Cricoid Pressure vs. Paralaryngeal Pressure to Prevent Regurgitation
NCT ID: NCT03558633
Last Updated: 2019-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
96 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-06-01
2019-06-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Cricoid and Paratracheal Pressures for Occluding Esophagus
NCT03992950
Factors Associated With Occluding the Upper Esophagus by Paratracheal Force
NCT06210867
Effect of Paratracheal Esophagus Pressure on the Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT04106635
Paratracheal Esophagus Pressure on the Intubation With Pentax Airway Scope
NCT04135651
Cricoid Pressure Versus Paratracheal Pressure
NCT04481854
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Confirm the relative positions between esophagus and trachea in awake patients by using ultrasonography.
2. Compare the effect of 'Cricoid pressure' and 'Paralaryngeal pressure' to esophageal opening during tracheal intubation procedure as below points.
1\) Awake states. (Before sedation) 2) Anesthetized states. (After muscle relaxation) 3) During direct intubation procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Aspiration tendency
* Known or predicted difficult airway.
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jin-Young Hwang
Associate professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Warner MA, Warner ME, Weber JG. Clinical significance of pulmonary aspiration during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1993 Jan;78(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199301000-00010.
Lienhart A, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, Benhamou D, Warszawski J, Bovet M, Jougla E. Survey of anesthesia-related mortality in France. Anesthesiology. 2006 Dec;105(6):1087-97. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00008.
Koenig SJ, Lakticova V, Mayo PH. Utility of ultrasonography for detection of gastric fluid during urgent endotracheal intubation. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Apr;37(4):627-31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2125-9. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20180222/30-2018-11/033
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.