Reliability of Functional Outcome Measures in Neurofibromatosis 2
NCT ID: NCT03617276
Last Updated: 2018-08-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-09-07
2017-05-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reliability of Functional Outcome Measures in Neurofibromatosis 1
NCT02479360
Reliability of Functional Outcome Measures in Neurofibromatosis 1: Test- Retest
NCT05186870
Transformation of Plexiform Neurofibromas to Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Neurofibromatosis Type 1
NCT02211768
Using Positron Emission Tomography to Predict Intracranial Tumor Growth in Neurofibromatosis Type II Patients
NCT01222728
Developing Biomarkers of Plexiform Tumor Burden in Patients With Neurofibromatosis-Type 1
NCT05238909
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The complications of NF2 can lead to varied difficulties with activities of daily living and may impair quality of life. More recently, new pharmacological treatments for NF2 are being trialed which may have the potential to dramatically influence quality of life for people with NF2. Currently, evaluation of treatment effect in NF2 is based on a clinician's neurological assessment and imaging. However, imaging results do not always correlate with clinical and reported functional changes of the individual. Therefore, evaluating the effect of interventions or treatment should include the evaluation of a person's function using standardised outcome measures. The findings from this study will improve the care of people with NF2 by ensuring that we are able to measure functional changes in a person with NF2 with greater confidence, meaning that we can start, continue or cease treatments based on the holistic picture of an individual.
The world confederation of physiotherapists (WCPT) stipulates that standardised outcome measures (SOM) are used to provide a quantitative measure of capability, and to evaluate the impact of treatment on function. There are a wide range of SOM's that evaluate function so a SOM is chosen by the clinician based on the patient's presenting functional difficulty and the scientific credibility of the SOM. Scientific credibility (robustness) is based on scientific properties of the SOM i.e. how stable the SOM is (reliability) and whether it assesses what it is intending to assess (validity). It is important to evaluate each SOM within the target population as variability within that condition, strongly influences the SOM's reliability and validity (de Vel 2011).
At present, functional SOM's have limited scientific and subsequent clinical credibility when used in people with NF2 because their scientific properties have not yet been evaluated within this patient group which means that if they are used clinically or within research, there is an inherent element of doubt when interpreting the SOM's results. The objective of this research team is to create a core set of functional SOM's which have undergone rigorous scientific evaluation so that they can be used in the future for clinical practice and for research purposes in adults with NF2.
This study primarily aims to evaluate three commonly used SOM's for reliability in adults with NF2 (over 16 years of age). The measures chosen for evaluation are the nine hole peg test, the four square step test and the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance (mCTSIB). Interrater reliability (the test result remains the same when reviewed by different people) and intrarater reliability (the test result remains stable when reviewed twice by the same tester) will be evaluated. From this data, we will be able to calculate the standard error of measurement an additional important scientific characteristics of SOM evaluation. A secondary objective is to correlate SOM objective markers with a subjective disease specific quality of life measure (NFTI-QOL) and self-reported falls rate and near misses. We will also collect data on dynamic visual acuity in this patient group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Outcome measurement
Each participant will be asked to complete each standardised outcome measure (SOM) three times and each trial will be videotaped by the researcher. The selected SOM's are the modified nine-hole peg test, the four square step test and the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance. A doctor will watch the video on 2 separate occasions to evaluate intra-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability will be assessed through asking three other neurofibromatosis specialist professionals (two NF2 consultants and one NF2 specialist nurse) to review the video and to score each measure completed. Once the filmed sessions have been analysed by the relevant clinician's the data will be destroyed in line with Trust policy. Each participant will also be required to complete the INFI-QOL questionnaire, the dynamic visual acuity test and provide information about the number of falls/near misses they have had over the past 12 months
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neurofibromatosis Unit, Guys Hospital.
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16/NW/0504
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.