Effects of Biofeedback in Patients With Acute Cerebral Infarction
NCT ID: NCT03516227
Last Updated: 2019-10-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-09
2016-08-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of a Real-time Audiovisual Feedback System on CPR Quality
NCT03902873
Impact of Breathing Maneuvers on the Oxygenation Supply of the Heart Assessed With MRI in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
NCT02233634
One Minute Heart Rate Variability Quantification in Airway Obstruction Model
NCT03733704
Vital Signs Monitoring of Emergency Responders in Different States
NCT06076057
Improving Cardiac Arrest Diagnostic Accuracy of Emergency Medical Dispatchers
NCT01872325
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The HRVBF group received four, one-on-one bedside biofeedback training sessions (20-minutes a day for 4 days), and practiced on their own (10-minutes twice a day) using a FDA-regulated, hand-held mobile biofeedback device (StressEraser, Helico Inc., New York, NY, USA).26 The control group received usual care. Afterwards, all participants were telephoned bi-weekly and encouraged to practice slow breathing (HRVBF group) or to perform self-care (control group) for three months. psychological distress, cognitive impairment, ADL capabilities, and autonomic function (represented by HRV) were re-assessed at one, and 3-months after the intervention, by an independent investigator blinded to group assignment.
HRVBF intervention protocol The HRVBF protocol was modified from Lehrer's HRV biofeedback manual.20 A noninvasive visual biofeedback system (NeXus-10 with BioTrace+, Mind Media B.V., Netherlands) and a laptop computer were used for the intervention. Participants in the HRVBF group received four, one-on-one bedside training sessions (20-minutes a day for 4 days). The first session (Day 1) was focused on teaching patients to breath slowly (6-8 breaths-per-minute) and to extend their expiratory phase using pursed-lip breathing. Also, respiration sensors for tracking breathing pace were introduced. The second session (day 2) was focused on teaching patients diaphragmatic breathing in conjunction with pursed-lip breathing, and to use respiratory sensors to pace breathing (6 breaths a minute). The third and fourth sessions (days 3 and 4) were focused on reviewing diaphragmatic breathing, pursed-lip breathing, and teaching patients to breathe in-phase with their heart rate changes. Additionally, participants were encouraged to practice slow diaphragmatic and pursed-lip breathing, on their own, with the aid of the hand-held biofeedback device, for 10 minutes, twice-a-day, during the 4-day training period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HRVBF
Heart rate variability biofeedback
heart rate variability biofeedback
The HRVBF group received four, one-on-one bedside biofeedback training sessions (20-minutes a day for 4 days), and practiced on their own (10-minutes twice a day) using a FDA-regulated, hand-held mobile biofeedback device (StressEraser, Helico Inc., New York, NY, USA).26 The control group received usual care.Afterwards, all participants were telephoned bi-weekly and encouraged to practice slow breathing (HRVBF group) or to perform self-care (control group) for three months.
Control
Usual Care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
heart rate variability biofeedback
The HRVBF group received four, one-on-one bedside biofeedback training sessions (20-minutes a day for 4 days), and practiced on their own (10-minutes twice a day) using a FDA-regulated, hand-held mobile biofeedback device (StressEraser, Helico Inc., New York, NY, USA).26 The control group received usual care.Afterwards, all participants were telephoned bi-weekly and encouraged to practice slow breathing (HRVBF group) or to perform self-care (control group) for three months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yu-Ju Chen
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yu-Ju Chen, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Defense Medical Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NDMCTaiwan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.