Reliability of Functional Outcome Measures in Neurofibromatosis 1
NCT ID: NCT02479360
Last Updated: 2015-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
49 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-06-30
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reliability of Functional Outcome Measures in Neurofibromatosis 1: Test- Retest
NCT05186870
Reliability of Functional Outcome Measures in Neurofibromatosis 2
NCT03617276
A Retrospective Study on Epidemiological Characteristics of Chinese NF1 Patients in Real World (PROMISE)
NCT06379230
Transformation of Plexiform Neurofibromas to Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Neurofibromatosis Type 1
NCT02211768
Developing Biomarkers of Plexiform Tumor Burden in Patients With Neurofibromatosis-Type 1
NCT05238909
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The world confederation of physiotherapists (WCPT) stipulates that standardised outcome measures (SOM) are used to provide a quantitative measure of capability, and to evaluate the impact of treatment on function. There are a wide range of SOM's that evaluate function (e.g. walking, standing from a chair, use of hands) so a SOM is chosen by the clinician based on the patient's presenting functional difficulty and the scientific credibility of the SOM. Scientific credibility (robustness) is based on scientific properties of the SOM i.e. how stable the SOM is (reliability) and whether it assesses what it is intending to assess (validity). It is important to evaluate each SOM within the target population as variability within that condition, strongly influences the SOM's reliability and validity (de Vel 2011).
At present, functional SOM's have limited scientific and subsequent clinical credibility when used in people with NF1 because their scientific properties have not yet been evaluated within this patient group which means that if they are used clinically or within research, there is an inherent element of doubt when interpreting the SOM's results. The objective of this research team is to create a core set of functional SOM's which have undergone rigorous scientific evaluation so that they can be used in the future for clinical practice and for research purposes in adults with NF1.
This study aims to evaluate four commonly used SOM's for reliability in adults with NF1 (over 16 years of age). The measures chosen for evaluation are the 10 metre walk test, the timed up and go test, the functional reach test and the nine hole peg test. Interrater reliability (the test result remains the same when reviewed by different people) and intrarater reliability (the test result remains stable when reviewed twice by the same tester) will be evaluated. From this data, we will be able to calculate the standard error of measurement an additional important scientific characteristics of SOM evaluation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Outcome measurement
Each participant will be asked to complete each standardised outcome measure (SOM) three times and each trial will be videotaped by the researcher. The selected SOM's are the 10 metre walk test, the timed up and go test, the functional reach test and the nine-hole peg test. A physiotherapist will watch the video on 2 separate occasions to evaluate intra-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability will be assessed through asking three other neurofibromatosis specialist professionals (two NF1 consultants and one NF1 specialist nurse) to review the video and to score each measure completed. Once the filmed sessions have been analysed by the relevant clinician's the data will be destroyed in line with Trust policy.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to walk more than 10 metres without physical assistance (may use walking aids)
* Patients who attend the national NF1 service at GSTT
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neurofibromatosis Unit, Guys Hospital.
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RJ115/N174
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.