Best Practice Using Rocuronium and Reversal With Neostigmine or Sugammadex

NCT ID: NCT03543826

Last Updated: 2022-11-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

201 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-21

Study Completion Date

2018-11-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is an estimation study, prospectively evaluating the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (PRNB) when a best practice protocol is implemented for a cohort of abdominal surgery and orthopedic surgery patients. The protocol is developed within the constraint of subjective monitoring, quantitative monitoring is not used, and use of rocuronium for paralysis and either neostigmine or sugammadex for reversal. The primary outcome is the incidence of PRNB on arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit, defined as a train-of-four ration \<0.9.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study estimates the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular block when rocuronium neuromuscular block is managed by protocol for qualitative monitoring and reversal with neostigmine or sugammadex. The study is an extension of the recently published study by Thilen and co-workers which evaluated a protocol which used neostigmine as the sole reversal agent (doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.029). It demonstrated that use of a protocol was associated with a reduced incidence of severe residual paralysis, defined as normalized train-of-four (TOF) ratio \<0.7 at time of tracheal extubation. It was also associated with a highly significant reduction in PRNB as defined for several secondary outcomes, including non-normalized (i.e. raw) TOF-ratio \<0.9 at time of arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).

The current study does not include a control group, only an intervention group. The investigators hypothesize that PRNB can be prevented by adhering to a protocol which incorporates several current recommendations by experts. Importantly, the protocol preserves a role for neostigmine when the pre-reversal assessment indicates that spontaneous recovery has progressed to a so-called minimal block which is defined as the subjective absence of fade in the adductor pollicis TOF response. The investigators will study only abdominal surgery and orthopedic surgery patients. The primary outcome is incidence of PRNB, defined as TOF-ratio \<0.9 on arrival to the PACU. The investigators plan to enroll 120 patients, and if no more than one patient has PRNB, the upper bound for the 95% confidence interval will be less than 5%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Weakness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Subjects undergoing orthopedic or abdominal surgery

Subjects undergoing orthopedic or abdominal surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade. Subjects all receive the neuromuscular blockade drug Rocuronium based on study protocol. Depending on depth of block (subjectively assessed by TOF response), Neostigmine, Sugammadex, or no reversal drug is used to reverse block prior to extubation.

Group Type OTHER

Protocol for rocuronium neuromuscular block

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

The protocol includes specified appropriate rocuronium dosing and a valid pre-reversal assessment of the adductor pollicis response guides optimal neostigmine vs. sugammadex reversal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Protocol for rocuronium neuromuscular block

The protocol includes specified appropriate rocuronium dosing and a valid pre-reversal assessment of the adductor pollicis response guides optimal neostigmine vs. sugammadex reversal.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephan Thilen

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephan R Thilen, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Washington

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thilen SR, Liang T, Kruse TN, Cain KC, Treggiari MM, Bhananker SM. Evaluation of a Protocol for the Management of Maintenance and Reversal of Rocuronium Block Using Neostigmine or Sugammadex. Anesth Analg. 2023 Jun 1;136(6):1143-1153. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006510. Epub 2023 May 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37205804 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00003888

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.