Incidence of Difficult Airway and Difficult Neuraxial Placement in Obstetric Patients
NCT ID: NCT02193542
Last Updated: 2022-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-07-01
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Regional anesthesia uses a needle to enter a narrow space in the mother's back where medications can be given. In some patients, it takes longer to find this target space in the back. In emergency situation, however, there is often little time to find this space, and the backup method would be the general anesthesia technique.
If general anesthesia is required, a breathing tube needs to be inserted to help support the mother's breathing. In some patients, it is harder to insert the breathing tubes, so knowing this in advanced helps anesthesiologists create a safe plan for the patients. A lot of research has been done to determine factors that would predict which patients would need more time and preparation for general anesthesia and regional anesthesia.
The purpose of this study is to study how common it is for the pregnant patients who have a difficult regional and general anesthesia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Central Arterial Pressure Changes With Use of Regional Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients
NCT02933541
Oxytocin And Uterotonic Agent Use For Cesarean Delivery
NCT01549223
Non Invasive Haemodynamics in Neuraxial Anaesthesia Hypotension
NCT03653442
Optimal Site of Administration for Continuous Wound Infusion After Cesarean Section
NCT01160913
Ninvasive Cardiac Output Measurements During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia.
NCT01928797
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regional anesthesia uses a needle to enter a narrow space in the mother's back where medications can be given. In some patients, it takes longer to find this target space in the back. In emergency situation, however, there is often little time to find this space, and the backup method would be the general anesthesia technique.
If general anesthesia is required, a breathing tube needs to be inserted to help support the mother's breathing. In some patients, it is harder to insert the breathing tubes, so knowing this in advanced helps anesthesiologists create a safe plan for the patients. A lot of research has been done to determine factors that would predict which patients would need more time and preparation for general anesthesia and regional anesthesia.
The purpose of this study is to study how common it is for the pregnant patients who have a difficult regional and general anesthesia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pregnant patient
Pregnant woman presenting for vaginal or cesarean delivery
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lawrence Ching Tsen
Vice Chair, Faculty Development and Education; Director of Anesthesia, Center for Reproductive Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lawrence C Tsen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):645-53. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030. No abstract available.
Hawkins JL. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;46(3):679-87. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200309000-00020. No abstract available.
Ross BK. ASA closed claims in obstetrics: lessons learned. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2003 Mar;21(1):183-97. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(02)00051-2.
Ellinas EH, Eastwood DC, Patel SN, Maitra-D'Cruze AM, Ebert TJ. The effect of obesity on neuraxial technique difficulty in pregnant patients: a prospective, observational study. Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1225-31. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b5a1d2.
Fettes PD, Jansson JR, Wildsmith JA. Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):739-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep096. Epub 2009 May 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
bwhobanes-DADB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.