Continue or Stop Applying Wet Cupping (Al-Hijamah) in Migraine

NCT ID: NCT03479060

Last Updated: 2018-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

109 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-03

Study Completion Date

2018-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the short and long-term effects of application of Wet Cupping Therapy (WCT) in the treatment of migraine headaches in adults.Half of the participants will continue WCT application and the other half will not.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In literature, Cupping therapy(CT) has been shown to be used mostly for pain control and the majority of RCT studies have shown that CT has potential benefits in pain conditions. Previous studies have reported the effect of pain mediator substance-P, endorphins, encephalins and dynorphins on pain(1) In addition to pain control, it is recommended for use as additional treatment in neurological diseases such as paralysis, Parkinson's disease and stroke Studies have shown successful results in the short term with the application of CT for migraine and tension-type headaches (2,3) Methodology Study design and Patient selection Patients with a history of migraine diagnosis who presented at the Research Polyclinic of Karabuk University Training and Research Hospital for wet-cupping therapy in the period May 2016-January 2018 were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they had a history of head and neck surgery, a diagnosis of sinusitis, a diagnosis of fibromyalgia and inflammatory disease (rheumatism, infection etc.), were pregnant, had a diagnosis of cancer, bleeding disorder and widespread skin disease, malignant hypertension or any other disease which could cause headache. The diagnosis of migraine was confirmed by an experienced neurologist and the migraine type was determined. The medical treatments of the patients were reviewed and MIDAS was applied to determine the baseline score. In addition to the medical treatment, WCT was applied once a month, 3 times (Day 0, 30, 60). At the end of the 3rd month patients were allocated into two parallel arms. They were randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group in a double blind manner by the sealed opaque envelope technique. Intervention group continued WCT whereas patients in the control group discontinued the treatment. MIDAS was applied again at the end of the 6th and 12th months to both of the groups. Disability values in the 6th and 12th months were evaluated with MIDAS between those who continued treatment (Group 1) and those who did not (Group 2). Approval for the study was granted by Turgut Ozal University Ethics Committee, with number 99950669/236, dated 30.06.2014.Study design, application procedures and any possible side effects were explained to the study participants and informed consents obtained. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

MIDAS The migraine disability score is a scale evaluating disability and loss associated with migraine. It consists of 7 questions, the 1st, 3rd and 5th of which evaluate the days lost from school, work, housework or leisure activities because of headaches in the last 3 months. The 2nd and 4th questions evaluate the number of additional days lost from work or housework in the last 3 months due to a reduction in productivity (defined as at least a 50% reduction in productivity). An additional two questions (MIDAS A and B) evaluate the frequency of headaches and the severity of the headaches using a visual analog scale (VAS), but these are not added to the total MIDAS score. The total MIDAS points are obtained from the total of the first 5 questions. Total points of 0-5 = 1st degree (very little or no restriction), 6-10 points =2nd degree (mild or occasional restriction), 11-20 points = 3rd degree (moderate level of restriction), and 21 + points = 4th degree (severe restriction).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine Disorders Migraine With Aura Migraine Without Aura

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continue WCT Application

From the 3rd month to the 12th month Wet cupping applied as an intervention MIDAS was applied at the end of the 6th and 12th months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Wet Cupping

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

cupping technique procedure was conducted in five phases:Primary suction,Area disinfection,Scarification,Bloodletting and secondary suction and Removing and dressing

Discontinue WCT Application

No intervention in this arm.Only MIDAS applied

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Wet Cupping

cupping technique procedure was conducted in five phases:Primary suction,Area disinfection,Scarification,Bloodletting and secondary suction and Removing and dressing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subject has migraine headache

Exclusion Criteria

History of head and neck surgery, Diagnosis of sinusitis Diagnosis of fibromyalgia and inflammatory disease (rheumatism, infection etc.) Diagnosis of cancer Diagnosis of bleeding disorder Malignant hypertension

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karabuk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

SULEYMAN ERSOY

Assist.Prof. Department of Family Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

SULEYMAN ERSOY

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karabuk University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karabuk University Karabuk Research and Education hospital

Karabük, Karabük Province, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sajid MI. Hijama therapy (wet cupping) - its potential use to complement British healthcare in practice, understanding, evidence and regulation. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016 May;23:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27157951 (View on PubMed)

Ahmadi A, Schwebel DC, Rezaei M. The efficacy of wet-cupping in the treatment of tension and migraine headache. Am J Chin Med. 2008;36(1):37-44. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X08005564.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18306448 (View on PubMed)

Benli AR, Oruc MA. What is the difference of effectiveness of wet cupping therapy in migraine types?. Biomedical Research, 2017, 28.20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KBU-BAP-14/1-KA-057.

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fever Tracking Study
NCT05475067 COMPLETED