Mild Hip Dysplasia

NCT ID: NCT03530878

Last Updated: 2019-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-01

Study Completion Date

2019-01-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hip dysplasia is a complex problem that exists on a spectrum from mild to severe disease. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains the gold standard for most patients with dysplasia; however, the procedure is quite invasive making the decision to proceed in cases of mild disease difficult. Hip arthroscopy (HA) is an alternative minimally invasive technique that can be used to address mild dysplasia. Nevertheless, HA has less capability for correction and in rare instances can exacerbate instability in the dysplastic hip. There is a paucity of data examining outcomes between these two treatment strategies for this challenging problem.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in most patients with closed triradiate cartilage. First developed by Ganz in 1984, this technique utilizes 4 osteotomies to completely mobilize the acetabular fragment 1. Although a technically demanding procedure, it allows optimal correction in all planes and maintains integrity of the posterior column, enabling early weight bearing and mobilization. Several groups have confirmed the long-term efficacy of this joint preservation procedure with a recent report from the inventing institution documented impressive survivorship up to 30 years after surgery 2. Treatment with PAO is more controversial for mild forms of dysplasia where the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) is 18° - 25° and/or the Tӧnnis angle is 8° - 15°. In these patients the delta correction is more limited, thus creating a more unpredictable result with equally invasive surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Dysplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hip Arthroscopy (HA)

This approach addresses intraarticular pathology in the form of labral tears and cartilage that are often concomitant with DDH 3. Furthermore, capsular plication can be performed through HA to reduce instability of the joint.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hip Arthroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intraarticular pathology in the form of labral tears and cartilage that are often concomitant with DDH

Periacetabular Osteootmy (PAO)

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in most patients with closed triradiate cartilage. First developed by Ganz in 1984, this technique utilizes 4 osteotomies to completely mobilize the acetabular fragment 1. Although a technically demanding procedure, it allows optimal correction in all planes and maintains integrity of the posterior column, enabling early weight bearing and mobilization.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hip Arthroscopy

Intraarticular pathology in the form of labral tears and cartilage that are often concomitant with DDH

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of symptomatic mild DDH
* Lateral center-edge angle 18° - 25° and/or Tӧnnis angle 8° - 15°
* Skeletally mature
* Age 18 - 45
* Tonnis Grade 0 or 1 osteoarthritis (minimal or no arthritis)
* Ability to receive a standard of care preoperative MRI arthrogram of the hip

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Neurogenic dysplasia
* Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease
* Previous surgery about the hip including previous hip arthroscopy to address intra-articular pathology
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rafael J. Sierra, M.D.

Professor of Orthopedics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rafael J Sierra

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-007229

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Long Term Results After Hip Arthroscopy
NCT06327217 NOT_YET_RECRUITING