The Impact of Electrocoagulation on Ovarian Reserve After Laparoscopic Excision of Ovarian Cysts.

NCT ID: NCT03585309

Last Updated: 2018-07-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-15

Study Completion Date

2019-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of bipolar electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy is currently considered the treatment of choice in women with benign ovarian cysts and has gained increasing acceptance among gynecologic sur¬geons . However, the safety of this technique in terms of ovarian damage to the operated gonad has recently been questioned. A great deal of evidence supports that the re¬moval of ovarian cysts is associated with injury to the ovarian reserve . Many of these studies involved patients who required assisted reproduction, and they found that the number both of follicles and retrieved oocytes obtained in the operated gonad during ovarian hyperstimulation was markedly reduced when compared with the contralateral intact ovary. However, most of these studies applied ovarian response to gonadotropin hyperstimulation to measure the ovarian reserve. It has been argued that these patients are not representative of all patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in terms of ovarian damage because these data were acquired from aggressive gonadotropin stimulation which is thought to be different from a natural menstrual cycle .

On the other hand, because ovarian reserve cannot be mea¬sured directly, the evaluation of ovarian reserve is difficult to carry out. The induction of ovarian hyperstimulation in an un¬selected population of surgical patients for the purpose of evaluating ovarian reserve is obviously ethically untenable. The serum level of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a predictor of functional ovarian reserve , but its usefulness is limited considering that the vast majority of patients un¬dergo monolateral excision of a cyst and the contralateral in¬tact gonad may completely substitute for reduced function of the operated ovary . Given the well-established role of ul¬trasound scanning in the diagnosis and follow-up of ovarian cysts, reported that basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter could be used as indicators of ovarian reserve. found that the value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity was an initial marker of ovarian reserve before the change of FSH level and ovarian volume.

With the combined use of serum hormonal evaluation and ultrasound examination, the investigators prospectively investigated the ovarian reserve of patients after the excision of benign ovarian cysts. The damage to ovarian reserve was evaluated during through a 12-month follow-up period after the application of bipolar, ultrasonic scalpel electrocoagulation or suture for ovarian cystectomy .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Endometrioma Ovary Cyst

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparascopy comper with coagulation and without coagulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The impact of electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts:

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Randomization Randomization will be conducted using computer generated table. Group A (48 CASES) without coagulation

Group A 6 89 92 35 1 15 21 16 60 49 53 91 34 5 94 64 88 58 7 33 8 75 29 56 10 23 37 19 32 71 55 84 36 77 50 2 46 70 82 9 51 54 72 18 25 31 14 63

Group B (48 CASES) with coagulation Group B 79 38 93 43 52 44 62 47 68 76 86 95 81 83 42 80 94 30 78 61 12 17 66 13 41 59 22 73 39 65 4 90 28 26 3 87 40 85 69 48 27 24 74 57 11 20 67 45

Allocation and concealment Nineteen six opaque envelopes will be numbered serially and in each envelope the corresponding letter which denotes the allocated group will be put according to randomization table then all envelopes will be closed and put in one box. When the first patient arrives the first envelope will be opened and the patient will be allocated according to the letter inside.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The impact of electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts:

Randomization Randomization will be conducted using computer generated table. Group A (48 CASES) without coagulation

Group A 6 89 92 35 1 15 21 16 60 49 53 91 34 5 94 64 88 58 7 33 8 75 29 56 10 23 37 19 32 71 55 84 36 77 50 2 46 70 82 9 51 54 72 18 25 31 14 63

Group B (48 CASES) with coagulation Group B 79 38 93 43 52 44 62 47 68 76 86 95 81 83 42 80 94 30 78 61 12 17 66 13 41 59 22 73 39 65 4 90 28 26 3 87 40 85 69 48 27 24 74 57 11 20 67 45

Allocation and concealment Nineteen six opaque envelopes will be numbered serially and in each envelope the corresponding letter which denotes the allocated group will be put according to randomization table then all envelopes will be closed and put in one box. When the first patient arrives the first envelope will be opened and the patient will be allocated according to the letter inside.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: 20-35 years.
2. Uni-bilateral ovarian cyst(s) size without clinical and sonographic suspicion of ovarian cancer.
3. Regular menstrual cycles defined as a cycle length between 25 and 35 days in the 6 months before surgery.
4. Agreement to be enrolled in the study.
5. Endometriosi.
6. Renal disesase.
7. Liver disease.

Exclusion Criteria

* 1- Prior ovarian surgery 2- Surgical necessity to perform adnexectomy 3- Known endocrine disease 4- Postoperative pathologic diagnosis that was not benign ovarian cyst 5- Oral contraceptive use before surgery last two months. 6-Addison disease. 7.Thyroid disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zahra Hussein Mohammed Chewai

Resident of obstetrics and gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

kareem labib, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ain shams University Maternity Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed Nagib, MD

Role: CONTACT

+201001403138

Kareem Labib, MD

Role: CONTACT

+201005115380

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

ahmed Nagib, MD

Role: primary

00201001403138

Kareem Labib, MD

Role: backup

00201005115380

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Asgari Z, Rouholamin S, Hosseini R, Sepidarkish M, Hafizi L, Javaheri A. Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by bipolar coagulation or suturing: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 May;293(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3918-4. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26493551 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ain shamsMH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Shockwaves on Fallopian Tubes Adhesion
NCT06755528 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA