Effect of Number of Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning Cycles on Learning Enhancement

NCT ID: NCT03512041

Last Updated: 2019-08-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-13

Study Completion Date

2018-02-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to determine the effect of number of remote limb ischemic conditioning (RLIC) cycles on enhancing learning in neurologically intact young adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is now understood that the nervous system has remarkable adaptive capacity. Specifically, the central nervous system retains its ability to reorganize in structure and function in response to behavioral experience in neurologically intact people and in individuals with neurological injury. Cognitive and motor learning guide the adaptation of the central nervous system and are essential components of effective training paradigms.

There is a growing body of literature which suggests that inducing a transient state of systemic ischemia has the potential to induce spinal plasticity, strengthen spared pathways to motorneurons, and lead to improved motor recovery following neurological injury.1,2 Specifically, daily systemic ischemic conditioning has been shown to improve both forelimb and respiratory motor function in rodent models of chronic cervical spinal injury.1,3 Moreover, systemic ischemic conditioning resulted in increased ankle strength (single session)2 and augmented walking speed and endurance (5 sessions)4 in humans with motor incomplete spinal cord injuries.

In a related area of research, it has been shown that ischemic conditioning administered peripherally represents a strategy for harnessing the body's endogenous protective capabilities against lethal levels of ischemia. With this technique, applying brief ischemia and reperfusion to a remote organ or tissue results in significantly reduced damage from subsequent exposures to ischemia. For example, applying a tourniquet and creating hypoxia in a rat's hindlimb for 10 minutes reduced the extent of cardiac abnormalities following a sustained ischemic insult.5 This same phenomenon has been shown in humans. Applying an inflated blood pressure cuff to the upper or lower limb has shown efficacy for protection in people undergoing cardiac surgeries,6,7 undergoing elective surgery to repair abdominal aortic aneurysm,8 experiencing MI,9 and with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.7

The mechanisms underlying the neuroplastic and neuroprotective effects of ischemic conditioning are not fully understood. At this time, the literature indicates that there are both humoral and neural mechanisms responsible for the protection and the plasticity. It is clear that ischemic conditioning results in widespread physiological effects and that the observed effects work through multiple mechanistic pathways.

The next translational step is to investigate whether combining ischemic conditioning with behavioral training has the ability to augment motor learning. Specifically, we will employ remote limb ischemic conditioning (via inflation/deflation of a blood pressure cuff) with the objective of activating the endogenous pathways shown to elicit neuroplasticity. If eventually effective, RLIC could have profound effect on the rehabilitation and recovery of motor function in people with stroke. It is important to first start this translational investigation in neurologically intact people in order to determine optimal protocols for people with stroke.

The purpose of this study is to test the effect of number of RLIC cycles on motor learning in neurologically intact adults and if we can find a physiological blood marker related to effective administration of RLIC. We hypothesize that 3 cycles of RLIC will be sufficient to enhance motor leaning compared to sham conditioning, and that there will be a dose-dependent (number of cycles) response in learning, thus making training more efficient, more effective, and longer-lasting. Determining the number of cycles necessary to elicit the benefits of RLIC is important in developing the most effective and least burdensome treatment for future patients with motor deficits.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy, Young Adults

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single blinded, randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants will be masked to their group assignment (RLIC or Sham conditioning) throughout the study. Participants will intuitively know the dose (number of cycles) of their assignment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RLIC - 5 Cycles

Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning (RLIC) is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure on the non-dominant arm. 5 Cycles of RLIC requires 45 minutes and involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RLIC - 5 cycles

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

RLIC is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Balance training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 3-7.

Arm training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a cup stacking task, learning to assemble and disassemble cup configurations as fast as they can. Participants perform the cup stacking task 5 trials per day at visits 3-7.

Sequence production training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a discrete sequence production task. Participants learn to associate specific color and shape symbols with sequences of key presses on a keyboard. Participants perform the sequence production task for 10-15 minutes per day at visits 3-7.

RLIC - 4 Cycles

RLIC is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure on the non-dominant arm. 4 Cycles of RLIC requires 35 minutes and involves 4 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RLIC - 4 Cycles

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

RLIC is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Balance training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 3-7.

Arm training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a cup stacking task, learning to assemble and disassemble cup configurations as fast as they can. Participants perform the cup stacking task 5 trials per day at visits 3-7.

Sequence production training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a discrete sequence production task. Participants learn to associate specific color and shape symbols with sequences of key presses on a keyboard. Participants perform the sequence production task for 10-15 minutes per day at visits 3-7.

RLIC - 3 Cycles

RLIC is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure on the non-dominant arm. 3 Cycles of RLIC requires 25 minutes and involves 3 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RLIC - 3 Cycles

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

RLIC is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Balance training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 3-7.

Arm training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a cup stacking task, learning to assemble and disassemble cup configurations as fast as they can. Participants perform the cup stacking task 5 trials per day at visits 3-7.

Sequence production training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a discrete sequence production task. Participants learn to associate specific color and shape symbols with sequences of key presses on a keyboard. Participants perform the sequence production task for 10-15 minutes per day at visits 3-7.

Sham Conditioning

Sham conditioning is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 10 mmHg under diastolic blood pressure on the non-dominant arm. Sham conditioning requires 45 minutes and involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation. Sham conditioning is performed on visits 1-7.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham conditioning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham conditioning is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Balance training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 3-7.

Arm training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a cup stacking task, learning to assemble and disassemble cup configurations as fast as they can. Participants perform the cup stacking task 5 trials per day at visits 3-7.

Sequence production training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants undergo training on a discrete sequence production task. Participants learn to associate specific color and shape symbols with sequences of key presses on a keyboard. Participants perform the sequence production task for 10-15 minutes per day at visits 3-7.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RLIC - 5 cycles

RLIC is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

RLIC - 4 Cycles

RLIC is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

RLIC - 3 Cycles

RLIC is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. RLIC is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham conditioning

Sham conditioning is achieved as listed in the arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is performed on visits 1-7, which occur on consecutive weekdays.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Balance training

All participants undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 3-7.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Arm training

All participants undergo training on a cup stacking task, learning to assemble and disassemble cup configurations as fast as they can. Participants perform the cup stacking task 5 trials per day at visits 3-7.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sequence production training

All participants undergo training on a discrete sequence production task. Participants learn to associate specific color and shape symbols with sequences of key presses on a keyboard. Participants perform the sequence production task for 10-15 minutes per day at visits 3-7.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ischemic conditioning Ischemic conditioning Ischemic conditioning Cup stacking

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1\. Between the age of 18 and 40 years

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of neurological condition (i.e. stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease), ADD, ADHD, balance impairment, or vestibular disorder
2. History of sleep apnea
3. History of lower extremity condition, injury, or surgery which could compromise performance on motor training task
4. Any extremity soft tissue, orthopedic, or vascular injury (i.e. peripheral vascular disease) which may contraindicate RLIC
5. Any cognitive, sensory, or communication problem that would prevent completion of the study
6. Current intensive weight lifting or interval training exercise
7. Current substance abuse or dependence
8. Current use of medication with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors.
9. Unwillingness to travel for all study visits
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Catherine E. Lang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Catherine Lang, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HD085930

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

NIHR01HD085930-Aim2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Improving Walking After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07223710 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Spinal Cord Plasticity
NCT00073606 COMPLETED
Retraining Walking After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT00059553 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Spinal Cord Stimulation and Training
NCT05472584 RECRUITING NA