Disease-Modifying Treatments for Myasthenia Gravis

NCT ID: NCT03490539

Last Updated: 2021-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

167 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-07

Study Completion Date

2021-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to address the evidence gaps in a real-world setting and help patients with MG choose treatments that are best suited to them. It is a prospective, multicenter observational cohort study of comparative effectiveness of MG treatments, with a patient-centered primary outcome measure, to guide clinicians, patients and payers regarding the choice of treatment options for this chronic and serious disease.

Primary: To compare the effectiveness of azathioprine (AZT) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

Secondary: To compare the outcomes in patients receiving an adequate dose and duration of AZT or MMF over the 2-3 year study period, vs. patients not receiving adequate doses and duration of these agents

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design \& procedures - This is an observational study in the real world clinical setting to evaluate immunosuppressive treatment (IS) of myasthenia gravis (MG). Patients with acquired autoimmune MG ≥ 18 years of age who are not on IS agents, and have not been on corticosteroids for at least 30 days will be enrolled at 20 sites in the US and Canada. These patients will be treated according to the physician's judgment and patient preferences as in routine clinical practice. Patients will be followed prospectively, with the frequency of clinical visits and laboratory monitoring determined by the treating physician, which may differ among patients. Standard outcome measures measuring efficacy and adverse effects that are used in clinical practice will be collected, with emphasis on patient reported outcomes. Informed consent will be obtained using an approved consent form. Patient identifiable / clinical information from the medical record, including the study outcome measures will be uploaded to a centralized REDCap database. The investigators plan to recruit 220 patients, adjusting for a 10% drop out rate, with a final sample of 200 patients for analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neurological Disorder Autoimmune Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

azathioprine (AZT)

Patients with MG who are receiving azathioprine as part of routine clinical care

Azathioprine

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablet

mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)

Patients with MG who are receiving mycophenolate mofetil as part of routine clinical care

Mycophenolate Mofetil

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mycophenolate Mofetil

oral tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Azathioprine

oral tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cellcept Imuran

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Participants eligible for inclusion in this study must fulfill all of the following criteria:

1. Age ≥ 18 years of age
2. Acquired autoimmune MG, with weakness and confirmed by one or more of the following:

1. Elevated AChR or MuSK antibodies
2. Unequivocal response to cholinesterase inhibitors
3. Abnormal RNS or increased jitter (without nerve or muscle disease sufficient to produce a decrement or increased jitter)
3. Patients seen initially at the participating center after January 1, 2017.
4. Patients on pyridostigmine at the first evaluation at the participating center ("baseline visit") may be included if pyridostigmine was started ≤3 months before the baseline visit.
5. Patients who received corticosteroids \>90 days prior to baseline visit for a non-MG indication may be included. (Patients who have received corticosteroids for a non-MG indication between 31 and 90 days before baseline visit will be evaluated by the primary investigators on a case by case basis to determine if the extent and dose of corticosteroid could have impacted the course of MG or symptoms of MG.)

Exclusion Criteria

Patients fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study. No additional exclusions may be applied by the investigator, in order to ensure that the study population will be representative of all eligible participants.

1. Patients with non-autoimmune MG (congenital myasthenic syndromes, drug-induced MG)
2. Patients on immunosuppressive agents at the baseline visit.
3. Patients who have previously received steroids for the treatment of MG.
4. Patients with steroid use for a non-MG indication \< 30 days prior to the baseline visit.
5. Patients with previous thymectomy, IVIg or plasma exchange, or treatment with a non-steroidal immunosuppressive agent (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil cyclosporine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, rituximab, or any investigational immunosuppressive agent). Patients who have outcomes measured within 24 hours after initiation of IVIg or PLEX are acceptable.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffery Guptill, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Donald Sanders, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Pushpa Narayanaswami, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Unversity of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Clinic Foundation

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St. Elizabeth's Medical Center

Brighton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University at Buffalo, SUNY

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Vermont - Larner College of Medicine

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

University of Alberta Hospital, Faculty of Medicine

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Deenen JC, Horlings CG, Verschuuren JJ, Verbeek AL, van Engelen BG. The Epidemiology of Neuromuscular Disorders: A Comprehensive Overview of the Literature. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2015;2(1):73-85.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28198707 (View on PubMed)

Sanders DB, Wolfe GI, Narayanaswami P. Author response: International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: Executive summary. Neurology. 2017 Jan 31;88(5):505-506. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003570. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28138082 (View on PubMed)

Burns TM, Sadjadi R, Utsugisawa K, Gwathmey KG, Joshi A, Jones S, Bril V, Barnett C, Guptill JT, Sanders DB, Hobson-Webb L, Juel VC, Massey J, Gable KL, Silvestri NJ, Wolfe G, Cutter G, Nagane Y, Murai H, Masuda M, Farrugia ME, Carmichael C, Birnbaum S, Hogrel JY, Nafissi S, Fatehi F, Ou C, Liu W, Conaway M. International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Dec;54(6):1015-1022. doi: 10.1002/mus.25198. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27220659 (View on PubMed)

Mullins LL, Carpentier MY, Paul RH, Sanders DB; Muscle Study Group. Disease-specific measure of quality of life for myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2008 Aug;38(2):947-56. doi: 10.1002/mus.21016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18697209 (View on PubMed)

Burns TM, Grouse CK, Wolfe GI, Conaway MR, Sanders DB; MG Composite and MG-OL15 Study Group. The MG-QOL15 for following the health-related quality of life of patients with myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2011 Jan;43(1):14-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.21883.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21082698 (View on PubMed)

Jaretzki A 3rd, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM, Kaminski HJ, Keesey JC, Penn AS, Sanders DB. Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology. 2000 Jul 12;55(1):16-23. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.1.16. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10891897 (View on PubMed)

Burns TM, Conaway M, Sanders DB; MG Composite and MG-QOL15 Study Group. The MG Composite: A valid and reliable outcome measure for myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2010 May 4;74(18):1434-40. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dc1b1e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20439845 (View on PubMed)

Sadjadi R, Conaway M, Cutter G, Sanders DB, Burns TM; MG Composite MG-QOL15 Study Group. Psychometric evaluation of the myasthenia gravis composite using Rasch analysis. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jun;45(6):820-5. doi: 10.1002/mus.23260.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22581534 (View on PubMed)

Burns TM, Conaway MR, Cutter GR, Sanders DB; Muscle Study Group. Construction of an efficient evaluative instrument for myasthenia gravis: the MG composite. Muscle Nerve. 2008 Dec;38(6):1553-62. doi: 10.1002/mus.21185.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19016543 (View on PubMed)

Wolfe GI, Herbelin L, Nations SP, Foster B, Bryan WW, Barohn RJ. Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile. Neurology. 1999 Apr 22;52(7):1487-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.7.1487.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10227640 (View on PubMed)

Sanders DB, Tucker-Lipscomb B, Massey JM. A simple manual muscle test for myasthenia gravis: validation and comparison with the QMG score. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Sep;998:440-4. doi: 10.1196/annals.1254.057. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14592912 (View on PubMed)

Gilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ. Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Oct;14(10):1023-36. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00145-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26376969 (View on PubMed)

Bang H, Robins JM. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):962-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16401269 (View on PubMed)

Li F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM. Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2016;(In press).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Crump RK. Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 2009;96(1):187-199.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Meriggioli MN, Sanders DB. Disorders of Neuromuscular Transmission. In: Bradley WG, Daroff RB, Fenichel GM, Jankovic J, Mazziotta JC, editors. Neurology in Clinical Practice. 6 ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012. p 2046-2065.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Narayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Thomas L, Thibault D, Blevins J, Desai R, Krueger A, Bibeau K, Liu B, Guptill JT; PROMISE-MG Study Group. Comparative effectiveness of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis (PROMISE-MG): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2024 Mar;23(3):267-276. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00028-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38365379 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.03

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00087883

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.