Spastic Cocontractions and Limitation of Active Movements Before and After Treatment During Injection of Botulinum Toxin
NCT ID: NCT03453008
Last Updated: 2018-03-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-01-14
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to relieved the spastic cocontractions before and after usual injection of botulinum toxin A at stroke patient.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Upper-limb Active Function and Botulinum Toxin a
NCT03783572
Efficacy and Safety Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A Against Placebo to Treat Spasticity in the Arm After a Stroke
NCT01392300
HEMITOX : Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Motor and Functional Ability of Upper Limb in Adults at Earlier Phases of Spastic Hemiplegia After Stroke
NCT00276185
Central Effects of Botulinum Toxin: Neurophysiological Study in Stroke Patients With Spastic Lower Limb
NCT01829763
Early Treatment of Post-stroke Spasticity With Botulinum Toxin
NCT04404868
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The spastic cocontraction score will be compared between T1 (before the Botulinum toxin A injection) and T2 (4 weeks after the botulinum toxin A injection in the elbow flexors).
There is no control group. The patient is his own witness: the non-paretic side is considered as the physiological reference in terms of the level of spastic cocontractions.
Botulinum toxin A injections are performed in routine clinical practice in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, following the recommendations in force. This treatment has been shown to be effective on spasticity in several high-level studies. The reduction of spasticity, evaluated clinically (Tardieu and Ashworth scale), is a criterion of efficacy of botulinum toxin A injections.
The evaluation of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin A injections on the other components of muscular hyperactivity, such as the reduction of spastic cocontraction during active movements, is poorly performed in clinical and clinical research. This protocol includes specific assessments to evaluate the evolution of spastic cocontraction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
elbow extension, electromyography
Two evaluations before the toxin injection (T0 and T1), to quantify cocontractions and to determine the toxin injection pattern.
The first evaluation (T0) will be carried out within a period of between 1 month and 15 days before the injection. This evaluation makes it possible to pose the indication for the realization of injection of Botulinum Toxin A (TBA).
The second evaluation (T1) will be performed on the day of the injection to specify the muscle targets to be injected.
The first evaluation is a Clinical evaluation and second is Instrumental evaluation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of more than 6 months, cortical and / or subcortical;
* Indication to the realization of an injection of Botulinum Toxin A in the flexor muscles of the elbow according to the usual clinical criteria: presence of a functional complaint or aesthetic expressed by the patient and related to hyperactivity muscular (spasticity or cocontraction) on the flexor muscles elbow, which is a focal treatment by injection of botulinum toxin;
* Possibility of active extension of elbow\> 20 °;
* Patients naive to Botulinum Toxin A or more than 4 months of a first injection of Botulinum Toxin A, having targeted the elbow flexors.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pain when performing active movements of flexion / extension of the elbow
* Cognitive impairment limiting the comprehension of three basic instructions (proof test of the 3 papers of the MMS);
* Evolutionary or decompensated neurological pathology; Ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke of less than 6 months;
* General contraindication to the production of botulinum toxin; history of myasthenia gravis, Lambert Eaton syndrome; history of neuromuscular disease; surgery with curarization for less than 1 month; treatment with aminoglycoside, aminoquinoline or cyclosporine
* Legal incapacity (safeguard of justice, guardianship).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Gasq, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Toulouse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-A01616-47
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RC31/17/0191
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.