Intra- And Inter-operator Reliability Of Isometric Back And Abdominal Muscle Strength Testing In Healthy Controls And Persons With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.
NCT ID: NCT03571880
Last Updated: 2018-06-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-27
2018-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Exercise therapy is seen as an important component in the rehabilitation of persons with CNSPLBP3. Because previous research showed reduced muscle strength of the back muscles4, exercise therapy that improves / recovers muscle strength is being investigated. However, there is still a lack of clarity concerning the effect that reduced muscle strength has on the development and further development of back pain5-6. The objective testing of back muscle strength remains a recurring issue. Up to now, back muscle strength has been mainly tested by a battery of clinical tests (eg Sorensen test) or the use of "iso machines"7. These Iso machines contain a dynamometer that can very specifically reflect the isometric or isokinetic force on an axis of rotation. Different types of these iso machines (eg Cybex, Biodex) have already been developed, each with specific designs (eg differences in the hip angle, differences in the stabilization of the participant). However, to date no standardized protocols are available for evaluating both abdominal and back muscle strength. Furthermore, it is also essential that before such systems can be used in clinical intervention studies, the reliability of such systems is investigated and that reference data from healthy subjects are collected with which data from patients can be compared.
The aim of the current research is therefore to investigate the intra- and inter-operator reliability of a standardized protocol drawn up according to the latest scientific evidence. A second goal is to set standard values for healthy persons for the developed protocol using the Biodex 3 dynamometer system.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Stiffness of the Lumbar Back Muscles Between Low Back Pain and Healthy Controls
NCT03750474
High Intensity Training With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02786316
Structural and Functional Effects of High Intensity Training (HIT) Program in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02911987
Technology-supported Exercise Therapy for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02387515
Feasibility of a One-day-and-a-half for Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT04133818
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CNSLBP group
Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing
The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Healthy control group
Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing
The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing
The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. between 25-60 years old,
3. able to understand Dutch (spoken and written).
Exclusion Criteria
2. radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
3. co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, pregnancy,
4. ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability \> 6 months,
5. rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months.
25 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jessa Hospital
OTHER
Hasselt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Annick Timmermans
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonas Verbrugghe, drs
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hasselt University
Annick Timmermans, prof. dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hasselt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hasselt University
Hasselt, , Belgium
Jessa Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available.
van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, Verhagen AP, Ostelo R, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):19-39. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1518-3. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LBP-BIO-REL-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.