Assesment of Post-stroke Elbow Flexor Spasticity in Different Forearm Positions
NCT ID: NCT03563209
Last Updated: 2019-05-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-03-15
2018-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, hypothesis is that the severity of spasticity differs depending on the forearm position.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Muscle Selection for Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Poststroke Elbow Flexor Spasticity
NCT04036981
Investigation of the Effects of Upper Extremity Botulinum Toxin Application on Forearm Muscle Thickness and Motor Recovery in Patients With Hemiplegia
NCT07083752
The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injections on Pain, Functionality, Spasticity, and Range of Motion in Patients With Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Spasticity
NCT05887479
Early Use of Botulinum Toxin in Spasticity Post Stroke.
NCT01882556
Botulinum Toxin Applications in Hemiplegic Patients
NCT07240337
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Determination of which muscle is more spastic before injection of the botulinum toxin, and the application of the targeted treatment to that muscle results in more improvement in spasticity. Can the target muscle selection clinically be performed instead of methods such as electromyography where equipment is required and the evaluation period is relatively long? Can semi-quantitative methods used to assess the severity of spasticity provide reliable information regarding the muscle or muscles that contribute to elbow flexor spasticity? It is known that the muscles that flex elbow in healthy individuals change according to forearm position. While the biceps brachii flexes the forearm in supination, the brachioradialis flexes the forearm in the neutral position. The brachialis muscle acts as a primary flexor muscle when the forearm is in pronation.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether the severity of spasticity differs depending on the forearm position.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Grade 1 to 3 spasticity measured with Modified Ashworth Scale
* To agree to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Botulinum toxin injection within the last three months
* Presence of elbow contracture
* History of operation to spastic upper extremity
* Spasticity due to other causes other than stroke
* Do not agree to participate in the study
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Izmir Katip Celebi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
ilker şengül
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ilker şengül
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
İzmir Katip Çelebi University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ilker Şengül
Izmir, In the USA Or Canada, Please Select..., Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Keenan MA. Management of the spastic upper extremity in the neurologically impaired adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Aug;(233):116-25.
Genet F, Schnitzler A, Droz-Bartholet F, Salga M, Tatu L, Debaud C, Denormandie P, Parratte B. Successive motor nerve blocks to identify the muscles causing a spasticity pattern: example of the arm flexion pattern. J Anat. 2017 Jan;230(1):106-116. doi: 10.1111/joa.12538. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
Keenan MA, Haider TT, Stone LR. Dynamic electromyography to assess elbow spasticity. J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Jul;15(4):607-14. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(09)90023-5.
BASMAJIAN JV, LATIF A. Integrated actions and functions of the chief flexors of the elbow: a detailed electromyographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957 Oct;39-A(5):1106-18. No abstract available.
Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.
Gracies JM, Bayle N, Vinti M, Alkandari S, Vu P, Loche CM, Colas C. Five-step clinical assessment in spastic paresis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Sep;46(3):411-21.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21.02.2018-84
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.