Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-01
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients With COPD in Primary Care
NCT00440687
Inhaled Corticosteroid Withdrawal in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT00975195
Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Primary Care Patients With COPD
NCT02691988
Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids on Sputum Bacterial Load in COPD
NCT01213693
An Investigation of the Mechanism of Action of Seretide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT00974805
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the UK, inhaled corticosteroids are indicated for patients with severe or very severe COPD (Forced expiratory volume in 1 second \<50% predicted) who experience frequent exacerbations. International guidelines and strategies such as those from Global Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), also suggest inhaled corticosteroids should be reserved for patients with frequent exacerbations despite appropriate treatment with inhaled bronchodilators such as combined long acting beta-agonists and long acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA combinations). Despite this guidance, use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with milder COPD and without a history of exacerbations is common. Randomised controlled trials suggest that inhaled corticosteroids can be withdrawn from COPD patients with minimal adverse effects. Attempts to reduce inappropriate ICS prescribing have been largely unsuccessful in real-life, however, because of "non-evidence barriers". These include a lack of expertise in general practice to identify patients suitable for ICS withdrawal, fear of adrenal insufficiency, concern about missing a diagnosis of asthma and time. A high proportion of COPD care in the United Kingdom is delivered by specialist practice nurses, who may not be empowered to withdraw ICS in the absence of specific guidance or protocols.
The SWIFT trial is a cluster randomised trial to determine if a patient identification, feedback and ICS withdrawal intervention in primary care can result in more appropriate inhaled corticosteroid use without increasing the frequency of exacerbations. Practices in Tayside and Fife will be randomised at practice level to an intervention or control. The intervention will consist of electronic review of patients COPD data and prescribing history, followed by implementation of a medication change involving withdrawal of ICS and introduction of a LABA/LAMA for patients without an indication for ongoing ICS treatment. Patients in control practices will not receive the intervention, but practices will be provided with local guidelines and formulary and encouraged to prescribe appropriately. Patients in the control practices may be switched to guideline compliant medications (which may include the withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids).
Our hypothesis is that the above "non-evidence barriers" will result in an ongoing high inappropriate use of ICS in control practices while an intervention that overcomes these will result in high rates of ICS withdrawal and that the intervention will be safe, as evidenced by no increase in the frequency of exacerbations over 12 months of follow-up.
This study will make an important contribution to understanding the role of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD. If successful, the intervention could be safely applied throughout the NHS to reduce inappropriate medication use, reduce patient side effects and healthcare costs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal
Patients meeting the study criteria for withdrawal will have their ICS containing regime changed to a LABA/LAMA regime without ICS.
ICS withdrawal protocol
A primary care intervention to support switch from ICS containing regimen to non-ICS containing regimen in appropriate patients.
Standard care
Patients will continue on their current recommended regimen including ICS.
Standard care
Normal clinically indicated inhaled therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ICS withdrawal protocol
A primary care intervention to support switch from ICS containing regimen to non-ICS containing regimen in appropriate patients.
Standard care
Normal clinically indicated inhaled therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A clinical diagnosis of COPD made by a physician
* Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio at screening of \<70%
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with COPD receiving inhaled short acting beta-2 agonist only.
* Residence outwith Tayside and Fife
* Insufficient data available to determine appropriateness of ICS and other medication use.
* Known previous failure of inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal
* Patients should be excluded if, in the opinion of the practice, making changes to their current COPD treatment regime is not in the patients best interests.
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Fife
OTHER_GOV
NHS Tayside
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philip M Short
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Tayside
Devesh Dhasmana
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Fife
Arlene Shaw
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
NHS Tayside
Fiona Eastop
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
NHS Tayside
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NHS Tayside
Dundee, Perthshire, United Kingdom
NHS FIfe
Kirkcaldy, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016RC23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.