Nanocrystalline Gold to Treat Remyelination Failure in Chronic Optic Neuropathy In Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT03536559

Last Updated: 2023-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

73 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-23

Study Completion Date

2022-07-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of CNM-Au8 as a remyelinating treatment for vision-impairing MS lesions in participants who have chronic vision impairment as a result of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. The primary endpoint is to assess the efficacy and safety of CNM-Au8 as a remyelinating therapy in patients with stable RMS. The secondary endpoint is Change in Functional Composite Responder Analysis Score from Baseline to Week 24.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of CNM-Au8 in stable RRMS patients who have Chronic Optic Neuropathy evidence by low contrast letter acuity deficits at Screening.

Patients will be screened over a 6-week period. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusionary criteria will be enrolled into the clinical study.

All enrolled patients will have their visual baseline established in both eyes by functional, electrophysiological (at participating research sites), and morphological tests.

For each patient, the eye with the worst Baseline LCLA score will be considered as the affected eye. The other eye will be considered as the fellow eye. If both eyes have the same LCLA score at Baseline, then one eye will be randomly selected by the statistician to assess as the designated affected eye. Efficacy endpoints will be assessed in both the affected and the fellow eyes. Patients will be randomized to one of three groups: placebo, or one of two doses of CNM-Au8. All patients will receive their randomized investigational product (IP) dose daily over at least 24 consecutive weeks during the Fixed Duration Treatment Period. The study will also have a blinded Variable Duration Treatment Period for up to an additional 24-weeks (up to a 48-week maximum blinded duration) until the last-patient enrolled completes his/her Week 24 study visit per the study scheme in Figure 2. When the last enrolled patient completes his or her Week 24 visit, patients enrolled in the Variable Duration Treatment Period will complete the End-of-Study (EOS) visit at their next scheduled study visit.

The primary efficacy outcome measure will be assessed Efficacy will be assessed as an improvement in best-corrected low contrast letter acuity (BC-LCLA). Safety will be assessed up through the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), and changes in safety assessments (e.g., vitals, ECG, C-SSRS).

The study will remain blinded until the study database is locked.

All patients who are discontinued from treatment will complete the End-of-Study (EOS) assessment.

At the end of the Variable Duration Treatment Period, patients will complete an EOS assessment and then may choose either to exit the study, or receive open-label CNM-Au8 in a separate Open-Label Safety Extension Study.

An independent DSMB will be responsible for monitoring the safety of the study on a quarterly basis and ad hoc at the request of the DSMB or the Sponsor (e.g., in the event of unexpected SAEs) to review data throughout the Fixed Duration Treatment Period and the Variable Duration Treatment Period. The DSMB may make recommendations on the conduct of the study, including study termination. Appropriate procedures will be detailed in a DSMB Charter that will define disclosure of any findings along with patient- and study-stopping criteria.

There will be four study periods:

1. A six-week screening period (Screening Period);
2. A fixed 24-week double-blind, randomized treatment period (Fixed Duration Treatment Period);
3. A variable-duration, double-blind treatment period (Variable Duration Treatment Period) where patients continue the previously randomized treatment for up to an additional 24 weeks (total blinded duration of 48- weeks). This period will end for all patients when the last-enrolled patient reaches his or her 24-week visit (LP-24Wk) at which time patients in the Variable Duration Treatment Period will complete the EOS Visit at their next scheduled study visit;
4. A four-week follow-up period (Safety Follow-Up Period) for patients not continuing in the separate Open-Label Long-Term Safety Extension Study.

Following the end of the blinded treatment period, all patients who complete the 24-week Fixed Duration Treatment Period may be eligible to receive open-label CNM-Au8 in a separate Open-Label Long-Term Safety Extension Study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Optic Neuropathy Optic; Neuritis, With Demyelination

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The drug formulations will be identical in appearance (size, shape, volume, color) and smell. The packaging and labeling will be designed to maintain blinding to the Investigator's team and to patients. There are no visible differences between the active drug, and placebo dosing units

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

15mg CNM-Au8

15mg suspension of clean-surfaced, faceted, gold nanocrystals in 60ml of sodium bicarbonate buffered water

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CNM-Au8

Intervention Type DRUG

CNM-Au8 is a dark red/purple-colored liquid formulation consisting of a stable suspension of faceted clean surfaced elemental gold nanocrystals in buffered deionized water with a concentration of up to 0.5 mg/mL of gold. The formulation is buffered by sodium bicarbonate present at a concentration of 0.546 mg/mL. There are no other excipients. The drug product is formulated to be taken orally and will be provided in single dose HDPE containers. The study doses vary by the concentration of gold nanocrystals per milliliter in a volume of 60 mL.

30mg CNM-Au8

30mg suspension of clean-surfaced, faceted, gold nanocrystals in 60ml of sodium bicarbonate buffered water

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CNM-Au8

Intervention Type DRUG

CNM-Au8 is a dark red/purple-colored liquid formulation consisting of a stable suspension of faceted clean surfaced elemental gold nanocrystals in buffered deionized water with a concentration of up to 0.5 mg/mL of gold. The formulation is buffered by sodium bicarbonate present at a concentration of 0.546 mg/mL. There are no other excipients. The drug product is formulated to be taken orally and will be provided in single dose HDPE containers. The study doses vary by the concentration of gold nanocrystals per milliliter in a volume of 60 mL.

Placebo

The matched placebo to be used in this study will consist of water, sodium bicarbonate, and food coloring to match volume and color of the experimental treatments.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo is liquid with identical color and taste

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CNM-Au8

CNM-Au8 is a dark red/purple-colored liquid formulation consisting of a stable suspension of faceted clean surfaced elemental gold nanocrystals in buffered deionized water with a concentration of up to 0.5 mg/mL of gold. The formulation is buffered by sodium bicarbonate present at a concentration of 0.546 mg/mL. There are no other excipients. The drug product is formulated to be taken orally and will be provided in single dose HDPE containers. The study doses vary by the concentration of gold nanocrystals per milliliter in a volume of 60 mL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo is liquid with identical color and taste

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. At least 18 years of age and up to 55 years of age (inclusive) at Screening.
2. Clinical diagnosis of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (meeting McDonald criteria, 2010) who have had RMS no longer than 15 years from diagnosis.
3. Maximum Best Corrected High Contrast Visual Acuity (BC-HCVA) deficit on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart of 20/200 (6/60 metric) in both eyes.

a. BC-HCVA is defined as the last line on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart that a patient is able to read three (3) or more letters correctly.
4. Best Corrected Low Contrast Letter Acuity (BC-LCLA) (by 2.5% Sloan Chart) must be 20/40 (6/12 metric) (inclusive) or worse in the affected eye and 20/32 (6/9.5 metric) or worse in the fellow eye; and the BC-LCLA must be worse than BC-HCVA for the respective value in both eyes.

a. BC-LCLA is defined as the last line on the 2.5% Sloan Chart that a patient is able to read three (3) or more letters correctly.
5. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) thickness ≥ 70 μm.
6. Stable disease activity based on the investigator's judgment over the previous 6 months.
7. All hematological parameters and biochemical parameters that fall outside the Within Normal Limits range must be assessed as Not Clinically Significant (NCS) and deemed stable or transient in nature.
8. Able to understand and give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of AQP4, MOG Ab(+) status, or ≥ 3 segments lesion in the spinal cord.
2. Any diagnosis other than RMS that could explain the patient's signs and symptoms.
3. An acute optic neuritis episode within the prior 6 months.
4. Clinical relapse requiring systemic steroid treatment within the prior 3 months (pre- treatment with systemic steroids during the administration of disease-modifying therapies \[DMT\] may be allowed after discussion with the Sponsor's Medical Monitor but must not be administered within 30 days of a planned VEP or MRI assessment).
5. Unstable treatment with a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) defined as a treatment change within prior 3-months unless due to intolerability.
6. Current treatment with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy other than those approved for the treatment of MS.
7. Any treatment with drugs known or suspected of producing retinal or optic nerve toxicity including hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, clofazimine, vigabatrin, or ethambutol.
8. Any history of ophthalmological cause for retinal damage other than MS (e.g. cataracts, uveitis, macular degeneration, macular exudate, macular edema, glaucoma, severe astigmatism, ocular trauma, neuromyelitis optica, ischemic optic neuropathy, congenital nystagmus, retinal detachment, amblyopia, optic disk drusen).
9. Severe refractive defects: refractive errors (-6 dioptres to +6 dioptres or more in either eye, or axial eye length \>26 mm), hypermetropia (\> 6 dioptres; cylinder \> 3 dioptres); or based on the investigators judgment any other ophthalmic diseases that would confound the study results or assessment of Visual Evoked Potential (VEPs), Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Low Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA), or Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
10. History diabetic retinopathy or a previous diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus or history of prior impaired fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL (or ≥ 200 mg/dL after oral glucose tolerance test).
11. History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HepC) virus antibody, or hepatitis B (HepB) virus antibody.
12. History of gold allergy.
13. Patients taking stimulant medications (including: amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, or modafinil) who have not been on a stable dose greater than or equal to 30 days. Changes to dose will not be allowed during the course of the trial).
14. Patients taking clemastine fumarate, 4-aminopyridine (fampridine), or high dose Biotin (\>300 mg/day).
15. Females who have a positive serum pregnancy test result at Screening or Baseline, or who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to conceive during the study or within 180 days after study completion.
16. History or evidence of substance abuse or alcohol abuse within 5 years prior to Screening, including alcoholism; or severe tobacco use (\>1 pack/day).
17. Clinical history of toxic neuropathy (e.g., secondary to treatment with ethambutol, isoniazid, linezolid, gentamycin, chloramphenicol, vincristine, or penicillamine).
18. Current enrollment in any other drug or device treatment study within 3 months prior to Baseline. Participation in an observational non-interventional study (i.e., no drug or device therapy) is not an exclusion criterion.
19. Inability to undergo any planned study procedures such as LCLA, VEP, MRI, or OCT; history of severe hypersensitivity to gadolinium-DTPA or reduced renal clearance (GFR must be ≥ 45 mL/min at Screening), claustrophobia; or inability to comply with study requirements based on Investigator judgment.
20. Patients with clinically significant hepatic or renal dysfunction or clinical laboratory findings that would limit the interpretability of change in liver or kidney function, or those with low platelet counts (\< 150 x 10\^9 per liter) or eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count of ≥ 500 eosinophils per microliter) at Screening.
21. Based on the investigator's judgment, concurrent chronic or acute illness or unstable medical condition that may deteriorate that could confound the results of safety assessments, increase risk to the patient, or lead to difficulty complying with the protocol; including severe disc edema or hemorrhage, any clinically significant cardiac, endocrinological, hematological, hepatic, immunological, metabolic, urological, pulmonary, neurological (any progressive neurological disorder other than RRMS), dermatological, psychiatric (any untreated or unstable psychiatric disease including depression, bipolar and psychosis), renal, severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions, autoimmune, or other major confounding diseases.
22. Any history of previous malignancy, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix, post documented full resections, with clean margins.
23. Patient is considered a suicide risk in the opinion of the Investigator, has previously made a suicide attempt, or is currently demonstrating active suicidal ideation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clene Australia Pty Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Clene Nanomedicine

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Heidi Beadnall, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sydney

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

John Hunter Hospital

New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Sydney Brain Mind Centre

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Princess Alexandria Hospital

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Menzies Institute for Medical Research

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Alfred Health

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

University of British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CNMAu8.201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.