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-010068-41

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UKCRN 4501

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Diuretic Comparison Project
NCT02185417 COMPLETED PHASE3