Endemic Mycoses Treatment With SUBA-itraconazole vs Itraconazole
NCT ID: NCT03572049
Last Updated: 2023-07-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-17
2022-04-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
SUBA-Itraconazole Therapy for Coccidioidomycosis Refractory or Intolerant to Fluconazole
NCT04809649
Study of Micafungin in Patients With Invasive Candidiasis or Candidemia
NCT00105144
A Randomized, Open, Comparative Multicenter Study of Initial Treatment With Intravenous Itraconazole Versus Amphotericin B Followed by Consolidation Treatment With Itraconazole Capsules in Patients With Blastomycosis or Histoplasmosis
NCT00002159
A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Micafungin Sodium in the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections
NCT02678598
Comparison of Candida Eradication and Serum Cidal Activity of Echinocandins
NCT00839540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study sample size will be 80 evaluable patients - target enrollment (three arms: approximately 40 histoplasmosis, 20 coccidioidomycosis, 20 other endemic fungal infections).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SUBA itraconazole
Stage 1: Day 1-3 two 65 mg capsules three times daily with food. Days 4-42 two 65 mg capsules twice daily with food.
Stage 2 : Days 43-180 two 65 mg capsules twice daily with food
SUBA itraconazole
SUBA itraconazole study drug will consist of two 65 mg capsules to be taken three times a day with food for days 1-3 of study. For days 4-180 of study, two 65mg capsules will be taken twice daily with food.
Conventional itraconazole
Stage 1: Day 1-3 two 100 mg capsules three times daily with food. Days 4-42 two 100 mg capsules twice daily with food.
Stage 2 : Days 43-180 two 100 mg capsules twice daily with food
Conventional itraconazole
Conventional itraconazole comparator drug will consist of two 100 mg capsules to be taken three times a day with food for days 1-3 of study. For days 4-180 of study, two 100 mg capsules will be taken twice daily with food.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SUBA itraconazole
SUBA itraconazole study drug will consist of two 65 mg capsules to be taken three times a day with food for days 1-3 of study. For days 4-180 of study, two 65mg capsules will be taken twice daily with food.
Conventional itraconazole
Conventional itraconazole comparator drug will consist of two 100 mg capsules to be taken three times a day with food for days 1-3 of study. For days 4-180 of study, two 100 mg capsules will be taken twice daily with food.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with a proven or probable endemic mycosis (Histoplasma, Coccidioides, Paracoccidioides, Blastomyces, Sporothrix, Talaromyces marneffei (formerly Penicillium marneffei) according to current EORTC/MSG (Mycoses Study Group) criteria, including patients who:
* Are immunosuppressed, including as a result of HIV/AIDS
* Have had a heart, lung or bone marrow transplant
* Have had chemotherapy for cancer
* Are otherwise normal hosts
Exclusion Criteria
2. Use of an alternative antifungal therapy (IV or oral) for more than 14 days for this infection, with the exception of Coccidioidomycosis. Subjects with Coccidioidomycosis who previously received fluconazole therapy for more than 14 days may be included, if in the opinion of the investigator, they are having an inadequate response or, are intolerant of fluconazole (e.g. due to adverse events). Such subjects must washout from fluconazole for 7 days (\~5 half-lives of fluconazole) before starting investigational therapy.
3. Evidence of CNS (central nervous system) infection.
4. Unable to take PO medications.
5. Female patients who are lactating or pregnant.
Women should be:
1. Postmenopausal for 1 year,
2. Post-hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy,
3. If of child bearing potential have a negative β-HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and using highly effective method of birth control throughout course of study or remain abstinent for duration of study.
6. Documented intolerance, allergy or hypersensitivity to an azole.
7. Inability to comply with study treatment, study visits, and study procedures.
8. Known history of congestive cardiac failure on medical treatment, fungal endocarditis, or other causes of ventricular dysfunction that may outweigh the benefit of itraconazole.
9. Patients with active TB (tuberculosis)
10. Concurrent use of astemizole, rifampin/rifampicin, rifabutin, ergot alkaloids, long acting barbiturates, carbamazepine, pimozide, quinidine, neostigmine, terfenadine, ketoconazole, valproic acid, or St. John's wort in the 5 days prior to first administration of study drug.
11. Any known or suspected condition of the patient that may jeopardize adherence to the protocol requirements or impede the accurate measurement of efficacy.
12. Treatment with any investigational agent in the 30 days prior to study entry.
13. Patients unlikely to survive 30 days (including severe fungal disease defined by systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90; hypoxia \< 60).
14. Patients with body weight \< 40 kg.
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Davis
OTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter Pappas
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter G Pappas, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
George R Thompson, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of California, Davis
Andrej Spec, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
University of California at Davis
Sacramento, California, United States
Rush University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Metro Infectious Disease Associates
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Unniversity of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Hospital Santo Tomás
Panama City, , Panama
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Spec A, Thompson GR, Miceli MH, Hayes J, Proia L, McKinsey D, Arauz AB, Mullane K, Young JA, McGwin G, McMullen R, Plumley T, Moore MK, McDowell LA, Jones C, Pappas PG. MSG-15: Super-Bioavailability Itraconazole Versus Conventional Itraconazole in the Treatment of Endemic Mycoses-A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Comparative Trial. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 29;11(3):ofae010. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae010. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Thompson GR 3rd, Lewis P, Mudge S, Patterson TF, Burnett BP. Open-Label Crossover Oral Bioequivalence Pharmacokinetics Comparison for a 3-Day Loading Dose Regimen and 15-Day Steady-State Administration of SUBA-Itraconazole and Conventional Itraconazole Capsules in Healthy Adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jul 22;64(8):e00400-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00400-20. Print 2020 Jul 22.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MSG-15
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UTN U1111-1228-5154
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MSG15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.