Use of Gentle Synchronized Negative Pressure in Helping Babies Breathe
NCT ID: NCT03510169
Last Updated: 2023-05-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-02
2024-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The AIM of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying negative pressure NIV, that is synchronized and proportional to the infant's respiratory demand. The preliminary data on feasibility can be used to apply for larger grants from the CIHR, for a study of the NeoVest in smaller premature infants.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neural Control of Non-invasive Ventilation in the Preterm
NCT00368485
Validation of a Novel Oxygen Consumption Measurement Technique in Neonates
NCT03154112
Evaluating Pressures During Non-invasive Ventilation Utilizing NIV Plus Software
NCT05961683
Diaphragm Electrical Activity of Preterm Infants on nCPAP Versus NIHFV
NCT02267018
Application of Lung Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) in Preterm Infants
NCT05961670
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Furthermore, due to the infants' sensitive skin and underdeveloped nasal bridges, continued use of nasal devices can lead to skin breakdown and permanent damage to the nose (3). In order to provide optimal ventilation, these devices must be tight-fitting nasal interfaces to provide a leak-free environment (3). There is also variability in the success of nasal interfaces in providing uniform ventilation. This is because the positive pressure provided at the level of the infants' nostrils is dissipated (through the open mouth, etc.) as it travels down the infants' airways to the alveoli of their lungs (3). Additionally, prolonged use of nasal ventilation methods may impede infant bonding with their mothers via decreased skin-to-skin time, etc. Nasal CPAP is often cited as a reason why feeding (including breastfeeding) is delayed in babies requiring neonatal intensive care stay.
Negative pressure ventilation (NPV) involves the application of sub-atmospheric pressures around the abdomen to displace the diaphragm. It is a unique alternative for administering NIV to infants and would avoid complications associated with nasal interfaces. NPV has previously been used in treating infants with respiratory distress using old-fashioned, large and bulky "iron-lung" devices (4-12). One of the earliest studies using NPV for infants with respiratory failure showed that in a series of 26 patients, NPV provided a sustained increase in PaO2 (5). The infants were a mean gestational age of 32 to 33 weeks and met the criteria for respiratory failure defined by PaO2 \< 40mmHg on 100% inspired oxygen and/or PCO2 \> 70mmHg during bag-mask ventilation (5). Further studies on NPV, continued to show effectiveness in the ventilation of infants with lung disease with improved oxygenation (6-12).
In this study, the investigators propose a novel negative pressure interface and device that is synchronized to the infant's respiratory drive and provides intermittent application of negative pressure. The device utilizes Neurally Adjusted Ventilator Assist (NAVA) technology to achieve synchronization to the infant's underlying respiratory drive and control.
The electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) is measured using a specialized feeding tube catheter with miniaturized sensors at the end. There is a small balloon at the tip of the catheter that measures the gastric pressure which provides evidence that the diaphragm is being displaced. The Edi catheter has been shown in previous work to be effective in delivering both invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation with the FDA-approved NAVA and a variety of interfaces (13-15). The Edi catheter is used routinely in many NICUs worldwide as a conventional nasal or oral catheter.
NAVA is a mode of ventilation that is neurally integrated with the inherent lung protective reflexes by utilizing the information obtained from the Edi catheter. During spontaneous breathing, as lung inflation progresses, stretch receptors in the lungs will eventually sense an adequate inspired volume, and "switch off" inspiration. For a patient on NAVA, where the neural inspiration also controls the assist delivery, the ventilator breath will be cycled-off when neural exhalation begins. Several studies have demonstrated that infants spontaneously choose lower peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) and tidal volume during NAVA compared to conventional ventilation (targeted by the clinician) (16-23).
"Traditional" NAVA is triggered on and off with the Edi and delivers assist proportionally to the Edi on inspiration only. The PEEP is fixed and defined by the clinician. During this "traditional NAVA" there is a fair amount of tonic Edi that is not assisted. With continuous NAVA, the Edi is used to continuously adjust the assist. The Edi controls both the inspiratory and expiratory assist. A safety and tolerance study in 20 preterm infants using neutrally adjusted PEEP (neuroPAP) was done using nasal prongs as the delivery interface (See Appendix 2).
In this study, the investigators plan to control a negative pressure delivery device (NeoVest) to deliver synchronized negative NIV for a short period of time. Preliminary data in small rats (\~400g) and larger rabbits (\~3-4kg) have demonstrated feasibility and efficacy in experimental conditions mimicking neonatal respiratory distress (See Appendix 3). The Neovest was able to generate multiple effective levels of ventilator support in these animals with no side effects.
The NeoVest delivery device is a wearable vest/shell that surrounds the infant's abdomen. It was developed using serial body measurements of infants previously admitted to the St. Michael's Hospital NICU (REB #15-183). It gently pulls on the abdomen by applying negative pressure, thereby displacing the diaphragm. The materials used for the NeoVest are lightweight and suitable for the infants' sensitive skin.
The AIM of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying negative pressure NIV, that is synchronized and proportional to the infant's respiratory demand. The preliminary data on feasibility can be used to apply for larger grants from the CIHR, for a study of the NeoVest in smaller premature infants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NeoVest
Negative pressure ventilation using NeoVest
NeoVest
Negative pressure ventilation with NeoVest
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NeoVest
Negative pressure ventilation with NeoVest
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \>1.5kg birthweight
* Clinically stable, with symptoms of respiratory distress (due to transient tachypnea of the newborn, respiratory distress syndrome, etc.)
* Stable on nasal CPAP (5-8cm H2O) for a minimum of 6 hours
* Within the first two weeks of life
Exclusion Criteria
* Infants with clinically significant apnoea or bradycardia (\> 2 A\&B in last hour, or apnea \>20 sec, or bradycardia requiring significant stimulation)
* Infants with hemodynamic instability (mean BP \< weeks GA), or any infant requiring fluid boluses and/or inotropic medications
* Infants with genetic conditions or dysmorphic facial features
* Infants that have been recently extubated in the last 48 hours
* Infants in whom placement of the NG tube is contra-indicated
* Infants with any clinical suspicion of upper airway distress such as symptoms of stridor
* Infants with abdominal wall defects and other visible abnormalities of the abdomen or chest
* Infants with umbilical arterial and/or venous catheters
* Infants that have allergies and/or previous skin reactions to silicone based materials
6 Hours
2 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Douglas Campbell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unity Health Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Michael's Hospital NICU
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-282Neovest
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.