Carbon Nanoparticles as Lymph Node Tracer in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy
NCT ID: NCT03550001
Last Updated: 2018-06-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
252 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-01
2023-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Carbon Nanoparticles vs Indocyanine Green
NCT04759820
Clinical Application of Carbon Nanoparticles in Lymph Node Tracing and Surgery Guiding of Colorectal Cancer
NCT06783985
Safety and Efficacy of CEA-targeted CAR-T for CEA-positive Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors
NCT05538195
High-activity Natural Killer Immunotherapy for Small Metastases of Colorectal Cancer
NCT03008499
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT05479240
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Injection CNP before NAT
Inject carbon nanoparticle as a lymph node tracer before the patient receive neoadjuvant therapy.
Injection CNP before NAT
Injection carbon nanoparticle via rectal mucosa before neoadjuvant therapy
No injection
Do not inject carbon nanoparticle during the treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Injection CNP before NAT
Injection carbon nanoparticle via rectal mucosa before neoadjuvant therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma;
3. The rectal adenocarcinoma 0-12cm from the anal margin;
4. Clinical TNM stage: T3+ or N+;
5. Untreated patients (who have not received treatment including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery);
6. Good liver and kidney function, without contraindications for radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery;
7. Able and willing to give informed consent to participate;
Exclusion Criteria
2. Emergency operations such as intestinal obstruction, perforation and hemorrhage;
3. Pregnant or lactating women;
4. History of severe mental illness;
5. Contraindications for radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery;
6. Conditions that the researcher thinks it is not suitable for selection.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
YE Yingjiang
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
YE Yingjiang
Professor of Surgery, Director of Department of Gastroenterological Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yingjiang Ye, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Peking University People's Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rodel C, Cervantes A, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224. No abstract available.
Mechera R, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Speich B. Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
Gurawalia J, Dev K, Nayak SP, Kurpad V, Pandey A. Less than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy: an indicator of tumor regression in locally advanced rectal cancer? J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Dec;7(6):946-957. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.09.03.
Kim HJ, Jo JS, Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Low Lymph Node Retrieval After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer is Associated with Improved Prognosis in Patients with a Good Tumor Response. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):2075-81. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4235-z. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
Xu Z, Berho ME, Becerra AZ, Aquina CT, Hensley BJ, Arsalanizadeh R, Noyes K, Monson JRT, Fleming FJ. Lymph node yield is an independent predictor of survival in rectal cancer regardless of receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Jul;70(7):584-592. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203995. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
Lykke J, Jess P, Roikjaer O; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. A minimum yield of twelve lymph nodes in rectal cancer remains valid in the era of neo-adjuvant treatment : results from a national cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Mar;30(3):347-51. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2145-6. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
Lykke J, Jess P, Roikjaer O; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Increased Lymph Node Yield Is Associated With Improved Survival in Rectal Cancer Irrespective of Neoadjuvant Treatment: Results From a National Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Sep;58(9):823-30. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000429.
Bhangu A, Kiran RP, Brown G, Goldin R, Tekkis P. Establishing the optimum lymph node yield for diagnosis of stage III rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Aug;18(8):709-17. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1114-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
Carvalho C, Glynne-Jones R. Challenges behind proving efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e354-e363. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30346-7.
Horne J, Carr NJ, Bateman AC, Kandala N 2nd, Adams J, Silva S, Ryder I. A comparison of formalin and GEWF in fixation of colorectal carcinoma specimens: rates of lymph node retrieval and effect on TNM staging. J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jun;69(6):511-7. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203281. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
Yegen G, Keskin M, Buyuk M, Kunduz E, Balik E, Saglam EK, Kapran Y, Asoglu O, Gulluoglu M. The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016 Feb;20:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
Munster M, Hanisch U, Tuffaha M, Kube R, Ptok H. Ex Vivo Intra-arterial Methylene Blue Injection in Rectal Cancer Specimens Increases the Lymph-Node Harvest, Especially After Preoperative Radiation. World J Surg. 2016 Feb;40(2):463-70. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3230-2.
Farinella E, Vigano L, Fava MC, Mineccia M, Bertolino F, Capussotti L. In vivo lymph node mapping and pattern of metastasis spread in locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;28(11):1523-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1727-4. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
Zhang XM, Liang JW, Wang Z, Kou JT, Zhou ZX. Effect of preoperative injection of carbon nanoparticle suspension on the outcomes of selected patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2016 Apr 4;35:33. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0097-z.
Wang Y, Deng H, Chen H, Liu H, Xue Q, Yan J, Li G. Preoperative Submucosal Injection of Carbon Nanoparticles Improves Lymph Node Staging Accuracy in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Nov;221(5):923-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.455. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, Marnay J, Henry-Amar M, Petiot JF, Roussel A, Jacob JH, Segol P, Samama G, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer. 1994 Jun 1;73(11):2680-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:113.0.co;2-c.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-PKUPH077
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.