Assessing Optimal Inhaler Strategies During Acute Exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) Using Oscillometry

NCT ID: NCT06495047

Last Updated: 2024-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-19

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a persistent lung disease that makes it very difficult to breathe. The airways and the normally 'spongy' lungs themselves are affected. The main treatment is puffers, some which are long-acting (to control persistent symptoms) and some which are short-acting ('rescue' puffers when suddenly feeling short-of-breath). Beyond persisting breathlessness at rest, people with COPD can also experience dangerous "lung-attacks" which can require urgent care visits or even hospitalization for treatment. Amazingly, although COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide, and COPD lung-attacks are a leading cause of hospitalization in Canada, investigators are still unsure which combination of puffers is most effective at treating lung-attacks.

The main objective is to determine which puffer treatment combination (just short-acting, or both short-acting and long-acting) best opens up the lungs to airflow during COPD lung-attacks.

A test called oscillometry, which requires only quiet breathing and is so safe that it is regularly used in children, toddlers and even infants, will be used to measure lung function changes. All eligible people with COPD receiving urgent lung-attack treatment who agree to participate will perform three rounds of oscillometry: before any puffers, after only short-acting puffers, and finally after long-acting puffers are also added on. Any potential evidence of side effects will be collected from the chart. Oscillometry tests will be compared to see which puffer strategy best improves flow in the airways.

Part of the reason why this has not been well-studied so far is that the standard breathing test, spirometry, requires multiple rounds of forceful breathing which is very difficult, even distressing, for many people with COPD (at rest, let alone during a lung-attack). No studies have ever properly studied which puffer strategy is most effective for lung-attacks. The investigators have experience and expertise with oscillometry, the most appropriate test in this setting, to answer this pressing question.

This research addresses an important treatment knowledge gap for this very common lung disease. These results could influence how patients with COPD around the world are treated during lung-attacks so that they can breathe better, sooner.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Three sets of carefully timed oscillometry and dyspnea score measurements will be performed: 1) at "baseline", before the participant receives their scheduled dose of LABD and roughly 4 hours following a scheduled dose of SABD; 2) between 15-20 min after having received their next scheduled dose of SABD and just preceding their next scheduled dose of LABD (SABD only); and 3) after having received the scheduled dose of LABD and between 25-35min of the most recent SABD administration (LABD + SABD), such that there is overlap in the time window of SABD and LABD onset at the time of the third set of testing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD COPD Exacerbation Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COPD cohort

Males and females aged 40 or greater with any severity of airflow obstruction (GOLD 1-4) who are currently experiencing and receiving treatment for a physician-diagnosed acute exacerbation (AECOPD) with both long-acting and short-acting bronchodilators prescribed by the treating team.

Long-acting bronchodilator therapy (LABD)

Intervention Type DRUG

Long-acting inhaler therapy

Short-acting bronchodilator therapy (SABD)

Intervention Type DRUG

Short-acting inhaler therapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Long-acting bronchodilator therapy (LABD)

Long-acting inhaler therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Short-acting bronchodilator therapy (SABD)

Short-acting inhaler therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males and females, age ≥ 40, who are former/current smokers with a ≥10 pack-year smoking history.
2. COPD previously confirmed by spirometry (FEV1/FVC \< 0.7) of any severity (GOLD 1-4).
3. Currently experiencing and receiving treatment for a physician-diagnosed AECOPD with both long-acting and short-acting bronchodilators prescribed by their treating team.
4. Ability to participate without supplemental oxygen during the oscillometry tests.
5. Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. No COPD diagnosis.
2. AECOPD is not the principal cause of urgent care visit, emergency department visit, or hospitalization.
3. Treatment strategy in which LABDs were held by the treating medical team (SABD-only approach).
4. Participant already performed spirometry on the same day of testing.
5. Inability to provide informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MEI/MES I&P Program (McGill University, Thorasys Inc.)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bryan Ross

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bryan A. Ross, MD, FRCPC, MSc (Epi, Physiol)

Role: CONTACT

(514) 843-1465

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bryan A Ross, MD, FRCPC, MSc (Epi, Physiol)

Role: primary

514-934-1934

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-10445

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.