Neural Damage and Anesthetic Treatment in the Preeclamptic Parturient; a Prospective Observational Study.

NCT ID: NCT03551223

Last Updated: 2019-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives: Our primary objective is to evaluate the effect of anesthetic method (general versus regional anesthesia) on neural outcomes in the preeclamptic population undergoing cesarean delivery. Secondary outcome is to examine the fetal cerebral outcomes associated with the anesthetic method.

Methodology: This prospective, observational study, will include 50 preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section under general and regional anesthesia.

Neuron specific enolase and S100B Protein are neuronal injury biomarkers. Increased levels of these biomarkers in serum indicate neuron damage. Following enrollment venous blood will be drawn from the participants and assessed for NSE and S100B serum levels at the following points; Upon hospital admission and one day postpartum. Furthermore in order to evaluate fetal outcomes upon fetal delivery, umbilical cord blood will be examined for NSE and S100B.

Study significance: While spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic method for the preeclamptic parturient undergoing cesarean delivery, it remains uncertain which anesthetic method is neuroprotective.

This study will be the first study, to our knowledge, to examine the effect of anesthetic method on neuronal outcomes for a parturient with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery, by the use of noninvasive cerebral biomarkers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Scientific background:

Preeclampsia is an idiopathic maternal, multi organ, specific pregnancy disorder, associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia complicates approximately 2-8% of all pregnancies. The disorder is characterized by new-onset of hypertension and proteinuria developing after gestational week 20. While the pathogenesis of the disease remains not completely understood, a possible explanation is endothelial cell dysfunction in which placenta-derived mediators causes multisystem organ dysfunction .

Preeclampsia increases the risk for acute cerebrovascular complications such as intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral edema and eclampsia. Treatment with magnesium sulfate reduces the risk for seizures and treatment with antihypertensive therapy reduces the risk for a stroke , however the only effective treatment for the syndrome is prompt delivery of the fetus .

When considering the optimal anesthetic method for a preeclamptic parturient undergoing cesarean delivery, neuraxial anesthetic techniques, when feasible, are strongly preferred to general anesthesia (GA) . Spinal anesthesia (SA) is favored over general anesthesia since it is associated with increased benefits and reduced risks compared with general anesthesia. Increased benefits of SA include higher patient satisfaction, decreased pain and favorable neonatal outcomes. GA has been associated with increased risk for aspiration, unstable hemodynamics and difficult airway management . In addition GA has been shown to increase the risk for a stroke in women with preeclampsia . Nevertheless GA is sometime used in the preeclamptic parturient due to maternal or fetal indications with an incidence as high as 44% in some European countries .

Accumulative evidence from animal studies indicate that general anesthetic agents are neurotoxic and can induce subsequent behavioral abnormalities in the developmental mind . However the fetal and pediatric implications remain inconclusive. In a population-based birth cohort study fetal exposure to general anesthesia during cesarean delivery was not associated with increased risk for learning disabilities compared to delivering vaginally . In contrast in a population-based birth cohort study conducted in Taiwan the incidence of autism was increased in neonates who were delivered by cesarean delivery under general anesthesia compared with regional anesthesia .

Despite experts favoring neuraxial anesthesia for the preeclamptic population, to date research remains inconclusive regarding which anesthetic method is neuroprotective.

In recent years numerous biochemical tests have become usual clinical cerebral damage biomarkers, amongst them is the Neuron specific enolase (NSE). The NSE is an intracytoplasmic glycolytic enzyme enolase . The enzyme is expressed in neurons and neuroendocrine tissue . Increased levels of NSE are released into the blood circulation according to the death rate of those cells . Elevated levels of NSE have been observed after severe head trauma and in association to postoperative cognitive dysfunction .

S100B Protein, an additional neuronal injury biomarker, is an acidic calcium-binding protein, and physiological serum levels of S100B protein are low . The protein is found primarily in astrocytes and Schwann cells and has both intracellular and extracellular targets.

Elevated serum and CSF levels of S100B indicate neural damage . Research evaluating cerebral damage biomarkers in parturients with preeclampsia has found increased levels of neuronal injury biomarkers compared with healthy parturients . Furthermore increased plasma levels of S100B have been correlated with neurological symptoms in the form of visual disturbances . Lisa et al demonstrated persistent increased levels of NSE up to one year postpartum .

Additionally, various studies have examined the correlation between cerebral biomarkers levels in umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid and fetal pathological conditions: intra uterine fetal death, preterm delivery, cerebral palsy and preeclampsia . Tskitishvili, et al showed increased levels of cerebral injury damage in amniotic fluid of parturients with preeclampsia .

In this study we aim to evaluate the effect of anesthetic method on neural outcomes in the preeclamptic population undergoing cesarean delivery.

Specific Aims:

Our primary objective is to examine which anesthetic method (GA versus RA) is associated with reduced neural damage as measured by NSE and S100B serum levels in preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.

Our secondary objective is to examine the effect of anesthetic method on fetal cerebral outcomes as measured by NSE and S100B umbilical cord blood levels in parturients with preeclampsia.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, single center, observational trial to assess the effect of anesthetic method on cerebral outcomes. The study will be conducted at the Rabin Medical Center (Beilinson Campus), Petach Tikva, Israel, a tertiary university hospital.

Fifty preeclamptic parturients aged 18 and above, undergoing cesarean delivery under SA or GA, will be included in the study.

This study is a purely observational study, it will not have any clinical intervention nor will it interfere with standard cesarean delivery protocols in any way. Inclusion criteria Fifty preeclamptic parturients age 18 and above presenting for cesarean delivery under SA or GA, with ability to comply with study requirements will be enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria

The following parturients will be excluded:

1. Parturients under age 18
2. Parturients undergoing a vaginal delivery.
3. Parturients unable to sign an informed consent forum.

Study enrollment:

All preeclamptic parturients will be recruited upon admission to the women's emergency room. All participating patients will undergo an informed consent process, which will include a through explanation of the study design and patient requirements, by the study investigator. Following which patients will be requested to sign the informed consent document.

Index procedure:

Following obtaining approval from parturients 5 cc of venous blood will be drawn from each of the participants and will be examined for NSE and S100B serum levels at the following time points:

1. Upon hospital admission following obtaining informed consent approval.
2. Upon fetal delivery, umbilical cord blood will be examined for NSE and S100B.
3. 1 day postpartum. The blood samples will be collected in heparin containing tubes, the samples will be kept in room temperature for no longer than an hour before being sent to the laboratory for centrifugation. Following centrifugation the samples will be frozen at -70 °C until levels of NSE and S100B can be analyzed. Plasma levels will be tested to detect NSE and S100B levels using commercially available kits (Liasion Sangtec 100) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Intraoperative anesthetic technique will be administered at anesthesiologists' discretion. The study cohort will be divided into two groups: women undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia, and women undergoing cesarean delivery under regional-spinal anesthesia.

NSE and S100B levels will be compared for both groups in order to evaluate which anesthetic method is associated with reduced neuronal injury Additionally, umbilical cord blood NSE and S100B levels will be compared for both groups, in order to assess the fetal outcomes of each anesthetic method.

Data collection:

For each participant the following additional data will be collected and documented:

1. Demographic data obstetric age, weight, height,
2. Obstetric data; gravidity and parity, obstetric history comorbidities, regular medication and preeclampsia management protocols and more.
3. Anesthetic and analgesic data: type of anesthesia / analgesia, anesthetic drug solution, anesthetic drug doses, vasopressor treatment, hemodynamic data, and other anesthetic data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Phosphopyruvate Hydratase

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Women undergoing cesarean delivery with general anesthesia

Preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia

Neuron specific enolase (NSE)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

5 cc of venous blood will be drawn from all of the participants and be examined for NSE and S100 B serum levels in order to evaluate evaluate which anesthetic method (general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia) is associated with reduced neuronal injury in a preeclamptic parturients undergoing a cesarean section.

Women undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesth

Preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under regional-spinal anesthesia

Neuron specific enolase (NSE)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

5 cc of venous blood will be drawn from all of the participants and be examined for NSE and S100 B serum levels in order to evaluate evaluate which anesthetic method (general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia) is associated with reduced neuronal injury in a preeclamptic parturients undergoing a cesarean section.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neuron specific enolase (NSE)

5 cc of venous blood will be drawn from all of the participants and be examined for NSE and S100 B serum levels in order to evaluate evaluate which anesthetic method (general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia) is associated with reduced neuronal injury in a preeclamptic parturients undergoing a cesarean section.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

S100B Protein

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Fifty preeclamptic parturients age 18 and above presenting for cesarean delivery under SA or GA, with ability to comply with study requirements will be enrolled in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

The following parturients will be excluded:

1. Parturients under age 18
2. Parturients undergoing a vaginal delivery.
3. Parturients unable to sign an informed consent forum.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rabin Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beilinson hospital

Petach Tikvah, , Israel

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sharon Orbach, MD

Role: primary

972-54-538-3093

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bergman L, Akerud H. Plasma Levels of the Cerebral Biomarker, Neuron-Specific Enolase, are Elevated During Pregnancy in Women Developing Preeclampsia. Reprod Sci. 2016 Mar;23(3):395-400. doi: 10.1177/1933719115604732. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26355117 (View on PubMed)

US Preventive Services Task Force; Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Barry MJ, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Kemper AR, Krist AH, Kurth AE, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Phillips WR, Phipps MG, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW. Screening for Preeclampsia: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2017 Apr 25;317(16):1661-1667. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3439.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28444286 (View on PubMed)

Clark VA, Sharwood-Smith GH, Stewart AV. Ephedrine requirements are reduced during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in preeclampsia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Jan;14(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.08.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15627532 (View on PubMed)

Henke VG, Bateman BT, Leffert LR. Focused review: spinal anesthesia in severe preeclampsia. Anesth Analg. 2013 Sep;117(3):686-693. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829eeef5. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23868886 (View on PubMed)

Tskitishvili E, Komoto Y, Temma-Asano K, Hayashi S, Kinugasa Y, Tsubouchi H, Song M, Kanagawa T, Shimoya K, Murata Y. S100B protein expression in the amnion and amniotic fluid in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;12(12):755-61. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gal083. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17023485 (View on PubMed)

Huang CJ, Fan YC, Tsai PS. Differential impacts of modes of anaesthesia on the risk of stroke among preeclamptic women who undergo Caesarean delivery: a population-based study. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):818-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq266. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20926478 (View on PubMed)

Pant M, Fong R, Scavone B. Prevention of peri-induction hypertension in preeclamptic patients: a focused review. Anesth Analg. 2014 Dec;119(6):1350-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000424.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25405694 (View on PubMed)

De Tina A, Palanisamy A. General Anesthesia During the Third Trimester: Any Link to Neurocognitive Outcomes? Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Mar;35(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28131121 (View on PubMed)

Graham MR. Clinical update regarding general anesthesia-associated neurotoxicity in infants and children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;30(6):682-687. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000520.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28915132 (View on PubMed)

Sprung J, Flick RP, Wilder RT, Katusic SK, Pike TL, Dingli M, Gleich SJ, Schroeder DR, Barbaresi WJ, Hanson AC, Warner DO. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology. 2009 Aug;111(2):302-10. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181adf481.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19602960 (View on PubMed)

Chien LN, Lin HC, Shao YH, Chiou ST, Chiou HY. Risk of autism associated with general anesthesia during cesarean delivery: a population-based birth-cohort analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Apr;45(4):932-42. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2247-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25256350 (View on PubMed)

Lee A, Kim SH, Hong JY, Hwang JH. Effect of anesthetic methods on cerebral oxygen saturation in elderly surgical patients: prospective, randomized, observational study. World J Surg. 2012 Oct;36(10):2328-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1676-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22736340 (View on PubMed)

Hoppenstein D, Zohar E, Ramaty E, Shabat S, Fredman B. The effects of general vs spinal anesthesia on frontal cerebral oxygen saturation in geriatric patients undergoing emergency surgical fixation of the neck of femur. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Sep;17(6):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.09.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16171663 (View on PubMed)

Hirose N, Kondo Y, Maeda T, Suzuki T, Yoshino A. Relationship between regional cerebral blood volume and oxygenation and blood pressure during spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section. J Anesth. 2016 Aug;30(4):603-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2165-6. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27011334 (View on PubMed)

Sun S, Liu NH, Huang SQ. Role of cerebral oxygenation for prediction of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug;30(4):417-21. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9733-4. Epub 2015 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26186992 (View on PubMed)

Trakas E, Domnina Y, Panigrahy A, Baust T, Callahan PM, Morell VO, Munoz R, Bell MJ, Sanchez-de-Toledo J. Serum Neuronal Biomarkers in Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Jul;72:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28571730 (View on PubMed)

van Munster BC, Korse CM, de Rooij SE, Bonfrer JM, Zwinderman AH, Korevaar JC. Markers of cerebral damage during delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture. BMC Neurol. 2009 May 27;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19473521 (View on PubMed)

Tomaszewski D. Biomarkers of Brain Damage and Postoperative Cognitive Disorders in Orthopedic Patients: An Update. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:402959. doi: 10.1155/2015/402959. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26417595 (View on PubMed)

Georgiadis D, Berger A, Kowatschev E, Lautenschlager C, Borner A, Lindner A, Schulte-Mattler W, Zerkowski HR, Zierz S, Deufel T. Predictive value of S-100beta and neuron-specific enolase serum levels for adverse neurologic outcome after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jan;119(1):138-47. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(00)70229-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10612773 (View on PubMed)

Wikstrom AK, Ekegren L, Karlsson M, Wikstrom J, Bergenheim M, Akerud H. Plasma levels of S100B during pregnancy in women developing pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012 Oct;2(4):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26105610 (View on PubMed)

Vettorazzi J, Torres FV, de Avila TT, Martins-Costa SH, Souza DO, Portela LV, Ramos JG. Serum S100B in pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia: A case-control study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012 Apr;2(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26105095 (View on PubMed)

Bergman L, Akerud H, Wikstrom AK, Larsson M, Naessen T, Akhter T. Cerebral Biomarkers in Women With Preeclampsia Are Still Elevated 1 Year Postpartum. Am J Hypertens. 2016 Dec 1;29(12):1374-1379. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw097.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27653032 (View on PubMed)

Gazzolo D, Vinesi P, Marinoni E, Di Iorio R, Marras M, Lituania M, Bruschettini P, Michetti F. S100B protein concentrations in cord blood: correlations with gestational age in term and preterm deliveries. Clin Chem. 2000 Jul;46(7):998-1000. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10894846 (View on PubMed)

Lu H, Huang W, Chen X, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Chang M. Relationship between premature brain injury and multiple biomarkers in cord blood and amniotic fluid. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Nov;31(21):2898-2904. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1359532. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28738706 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0504-17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.