Gait Mate: Examining Neural Networks Engaged During Lower Extremity Movement in the MRI
NCT ID: NCT03604367
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
21 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-01
2019-06-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
GaitBetter: Motor and Cognitive Training for Gait Rehabilitation and Falls Prevention in Stroke Survivors.
NCT04625127
Gait Recovery After Stroke
NCT06806748
Robot-Assisted Gait Training With Self-Observation in Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT06476327
The Effectiveness of Exoskeleton Type Robotic Gait Training Using CIMT for Lower Extremity: in the Aspect of Gait Independence and Balance
NCT04649684
Informative of Surface Electromyography and Prognostic Factors in Assessing the Recovery of Balance and Gait After Stroke
NCT04981184
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The rigor and reproducibility will be evaluated by comparing the results of 1) active movement -Bipedal with 2) active movement -unipedal 4 and 3) imagined movement.
Dependent measures include: 1) head motion during the fMRI task, 2) BOLD signal in the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortex during the fMRI task, 3) force applied during the fMRI task, and 4) participant feedback using a modified version of the Presence Questionnaire (a standard tool to assess ecological validity of virtual environments.
Each Aim has a development and evaluation aspect. Through this 1 year proposal the investigators will determine if the bipedal fMRI protocol (active movement) is able to engage neural networks more robustly (e.g. greater effect size) than bipedal imagery alone in Healthy Volunteers.
Specific Aim #1: Healthy volunteers: The investigators will test the hypothesis that with active bipedal movement there will be 1) no difference in head movement, but 2) greater motor cortex BOLD signal, 3) smoother force exchange between the feet, 4) higher participant satisfaction than unipedal movement or motor imagery alone. This sample size was selected based on a prior publication of imagined movement. The outcome of this aim may result in the first publication in the field to evaluate bipedal movement in an MR-environment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GAITRite assessment
Subjects will undergo the GAITRite assessment of functional walking and then complete the Functional MRI Bipedal paradigm followed by questionnaires and assessments regarding the virtual environment.
GAITRite assessment
The fMRI Bipedal Paradigm will allow investigators to study the effects treadmill-assisted gait training have on cortical control of bipedal movement in chronic stroke patients.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GAITRite assessment
The fMRI Bipedal Paradigm will allow investigators to study the effects treadmill-assisted gait training have on cortical control of bipedal movement in chronic stroke patients.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Right hand dominant
* Able to read and understand questionnaires and informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-mri compatible metal implants in the body
* Pregnant females
21 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MUSC Center for Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) in Stroke Recovery
UNKNOWN
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Colleen A Hanlon, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
72777
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.