Voluntary Drug Poisoning by Psychoactive Molecules: Identify Cognitive Markers
NCT ID: NCT03481192
Last Updated: 2018-03-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
103 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-02
2019-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
New Psychoactive Substances in Intoxicated Patients During the Winter Activities
NCT04155281
Epidemiology of Acute Self-poisoning in Emergency Services in France
NCT02518386
Divided Drug Delivery
NCT02869724
Identification of Psychoactive Substance Users in Young Adults (16 to 25 Years Old) Visiting the Emergency Department
NCT04173546
Registration of Tobacco, Coffee and Substance Use Among Acutely Admitted Psychiatric Patients
NCT00184184
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The second step will be able to relate the memory score of the predictor variables. To achieve this, it will perform a multivariate linear regression in each group in order to confirm the results of the pilot study and to be able to regress in the control group which was not possible in the pilot study because of the lack of effective.
Finally, this study will try to establish, using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, thresholds for cognitive scores and begin to develop a tool for clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
A group of patients admitted for IMV exclusively using amnesic substances.
A control group admitted for IMV and ingested exclusively non-amnesic
Two visits, the first one for the first evaluation of cognitive functions directly following the psychiatric interview (E1), and the second one at 24h-48h after the psychiatric evaluation (E2)
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A group using amnesic substances
A group of patients admitted for IMV exclusively using amnesic substances. Benzodiazepines, benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants, neuroleptics, antihistamines, other atropine substances, anti-epileptics and opiates.
Two visits for evaluation, the first one for the first evaluation of cognitive functions directly following the psychiatric interview, and the second one at 24h-48h of the psychiatric evaluation (T2), a second evaluation (E2) will take place.
Two visits for evaluation
Visit 1:The first evaluation (E1) of cognitive functions will take place directly following the psychiatric interview (T1), in order to better reflect the cognitive abilities at the time of the proposal of the care project.
This will include the Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ), the five words of DUBOIS, the TMT-A and B, the WAIS code test, and the BADDELEY door test. An intercurrent type ringing event of the phone will take place during this evaluation.
Visit 2: At 24h-48h of the psychiatric evaluation (T2), a second evaluation (E2) will take place.
An episodic memory score will be determined by asking the patient to recall,as precisely as possible the evaluation E1. At first the reminder will be free,the data can be completed, if necessary, with an indication, a recognition.
A control group
A control group that ingested exclusively non-amnesic substances among them most frequently ingested in this context, ie the following classes: level 1 analgesics, antibiotics, serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants, oral antidiabetic, thyroid hormones, anti oral coagulant.
Two visits for evaluation, the first one for the first evaluation of cognitive functions directly following the psychiatric interview, and the second one at 24h-48h of the psychiatric evaluation (T2), a second evaluation (E2) will take place.
Two visits for evaluation
Visit 1:The first evaluation (E1) of cognitive functions will take place directly following the psychiatric interview (T1), in order to better reflect the cognitive abilities at the time of the proposal of the care project.
This will include the Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ), the five words of DUBOIS, the TMT-A and B, the WAIS code test, and the BADDELEY door test. An intercurrent type ringing event of the phone will take place during this evaluation.
Visit 2: At 24h-48h of the psychiatric evaluation (T2), a second evaluation (E2) will take place.
An episodic memory score will be determined by asking the patient to recall,as precisely as possible the evaluation E1. At first the reminder will be free,the data can be completed, if necessary, with an indication, a recognition.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Two visits for evaluation
Visit 1:The first evaluation (E1) of cognitive functions will take place directly following the psychiatric interview (T1), in order to better reflect the cognitive abilities at the time of the proposal of the care project.
This will include the Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ), the five words of DUBOIS, the TMT-A and B, the WAIS code test, and the BADDELEY door test. An intercurrent type ringing event of the phone will take place during this evaluation.
Visit 2: At 24h-48h of the psychiatric evaluation (T2), a second evaluation (E2) will take place.
An episodic memory score will be determined by asking the patient to recall,as precisely as possible the evaluation E1. At first the reminder will be free,the data can be completed, if necessary, with an indication, a recognition.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age from 18 to 65 years
* Admitted to emergencies for IMV by benzodiazepines
* Supported at Toulouse University Hospital (hospitalization, outpatient)
Group control :
* Age from 18 to 65 years
* Admitted to emergencies for IMV by non-depressive substances of the central nervous system
* Supported at Toulouse University Hospital (hospitalization, outpatient)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient under guardianship
* Not speaking and / or not reading French
* Neurodegenerative disease diagnosed
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juliette SALLES, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Toulouse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-A01581-52
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RC31/17/0160
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.