Upper-limb Active Function and Botulinum Toxin a

NCT ID: NCT03783572

Last Updated: 2024-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-08

Study Completion Date

2027-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study in an observational, prospective and longitudinal study. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX) injections into the elbow flexors on the reduction of spastic co-contractions (spastic co-contraction index, SCCI) during an active elbow extension in chronic post-stroke patients.TBA injections are performed as part of routine care

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BTX is a valuable treatment in the management of the focal muscle overactivity (spasticity) following acquired brain injury. If BTX injections reduce spasticity, few studies have examined its effect on the improvement of active function of the upper limb.

Motor task involves the muscles agonists and antagonists by phenomena of muscular coactivation.

In post-stroke patients, functional cortical reorganization secondary to the phenomena of plasticity leads to a reduced motor selectivity. The increase of muscular coactivation correspond to the spastic cocontraction, which are a little evaluated in clinical practice and research, whereas they appear to have a greater impact than spasticity on limitation of active movement.

This study does not evaluate the efficacy of treatment (BTX injection) but the effect of this treatment on a component of muscle hyperactivity, the spastic cocontraction.

In addition to the 5 follow-up visits, patients have 6 intercurrent visits. These visits are less invasive and include only a clinical assessment with surface EMG registration. These evaluations will evaluate the efficacy and harm effect of BTX on clinical parameters and on the spastic co-contraction index. Five intercurrent visits I1, I2, I3, I4, I5 are perform respectively 2 weeks after T1 and, 3, 6, 9, 12 weeks after T2.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Muscle Spasticity Upper Extremity Paralysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

2 groups, one with 40 stroke patients and the control group with 40 healthy subjects prospective, longitudinal, without blinding, multicenter.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stroke patients

40 stroke patients : Injection of the TBA and the investigator will compare the measure of spastic cocontraction index (ICCS) during different movement before versus 4 weeks after injection of TBA : Clinical evaluation and Instrumental evaluation TBA injections are performed as part of routine care

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clinical evaluation and Instrumental evaluation

Intervention Type OTHER

For the patient : The standard clinical examination to evaluate movement : pain, motive power, spasticity plus Edinburgh's laterality score and Sensitivity deficiency by the Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) score and the evaluation of the cognitive function An encephalic MRI An instrumental evaluation : with concomitant recording of 3D kinematic data, surface and intramuscular EMG of the flexor and elbow extensor muscles, and EEG during active elbow extension, paretic and non-paretic movements.

Control Group

The control group : Clinical evaluation consists in the search for criteria of non-inclusion and manual laterality score The will ha an Instrumental review just like the patient : concomitant evaluation of the 3D kinematics of the dominant upper limb, EMG of the triceps brachii muscles, biceps brachii, brachio-radial, brachial; associated with EEG recording, during active extension and elbow flexion movements, of the dominant upper extremity, at spontaneous and maximal speed Clinical evaluation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Clinical evaluation

Intervention Type OTHER

For the control group : only one clinical evaluation : search for non-inclusion criteria and manual laterality score

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clinical evaluation

For the control group : only one clinical evaluation : search for non-inclusion criteria and manual laterality score

Intervention Type OTHER

Clinical evaluation and Instrumental evaluation

For the patient : The standard clinical examination to evaluate movement : pain, motive power, spasticity plus Edinburgh's laterality score and Sensitivity deficiency by the Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA) score and the evaluation of the cognitive function An encephalic MRI An instrumental evaluation : with concomitant recording of 3D kinematic data, surface and intramuscular EMG of the flexor and elbow extensor muscles, and EEG during active elbow extension, paretic and non-paretic movements.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cortical and/or subcortical ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke for at least 6 months;
* Indication to an injection of BTA in the elbow flexor muscles according to the usual clinical criteria: request of elbow extension improvement with a functional or aesthetic objective;
* Being under prescription of abobotulinum toxin A (DYSPORT®, Ipsen-Pharma);
* Ability of active elbow extension\> 20 degrees;
* Limitation of active movement of elbow extension \> 15 degrees or decreased or 50% decrease in the active elbow extension rate;
* Patients who have never been treated with BTX or only a first injection that having targeted the elbow flexors more than 4 months ago;
* Age\> 18 years;
* Signature of informed consent;
* Subject affiliated to the social security coverture.


* Age\> 18 years
* Signature of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Passive limitation of elbow extension \> 30 degrees;
* Pain during active movements of elbow flexion/extension;
* Cognitive disorder with limited comprehension of three basic instructions (like the test of the 3 papers of the MMS);
* Evolutionary or decompensated neurological disease;
* Unstabilized epilepsy;
* Anticoagulant treatment with a curative dose or hemostasis disorder that contraindicates intramuscular injections;
* Claustrophobia or metallic foreign bodies contraindicated for MRI;
* General contraindication for botulinum toxin injection: hypersensitivity to the active substance or to one of the excipients, swallowing disorder, chronic respiratory disorders, antecedent of myasthenia or Lambert Eaton syndrome; antecedent of neuromuscular disease; surgery with curarization for less than a month; current treatment with aminoglycoside, aminoquinoline, cyclosporine or anticholinesterase.
* Presence of skin infection or inflammation at the injection site.
* Legal incapacity.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman;
* Woman with a desire to become pregnant within 18 months.
* Non-menopausal woman (a postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause) who does not use one of the following contraceptive methods considered highly effective : intrauterine device, oestroprogestonic contraception or progestogen hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, intrauterine hormone-releasing system, or bilateral tubal occlusion.

Control group


* History of orthopedic or neurologic disorders;
* Subject expert in a sport intensively requiring the upper limbs (at least departmental competition level);
* Legal incapacity.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Toulouse

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Gasq, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Toulouse

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

David Gasq, MD

Role: CONTACT

05 61 32 28 42 ext. 33

Audrey Tomasik

Role: CONTACT

05 61 77 85 97 ext. 33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

David Gasq, MD

Role: primary

05 61 32 28 42 ext. 33

Audrey TOMASIK

Role: backup

05 61 77 85 97 ext. 33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-000941-38

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RC31/17/0455

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.