Cephalic Spread of Block With Head Down Tilt in Spinal Anaesthesia - A Randomised Controlled Study
NCT ID: NCT03491319
Last Updated: 2018-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-01
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Spinal Flexion in the Lateral Decubitus Position on the Unilaterality During Spinal Anesthesia
NCT01321684
The Effect of Spinal Column Flexion on Unilaterality of Spinal Anesthesia
NCT06293404
A Comparative Analysis of Combined Superficial Cervical Plexus and Supraorbital Blocks Compared to Scalp Blocks During Craniotomy: a Review of Opioid Consumption and The Suppression of Hemodynamic Responses
NCT07131046
Pre-post Spinal Popliteal Block
NCT05354791
Circumferential Spread of Anesthetic and Success in Sciatic Nerve Blockade
NCT00802581
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Operation theatre table tilts have been used to influence the spread of hyperbaric solution to ultimately influence the final height of the block. Studies have shown that a 10 degree head down tilt can result in cephalad spread of analgesia when compared to the horizontal group. So, in cases where the spinal block level was not high enough to perform a given surgery, the Trendelenburg position has been used to extend the level of the block. Hence, it is assumed that a higher level of block can be achieved with a smaller volume of the local anaesthetic agent, thus reducing the side effects. But others have noted that there was no statistically significant increase in the level of block even with 15 degree head down tilt.
In spite of this, anesthesiologists give various degrees of head down tilt which they believe is both safe for the patient and will result in adequate level of block. Often these are arbitrarily done by the operator as most of the operation theatre tables are not equipped with any device to measure the accurate degree of tilt.
An application called clinometer that utilizes the gyroscope sensor and determines the plane of the gadget in vertical as well as horizontal directions has been described. This application can be used to measure the exact degree of tilt given after sub arachnoid block.
As there is no agreement on the effect of Trendelenberg position on height of subarachnoid block, the current clinical study will be undertaken to estimate the effect of operation theatre table tilt at the time of lumbar puncture on the height of subarachnoid block.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group C Control
spinal anaesthesia was given with table in neutral positon. Same position was maintained after spinal anaesthesia
Group C - neutral
spinal anaesthesia was given with table in neutral positon. Patient was maintained in supine position for 10 minutes following spinal anaesthesia
Group X
spinal anaesthesia was given with table in neutral positon. 10 degree head low position was maintained for 10 minutes following spinal
Group X - head low tilt
spinal anaesthesia was given with table in neutral positon. 10 degree head low position was maintained for 10 minutes following spinal anaesthesia
Group Y
the table was put in 10 degree head low position before proceeding to give spinal anaesthesia. Head low position was maintained for 10 minutes following spinal
Group Y - head low tilt
the table was put in 10 degree head low position before proceeding to give spinal anaesthesia. Head low position was maintained for 10 minutes following spinal
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group X - head low tilt
spinal anaesthesia was given with table in neutral positon. 10 degree head low position was maintained for 10 minutes following spinal anaesthesia
Group Y - head low tilt
the table was put in 10 degree head low position before proceeding to give spinal anaesthesia. Head low position was maintained for 10 minutes following spinal
Group C - neutral
spinal anaesthesia was given with table in neutral positon. Patient was maintained in supine position for 10 minutes following spinal anaesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* contraindicated for spinal anaesthesia
* allergy to local anaesthetic agents used
* obesity (body mass index \>29 kg/m2)
* Pregnancy
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nitte University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Sara Jaison
Junior Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sripada Mehandale, MBBS, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Associate Professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493.
Sinclair CJ, Scott DB, Edstrom HH. Effect of the trendelenberg position on spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1982 May;54(5):497-500. doi: 10.1093/bja/54.5.497.
Dixit RB, Neema MM. Use of an Android application "clinometer" for measurement of head down tilt given during subarachnoid block. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):29-32. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.169471.
Kim JT, Shim JK, Kim SH, Jung CW, Bahk JH. Trendelenburg position with hip flexion as a rescue strategy to increase spinal anaesthetic level after spinal block. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):396-400. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael370. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
Hocking G, Wildsmith JA. Intrathecal drug spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Oct;93(4):568-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh204. Epub 2004 Jun 25. No abstract available.
Miyabe M, Namiki A. The effect of head-down tilt on arterial blood pressure after spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1993 Mar;76(3):549-52. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199303000-00017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
nitteU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.