CORset Versus OstéoSynthese in Adult Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

NCT ID: NCT03524209

Last Updated: 2022-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-21

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pyogenic spondylitis in adults is usually treated by antibiotics according to bacteria evidenced in a diagnostic intervertebral disc puncture. Brace treatment is associated in patients presenting back pain and a risk for vertebral body collapse due to infection with subsequent kyphotic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine. Percutaneous minimally invasive posterior spinal instrumentation has evolved over the last decade and indications in infections arouse over the last years. This procedure is interesting as it is performed through small skin incisions only. It avoids paravertebral muscle dissection and thus limits intraoperative bleeding and access morbidity. Recent retrospective data suggests that this internal fixation represents a theoretical advantage over brace treatment by lowering back pain and increasing patient's quality of life in the short run, up to 3 months, but no randomized study was published. The patient's autonomy, including walking ability and daily activities, might improve more rapidly after a percutaneous procedure. Additionally, the sagittal alignment of the thoracolumbar spine could be better maintained by internal fixation, which might prevent progression into kyphosis and improve long-term outcome. The hypothesis is the superiority of percutaneous minimally invasive instrumentation on brace treatment in term of quality of life, back pain and quality of osseous healing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous for the indication of pyogenic spondylitis has been demonstrated retrospectively on small cohort studies, which is in line with our clinical experience. Although this therapeutic concept seems applicable to patients with spondylitis, the theoretical clinical benefit of minimally invasive surgery remains hypothetic and unclear compared to brace treatment, which might still be regarded as the gold standard.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spondylodiscitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A prospective selection of patients with pyogenic spondylitis fulfilling above mentioned inclusion criteria is performed with subsequent randomization into treatment group 1 versus treatment group 2 after informed consent. Group1 are patients treated by minimally invasive surgery and group 2 are patients treated by thoracolumbar brace.

Radiologic deformity assessment is performed on lateral thoracolumbar radiographs in standing position. A modified sagittal index measuring the angulation between cranial endplate of cranial vertebra and caudal endplate of the caudal vertebra as this parameter is normalized to 0°.

Assessment of osteolysis at vertebral bodies on CT expressed as a ratio of vertebral body height in the mid-sagittal plane in comparison to non-infected vertebral bodies adjacent to the index level. Assessment of complete fusion, partial fusion, pseudarthrosis is performed on CT at 1-year FU.

Type and length of antibiotic treatment
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgery

Patients with spondylodiscitis are operated by percutaneous instrumentation and receive an antibiotic treatment according to the bacterium evidenced in the initial diagnostic intervertebral disc puncture (6 weeks to 3 months according to CRP course)

Group Type OTHER

Percutaneous instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine

Intervention Type DEVICE

The spine is stabilized cranially and caudally of the level of spondylodiscitis. The percutaneous instrumentation consists of a rod and pedicle screw construct. The vertebrae are instrumented through minimal skin incisions using a fluoroscopic guidance or a spinal navigation system based on 3D imaging.

Brace

Patients with spondylodiscitis are wearing a thoracolumbar brace for 3 months and receive an antibiotic treatment according to the bacterium evidenced in the initial diagnostic intervertebral disc puncture (6 weeks to 3 months according to CRP course)

Group Type OTHER

Brace

Intervention Type OTHER

Brace treatment is associated in patients presenting back pain and a risk for vertebral body collapse due to infection with subsequent kyphotic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine

The spine is stabilized cranially and caudally of the level of spondylodiscitis. The percutaneous instrumentation consists of a rod and pedicle screw construct. The vertebrae are instrumented through minimal skin incisions using a fluoroscopic guidance or a spinal navigation system based on 3D imaging.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Brace

Brace treatment is associated in patients presenting back pain and a risk for vertebral body collapse due to infection with subsequent kyphotic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

minimal invasive surgery (MIS)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients presenting acute pyogenic spondylitis of the thoracolumbar spine
* back pain at a minimum of 4 out of 10 on VAS
* Diagnostic MRI and disc puncture + microbiological analysis required for antibiotic treatment and/or blood culture
* Vertebral body involvement (osteolysis) \< 50% of VB height documented on CT

Exclusion Criteria

* postoperative pyogenic spondylitis or infection after spinal instrumentation spinal tuberculosis and mycosis
* contra-indications for surgery or general anaesthesia
* general septic conditions acute endocarditis documented by sonography
* patients presenting another major abcess or an epidural abscess
* Absence of vertebral body involvement (osteolysis) on CT or minor VB involvement less than 10% of VB height (surgery not indicated)
* Major destruction of vertebral body (\>50%) on CT (surgery mandatory) Patients with concomitant bacterial endocarditis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yann Philippe CHARLES, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg - Service de chirurgie du rachis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin - Unité d'orthopédie-traumatologie rachis I

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHU de CAEN

Caen, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Beaujon - Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologie

Clichy, , France

Site Status

CHU François Mitterand - Bocage central - Service de Neurochirurgie

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU de GRENOBLE

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHU Lyon - Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer - Service de Neurochirurgie C et chirurgie du rachis

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CHU Marseille - Hôpital Timone - Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Gui de Chauliac - Service de Neurochirurgie

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Central - Service de Neurochirurgie

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU Hôtel Dieu - Service de Neurotraumatologie

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU Nice - Hôpital Pasteur 2 - Unité de Chirurgie Rachidienne

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Pitié - Salpêtrière - Service de Chirurgie orthopédique

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou - Service d'Orthopédie/Traumotologie

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Reims - Hôpital Maison Blanche - Service de Neurochirurgie

Reims, , France

Site Status

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg - Service de chirurgie du rachis

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6751

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Utility of Postoperative Bracing
NCT03947541 COMPLETED NA