Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT)
NCT ID: NCT03483493
Last Updated: 2021-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
224 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-07
2021-04-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary objective: to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of BiP Tic, a therapist-guided, parent-assisted, internet-based behavioural therapy intervention for tics in young people, compared with usual care plus online education.
Secondary objectives include 1) optimising the design of the intervention, 2) undertaking an internal pilot, 3) evaluating cost effectiveness and 4) longer term impact, and 5) identifying barriers to implementation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Parent Behavioral Training for Disruptive Behaviors in Tourette Syndrome
NCT02882490
Group Intervention for Children With Chronic Tics Syndrome or Tourette Syndrome: CBIT vs Psycho-Educational Intervention
NCT02407951
Activity in Tourette Syndrome
NCT02153463
Computerized Working Memory Training in Children With ADHD and Comorbid Tourette Syndrome
NCT02732496
Efficacy of Psychotherapy Treatment of Children With Tics
NCT02144870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Families that are eligible and want to take part are randomly allocated to one of two treatments. One treatment uses behavioural therapy (BT), the other involves psychoeducation. Both treatments last for 10-weeks and involve completing online chapters (for the parent and child) with the support of a therapist, there are also some tasks to complete offline. After finishing the treatment, families are asked to complete more questionnaires (at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after starting the treatment). A smaller sample of families and healthcare professionals are also interviewed about their experience of participation. The study is looking to see if the online delivered treatment may be effective at helping children and young people manage their tics. The study is also exploring whether the online programme is acceptable to families, identifying any problems in getting families to take part/complete the programme and also healthcare professionals' views about the programme. It is important to research online therapy for tics because, at the moment, many people with tics do not get any therapy because there are not enough trained tic therapists. If online delivered treatment is effective, this may mean more children and young people could access tic therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exposure Response Prevention for tics
10-weeks, online delivered, therapist supported exposure response prevention (ERP) therapy for tics
Exposure Response Prevention for tics
The intervention consists of evidence-based interventions adapted from previously published treatment manuals on Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) and established behavioural intervention for tics protocols. Each of the 10 modules includes age-appropriate texts, animations and exercises. Prticipants are instructed to practice suppressing their tics, this is known as 'response prevention'. Then, with the help of their parent/carer, the participant is instructed to provoke premonitory urges (the urge to tic often felt before the tic is expressed) and try to supress the need to express/demonstrate the tic, this known as 'exposure'.
Active Control (Psychoeducation)
10-weeks, online delivered, therapist supported psychoeducation for tics
Psychoeducation for tics
The comparator intervention reviews the definition of tics, natural history, common presentations, prevalence, aetiology, risks and protective factors and strategies for describing tics to other people etc. Problem-solving and development of expertise in tic disorders is emphasised. The intervention includes strategies for promoting positive behaviours which will be rewarded by a parent as a parallel element to the tic control practice in the behavioural therapy arm. There is no information on tic control within the management package.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exposure Response Prevention for tics
The intervention consists of evidence-based interventions adapted from previously published treatment manuals on Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) and established behavioural intervention for tics protocols. Each of the 10 modules includes age-appropriate texts, animations and exercises. Prticipants are instructed to practice suppressing their tics, this is known as 'response prevention'. Then, with the help of their parent/carer, the participant is instructed to provoke premonitory urges (the urge to tic often felt before the tic is expressed) and try to supress the need to express/demonstrate the tic, this known as 'exposure'.
Psychoeducation for tics
The comparator intervention reviews the definition of tics, natural history, common presentations, prevalence, aetiology, risks and protective factors and strategies for describing tics to other people etc. Problem-solving and development of expertise in tic disorders is emphasised. The intervention includes strategies for promoting positive behaviours which will be rewarded by a parent as a parallel element to the tic control practice in the behavioural therapy arm. There is no information on tic control within the management package.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Suspected or confirmed Tourette syndrome/ chronic tic disorder:
\- Including Moderate/severe tics: Score \>15 on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) Total Tic Severity Score (TTSS); TTSS score\>10 if motor or vocal tics only: researcher confirms at screening appointment
3. Competent to provide written, informed consent (parental consent for child aged \<16): researcher confirms at screening appointment.
4. Broadband internet access and regular PC/ laptop/Mac user, with mobile phone SMS: patient confirmed through screening.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Change to medication for tics (start or stop tic medication) within the previous 2 months: Patient confirmed through screening and subsequent medication/interventions commenced throughout out the trial are recorded at each time point for analysis.
3. Diagnoses of alcohol/substance dependence, psychosis, suicidality, or anorexia nervosa: Confirmed through parent DAWBA. DAWBAs that score people as being likely to have these conditions will be second reviewed by the CI (who is a medical expert) to ascertain that they should definitely be excluded from the trial. If the child is considered at immediate risk of suicide, the research team will inform the GP or usual treating clinician.
4. Moderate/severe intellectual disability: Confirmed through qualitative judgement of the assessor at the telephone screen (and confirmed at baseline through CAIDS-Q) through questions relating to type of school the child attends and previous diagnoses.
5. Immediate risk to self or others: Confirmed through screening questions and DAWBA. The participants GP will be informed of this.
6. Parent or child not able to speak or read/write English: Patient confirmed through screening by the assessor.
9 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College, London
OTHER
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
University of Nottingham
OTHER
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chris Hollis, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nottingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Nottingham, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hollis C, Hall CL, Jones R, Marston L, Novere ML, Hunter R, Brown BJ, Sanderson C, Andren P, Bennett SD, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Evans A, Kouzoupi N, McKenzie C, Heyman I, Khan K, Kilgariff J, Glazebrook C, Mataix-Cols D, Murphy T, Serlachius E, Murray E. Therapist-supported online remote behavioural intervention for tics in children and adolescents in England (ORBIT): a multicentre, parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;8(10):871-882. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00235-2. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
Hall CL, Le Novere M, Murphy T, McNally E, Hollis C, Hunter R. Healthcare utilisation and costs associated with poor access to diagnosis and treatment for children and young people with tic disorders. BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Nov 7;27(1):e301241. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301241.
Hollis C, Hall CL, Khan K, Le Novere M, Marston L, Jones R, Hunter R, Brown BJ, Sanderson C, Andren P, Bennett SD, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Evans A, Kouzoupi N, McKenzie C, Heyman I, Kilgariff J, Glazebrook C, Mataix-Cols D, Serlachius E, Murray E, Murphy T. Online remote behavioural intervention for tics in 9- to 17-year-olds: the ORBIT RCT with embedded process and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2023 Oct;27(18):1-120. doi: 10.3310/CPMS3211.
Hollis C, Hall CL, Khan K, Jones R, Marston L, Le Novere M, Hunter R, Andren P, Bennett SD, Brown BJ, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Evans A, Kouzoupi N, McKenzie C, Sanderson C, Heyman I, Kilgariff J, Glazebrook C, Mataix-Cols D, Serlachius E, Murray E, Murphy T. Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of a therapist-supported online remote behavioural intervention for tics in children and adolescents: extended 12- and 18-month follow-up of a single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;64(6):941-951. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13756. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
Hall CL, Marston L, Khan K, Brown BJ, Sanderson C, Andren P, Bennett S, Heyman I, Mataix-Cols D, Serlachius E, Hollis C, Murphy T. The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on tic symptoms in children and young people: a prospective cohort study. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Dec;54(6):1499-1509. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01348-1. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
Hall CL, Sanderson C, Brown BJ, Andren P, Bennett S, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Khan K, Kouzoupi N, Mataix-Cols D, McKenzie C, Murphy T, Townsend M, Hollis C, Murray E. Opportunities and challenges of delivering digital clinical trials: lessons learned from a randomised controlled trial of an online behavioural intervention for children and young people. Trials. 2020 Dec 9;21(1):1011. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04902-1.
Khan K, Hollis C, Hall CL, Davies EB, Mataix-Cols D, Andren P, Murphy T, Brown BJ, Murray E, Glazebrook C. Protocol for the Process Evaluation of the Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT) randomized controlled trial for children and young people. Trials. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3974-3.
Hall CL, Davies EB, Andren P, Murphy T, Bennett S, Brown BJ, Brown S, Chamberlain L, Craven MP, Evans A, Glazebrook C, Heyman I, Hunter R, Jones R, Kilgariff J, Marston L, Mataix-Cols D, Murray E, Sanderson C, Serlachius E, Hollis C; ORBIT Trial team.. Investigating a therapist-guided, parent-assisted remote digital behavioural intervention for tics in children and adolescents-'Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics' (ORBIT) trial: protocol of an internal pilot study and single-blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 3;9(1):e027583. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027583.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hollis201117
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.