Does Use of Rapid Response EEG Impact Clinical Decision Making
NCT ID: NCT03534258
Last Updated: 2019-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
164 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-04-30
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Wireless EEG Patch for Continuous Electrographic Monitoring
NCT03583957
Detecting Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures With a Seizure Detection and Warning System in Epilepsy Patients
NCT02371200
Computational Decision Support in Epilepsy Using Retrospective EEG
NCT05384782
Sedline 4 Channel Electroencephalogram (EEG) Monitoring During Suppression of Unilateral Hemispheric Function (Wada Test
NCT02503878
Evaluation of StatNet Device for Electroencephalogram (EEG) Recordings
NCT03103425
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ceribell Rapid Response EEG, Survey
This trial will qualitatively examine how information from rapid response and conventional EEG data changes physicians' diagnostic suspicion or their treatment decisions and confidence levels. In addition, the results will examine the mean time to EEG lead placement, and ease of use.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ceribell Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Rush University Medical Center Pob
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vespa PM, Olson DM, John S, Hobbs KS, Gururangan K, Nie K, Desai MJ, Markert M, Parvizi J, Bleck TP, Hirsch LJ, Westover MB. Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Rapid Response Electroencephalography: The DECIDE Multicenter Prospective Observational Clinical Study. Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):1249-1257. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004428.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1825
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.