Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1949 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-09-24
2020-06-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T to OPtimize Chest Pain Risk Stratification
NCT02984436
Clinical Study to Validate the Use of a New Point of Care Troponin I Test
NCT02620397
Cardiology-Emergency Medicine Cardiac Biomarker Research Initiative
NCT01984853
Finding Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) With Serial Troponin Testing for Rapid Assessment of Cardiac Ischemic Symptoms
NCT00880802
Diagnosis and Treatment of ACS in the ED: The Impact of Rapid Bedside cTnI Testing on Outcomes
NCT00222352
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For the past several decades serial measurements of cardiac biomarkers over a period of several hours have been the mainstay of ACS evaluation. More recently, "high sensitivity" assays for the troponin enzyme, the most widely followed marker of cardiac injury, have been introduced for clinical use outside of the United States.
These high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have been shown to be more sensitive for detecting injury to cardiac myocytes and have been employed in protocols that allow for a more rapid rule-in and rule-out of ACS in European, Canadian, and Australasian settings. In 2017, the FDA approved the Roche Elecsys Troponin T Gen 5 Stat (5th Gen Tn) assay for clinical use in the United States.
The American medical community has responded to this with both eagerness and trepidation. Despite large clinical trials demonstrating the utility of these new assays in study populations, it is unclear what the impact will be on clinical practice. There is an understandable concern among providers that this highly sensitive assay will identify many patients with elevated levels of troponin from non-ACS causes and with uncertain clinical significance. There is also uncertainty because studies performed in European populations may not be applicable to the multi-ethnic populations that present to US emergency departments.
While there is much literature that attests to the performance of the test in study settings, there is less understanding of the impact of this assay on real-world practice settings. Therefore, it is critically important that we track and study how the new assay affects provider practice and clinical outcomes in our diverse population of patients in our quaternary medical system which includes a largely inner city, lower income, multi-ethnic population with a high proportion of Hispanic and black patients.
Current local protocol calls for risk stratification of patients based on a modified version of the HEART Score in conjunction with serial 4th generation troponin measurements, at a 3 hour interval. Patients who have scores ≤ 3 are discharged with close outpatient follow up.
Starting data collection while the current 4th-generation troponin assay is still being used will enable us to perform a prospective, observational study on the impact of the 5th Gen Tn assay on patient throughput in the Emergency Department (ED). In particular the investigators would want to measure impact of the new assay on the amount of time it takes to evaluate a patient in the ED, as they anticipate the 5th Gen Tn will allow more rapid decision making in the clinical environment. The primary outcomes will be the change in the time it takes to make a clinical decision regarding admission or discharge to the hospital in patients presenting with possible ACS. This time interval is often referred to as the 'doctor to disposition time' or 'provider to decision time'. The investigators will also be able to evaluate impact on other throughput related factors such as admission rates.
Enrolling patients from the ED, the investigators will perform telephone follow-up 30 and 90 days following their ED visit to ascertain clinical outcomes. They will assess for any differences in the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) - defined as likely cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, malignant dysrhythmia, or emergent revascularization procedures - between patients evaluated with the 4th-generation and 5th Gen Tn can be quantified, both in the discharged and admitted groups. This study will be uniquely qualified to evaluate these outcomes in a Hispanic cohort, which has been relatively underrepresented in the literature to date.
In addition, studying the new assay in a real world clinical practice will allow investigators to better understand how to interpret rapid changes in troponin values that remain below the 99th percentile normal range (14 ng/L in females, 22 ng/L in males). Multiple studies have demonstrated the utility of measuring the change in serum troponin concentration (delta-troponin) over pre-defined time intervals for identifying patients at risk for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and MACE. In many EDs, however, limited clinical resources makes it difficult to obtain repeat blood tests on strict time frames. In the very high volume setting of the Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) ED, the investigators expect to be able to evaluate the utility of tracking the rate of change of the 5th Gen Tn assay over multiple time points.
Being able to quantify the impact of the new test on practice patterns and ED patient throughput is critical to understanding how to best implement 5th Gen Tn into protocols that provide safe and efficient care. This data will also be of high significance not just to our local institution but to many other acute care settings and health systems across the United States as they in turn adopt this new assay over the next several years. Finally, studying this new assay in the particular socioeconomic and racial/ethnic patient mix of our institution will help understand the best way to implement this test throughout the Western hemisphere.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with Possible ACS
Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms that maybe be caused by acute coronary syndrome, who are clinically considered to be at enough risk for ACS to send a cardiac enzyme as part of the diagnostic evaluation.
4th Gen cTnT
Current "Fourth" Generation Cardiac Troponin T Enzyme Assay
5th Gen cTnT
New "Fifth" Generation ("High-sensitivity") Troponin T Enzyme Assay
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
4th Gen cTnT
Current "Fourth" Generation Cardiac Troponin T Enzyme Assay
5th Gen cTnT
New "Fifth" Generation ("High-sensitivity") Troponin T Enzyme Assay
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to participate in follow-up (incarceration, lack of telephone access, cognitive impairment, etc.)
* Patients in or immediately post cardiac arrest
* Prior heart transplant
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Roche Pharma AG
INDUSTRY
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward H. Suh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAR7939
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.