Muscle Wasting in Hemodialysis Patient

NCT ID: NCT03583177

Last Updated: 2018-07-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-01

Study Completion Date

2018-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Muscle wasting is present in almost 50% of patients treated with chronic hemodialysis. It is associated with an increased risk of death (particularly from cardiovascular causes) and compromises quality of life (loss of autonomy and fatigue). The mechanisms leading to muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease have been the subject of several studies in animals. These have highlighted the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Activation of UPS during chronic kidney disease is multifactorial. It is the result of resistance to the action of insulin/IGF1, metabolic acidosis, low grade prolonged inflammation and increased production of myostatin. To date few studies have been conducted in humans.

The investigators want to identify blood markers related to muscle protein breakdown in patients undergoing hemodialysis. In parallel, the investigators want to adress the mechanisms involved in muscle proteolysis. In addition, the investigators want to identify the proteins degraded and the ubiquitination enzymes (E2/E3 couples) specifically involved in muscle loss during hemodialysis.

Muscle biopsies and blood sample will beperformed during scheduled surgeries in healthy volunteers (negative control), cancer patients (positive control) or undergoing chronic hemodialysis. RNA seq analysis will be performed in blood samples and proteomic mass spectrometry analysis for establishing a specific profile between muscle and blood markers. A limited subset of blood markers common to cancer and hemodialysis atrophying muscles will be used for elaborating a chip dedicated to early detect an atrophying process.

Thus, the investigators will first design a diagnostic tool for detecting non-invasively muscle protein breakdown before the onset of muscle atrophy. This will enable early and efficient nutritional counter-measures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis Measuring urinary 3-methylhistidine is a simple tool to assess proteolysis in clinical practice. However it is not totally specific of muscle proteolysis because it may reflect an intestinal catabolism. Moreover, its dosage cannot be used in patients with renal impairment especially in case of anuria. Apart from achieving muscle biopsy or measuring the overall kinetics of proteins it does not yet exist simple and reproducible diagnostic tool for measuring muscle proteolysis. With the present study, the investigators expect to identify in the blood of patients a particular transcriptomic profile related to the activation of muscle proteolysis, including increased proinflammatory cytokine transcripts.

Rodent models of CKD were used to identify major proteolytic system and signal pathway implicated in muscle wasting caused by uremia. These finding needs to be confirmed in humans studies. Also, other actors of muscle atrophy could be identified in humans. Notably, so far, few studies have been performed in order to determine which E2 are involved in muscle atrophy, and to knowledge of the investigators no one in CKD. Finally, data on muscle proteasome substrates are limited since only actin was clearly identified in humans by the team. The investigators expect an activation of the proteasome system with an increase in the expression of enzymes E2s, E3s including MURF1 and MAFbx and proteasome subunit in patients treated with hemodialysis. The investigators could also observe an activation of caspase system which is thought to work in concert with the UPS.

Materials and methods 2.1. Population The experiments will be performed using blood sample and human muscle biopsies obtained during programmed orthopedic surgery (negative control), cancer (positive control) and hemodialysis patients. This translational research program has already been accepted (DGS 2008-A00479-46) and inclusion of patients already started. A maximum of 15 patients per group will be included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set-up according to the objectives (absence of any pathology for controls, etc.) and the legislation (written consent, etc.). Thirty-two patients have already been included so far, and biopsies are stored in liquid nitrogen. Blood samples are collected just before surgery using Paxgene RNA tubes and stored following the manufacturer's instructions until analysis.

2.2. Blood sample Total RNA will be extracted from blood using Paxgene RNA Extraction kit and analysed by RNAseq 2.3. Muscle biopsies 2.3.1. Transcriptomic analysis Total RNA will be extracted from human muscle biopsies using commercial kits. The investigators will first verify that known muscles markers are up-regulated in cancer patient biopsies (positive controls) and address their levels in muscle biopsies from hemodialysis patients. We will thus perform qRT-PCR UBE2B, UBE2D2, MaFbx, MuRF1, Ozz, ASB2, E4B, Nedd4, Mdm2 and 26S proteasome subunits.

2.3.2. Proteomic analysis Proteomic analysis will be performed usin shot gun spectrometry analysis

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Atrophy in Lung Cancer and Hemodialysed Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

healthy volunteers

No intervention

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

No intervention

cancer patients

No intervention

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

No intervention

undergoing chronic hemodialysis patients

No intervention

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

No intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No intervention

No intervention

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* over 18 years old,
* with either newly diagnosed lung cancer (for whom surgical resection was programmed by thoracotomy) or patients with end-stage renal failure treated for at least 6 months by hemodialysis and necessitating femoral bypass revascularization.
* The control group patients required hip replacement for osteoarthritis.

Exclusion Criteria

* acute or chronic infections,
* diabetes mellitus,
* corticosteroid or hormone therapy or
* pregnancy.
* Glomerular filtration rate \< 90 mL/min for LC and CT patients
* active neoplasia in patients of the HD and CT groups
* CRP \> 3 mg/L in for CT patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julien ANIORT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-A00479-46

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CHU-397

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.