Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-12-08
2027-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Spastic Cocontractions and Limitation of Active Movements Before and After Treatment During Injection of Botulinum Toxin
NCT03453008
HEMITOX : Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Motor and Functional Ability of Upper Limb in Adults at Earlier Phases of Spastic Hemiplegia After Stroke
NCT00276185
ETREAT Study on Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections to Treat Post-stroke Upper and/or Lower Limb Spasticity
NCT02275312
Comparing Upper Limb Surgery and Botulinum Toxin for Spasticity: A Paired Design Study
NCT06733025
Attainment of Person-centred Goals After Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Upper Limb Spasticity in Real Life Practice
NCT02454803
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Motor task involves the muscles agonists and antagonists by phenomena of muscular coactivation.
In post-stroke patients, functional cortical reorganization secondary to the phenomena of plasticity leads to a reduced motor selectivity. The increase of muscular coactivation correspond to the spastic cocontraction, which are a little evaluated in clinical practice and research, whereas they appear to have a greater impact than spasticity on limitation of active movement.
This study does not evaluate the efficacy of treatment (BTX injection) but the effect of this treatment on a component of muscle hyperactivity, the spastic cocontraction.
In addition to the 5 follow-up visits, patients have 6 intercurrent visits. These visits are less invasive and include only a clinical assessment with surface EMG registration. These evaluations will evaluate the efficacy and harm effect of BTX on clinical parameters and on the spastic co-contraction index. Five intercurrent visits I1, I2, I3, I4, I5 are perform respectively 2 weeks after T1 and, 3, 6, 9, 12 weeks after T2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stroke patients
40 stroke patients : Injection of the TBA and the investigator will compare the measure of spastic cocontraction index (ICCS) during different movement before versus 4 weeks after injection of TBA : Clinical evaluation and Instrumental evaluation TBA injections are performed as part of routine care
Clinical evaluation and Instrumental evaluation
For the patient : The standard clinical examination to evaluate movement : pain, motive power, spasticity plus Edinburgh's laterality score and Sensitivity deficiency by the Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) score and the evaluation of the cognitive function An encephalic MRI An instrumental evaluation : with concomitant recording of 3D kinematic data, surface and intramuscular EMG of the flexor and elbow extensor muscles, and EEG during active elbow extension, paretic and non-paretic movements.
Control Group
The control group : Clinical evaluation consists in the search for criteria of non-inclusion and manual laterality score The will ha an Instrumental review just like the patient : concomitant evaluation of the 3D kinematics of the dominant upper limb, EMG of the triceps brachii muscles, biceps brachii, brachio-radial, brachial; associated with EEG recording, during active extension and elbow flexion movements, of the dominant upper extremity, at spontaneous and maximal speed Clinical evaluation
Clinical evaluation
For the control group : only one clinical evaluation : search for non-inclusion criteria and manual laterality score
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical evaluation
For the control group : only one clinical evaluation : search for non-inclusion criteria and manual laterality score
Clinical evaluation and Instrumental evaluation
For the patient : The standard clinical examination to evaluate movement : pain, motive power, spasticity plus Edinburgh's laterality score and Sensitivity deficiency by the Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) score and the evaluation of the cognitive function An encephalic MRI An instrumental evaluation : with concomitant recording of 3D kinematic data, surface and intramuscular EMG of the flexor and elbow extensor muscles, and EEG during active elbow extension, paretic and non-paretic movements.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication to an injection of BTA in the elbow flexor muscles according to the usual clinical criteria: request of elbow extension improvement with a functional or aesthetic objective;
* Being under prescription of abobotulinum toxin A (DYSPORT®, Ipsen-Pharma);
* Ability of active elbow extension\> 20 degrees;
* Limitation of active movement of elbow extension \> 15 degrees or decreased or 50% decrease in the active elbow extension rate;
* Patients who have never been treated with BTX or only a first injection that having targeted the elbow flexors more than 4 months ago;
* Age\> 18 years;
* Signature of informed consent;
* Subject affiliated to the social security coverture.
* Age\> 18 years
* Signature of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pain during active movements of elbow flexion/extension;
* Cognitive disorder with limited comprehension of three basic instructions (like the test of the 3 papers of the MMS);
* Evolutionary or decompensated neurological disease;
* Unstabilized epilepsy;
* Anticoagulant treatment with a curative dose or hemostasis disorder that contraindicates intramuscular injections;
* Claustrophobia or metallic foreign bodies contraindicated for MRI;
* General contraindication for botulinum toxin injection: hypersensitivity to the active substance or to one of the excipients, swallowing disorder, chronic respiratory disorders, antecedent of myasthenia or Lambert Eaton syndrome; antecedent of neuromuscular disease; surgery with curarization for less than a month; current treatment with aminoglycoside, aminoquinoline, cyclosporine or anticholinesterase.
* Presence of skin infection or inflammation at the injection site.
* Legal incapacity.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman;
* Woman with a desire to become pregnant within 18 months.
* Non-menopausal woman (a postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause) who does not use one of the following contraceptive methods considered highly effective : intrauterine device, oestroprogestonic contraception or progestogen hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, intrauterine hormone-releasing system, or bilateral tubal occlusion.
Control group
* History of orthopedic or neurologic disorders;
* Subject expert in a sport intensively requiring the upper limbs (at least departmental competition level);
* Legal incapacity.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Gasq, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Toulouse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-000941-38
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RC31/17/0455
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.