Validity of Humidity Ramp Protocols for Identifying Limits of Survivability in Heat-exposed Persons

NCT ID: NCT05963529

Last Updated: 2023-11-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-14

Study Completion Date

2023-09-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The global populace is at growing risk of heat-related illness due to climate change and accompanying increases in the intensity and regularity of extremely hot temperatures. In heat-exposed persons, heat gain from the environment and metabolism initially exceeds the rate of heat dissipation from the skin. Heat is stored in the body, causing core and skin temperatures to rise, which in turn triggers autonomically mediated elevations in cutaneous blood flow and sweating to facilitate heat loss. If conditions are compensable, heat loss increases until it balances total heat gain. At this point, the rate of heat storage falls to zero (i.e., heat balance is achieved) and body temperature stabilizes, albeit at a level elevated from thermoneutral conditions. If, however, the maximal achievable rate of heat dissipation is insufficient to offset heat gain, conditions are uncompensable, and prolonged exposure will cause a continual rise in core temperature that can compromise health if left unchecked. The environmental limits of compensability (i.e., the temperatures/humidities above which heat balance can not be maintained) are therefore an important determinant of survival during prolonged heat exposure. Evaluating this limit and how it can be modified (e.g., by behavior or individual factors like age or sex) is an increasingly important and active field of study.

Contemporary evaluations of the environmental limits of compensability utilize "ramping protocols" in which participants are exposed to increasing levels of temperature or humidity (in 5-10 min stages) while core temperature is monitored. It is generally observed that core temperature is relatively stable (or rises slightly) in the early stages of exposure but undergoes an abrupt and rapid increase as heat stress becomes more severe. The conditions (e.g., wet-bulb temperature or wet-bulb globe temperature) at this "inflection point" are taken as the limits of compensability. That is, it is assumed that inflection corresponds to the demarcation point, below which core temperature would remain stable for prolonged periods (theoretically indefinitely if hydration is maintained) but above which heat loss is insufficient to offset heat gain, causing core temperature to rise continuously. Despite the increasing use of these protocols, no study has clearly demonstrated their validity for identifying the environmental limits of compensability. The goal of this project is therefore to assess the validity of ramping protocols for determining the ambient conditions above which thermal compensation is not possible.

Enrolled participants will complete four experimental trials in a climate-controlled chamber: one ramping protocol followed by three randomized fixed-condition exposures. In the ramping protocol, participants will rest in 42°C with 28% relative humidity (RH) for 70 min, after which RH will be increased 3% every 10 min until 70% RH is achieved. The core (esophageal) temperature inflection point will be determined. For the fixed-condition exposures, participants will rest in i) 42°C with RH \~5% below their individual inflection point (below-inflection condition), ii) 42°C with RH \~5% above their individual inflection point (above-inflection condition), and iii) 26°C with 45% RH (control condition). Comparing the rate of change in esophageal temperature between each fixed-condition exposure will provide important insight into the validity of ramping protocols for identifying the limits of compensability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heat Stress Heat Exposure Temperature Change, Body Temperature; Extreme, Exposure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Heat wave Hot weather Heat strain Cardiovascular strain Environmental limits for compensability Extreme heat events Heat survivability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Each participant will complete four trial conditions including one humidity-ramp protocol and three fixed-condition exposures. The humidity ramp protocol will always be completed first. Ambient temperature will remain constant at 42°C. After a 1-hour equilibrium period, relative humidity will be increased by 3% in 10-min increments, from 28% to 70%. The inflection point for core (esophageal) temperature will be subsequently determined.

On three separate days following the humidity ramp protocol, participants will complete three fixed-condition exposures in random order: 1) 42°C with relative humidity \>5% below the estimate compensability limit (below-threshold condition); 2) 42°C with relative humidity \>5% above the estimated compensability limit (above-threshold condition) and 3) 28°C with 35% relative humidity (control condition). Exposure will be terminated early if core temperature exceeds 39.2°C or if the participant requests to withdraw.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants will be informed of the study interventions before providing informed consent but will be masked to the order the fixed-condition exposures (i.e., participants will not know whether the humidity is above or below their identified inflection point). Data processing and statistical analysis for the fixed-condition exposures will be performed with the analyst blinded to participant and trial conditions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Humidity-ramp protocol

Healthy male and female volunteers. Participants will complete all exposures. The humidity-ramp protocol will necessarily be performed first. The order of the fixed-condition exposures will be randomized.

Group Type OTHER

Humidity-ramp protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants are exposed to 42°C and 28% relative humidity for 70 minutes. Thereafter, humidity is increased 3% until an ambient humidity of 70% is achieved. The humidity at which esophageal temperature (and rectal temperature and heart rate) inflect is subsequently determined.

Above-inflection fixed-condition exposure

Healthy male and female volunteers. Participants will complete all exposures. The humidity-ramp protocol will necessarily be performed first. The order of the fixed-condition exposures will be randomized.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Above-inflection fixed-condition exposure

Intervention Type OTHER

After a 1 hour equilibrium at 42°C and 28% relative humidity, humidity will be increased 3% every 10 min until it is \~5% higher than the participants' individual esophageal temperature inflection point identified in the humidity ramp protocol. These conditions will be held constant for the remainder of the 9-hour exposure period (starting from the beginning of equilibrium). Tap water will be provided at regular intervals to limit dehydration.

Below-inflection fixed-condition exposure

Healthy male and female volunteers. Participants will complete all exposures. The humidity-ramp protocol will necessarily be performed first. The order of the fixed-condition exposures will be randomized.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Below-inflection fixed-condition exposure

Intervention Type OTHER

After a 1 hour equilibrium at 42°C and 28% relative humidity, humidity will be increased 3% every 10 min until it is \~5% lower than the participants' individual esophageal temperature inflection point identified in the humidity ramp protocol. These conditions will be held constant for the remainder of the 9-hour exposure period (starting from the beginning of equilibrium). Tap water will be provided at regular intervals to limit dehydration.

Control fixed-condition exposure

Healthy male and female volunteers. Participants will complete all exposures. The humidity-ramp protocol will necessarily be performed first. The order of the fixed-condition exposures will be randomized.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control fixed-condition exposure

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants are exposed for 9-hours to 28°C with 35% relative humidity. Participant will be allowed to drink tap water ad libitum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Humidity-ramp protocol

Participants are exposed to 42°C and 28% relative humidity for 70 minutes. Thereafter, humidity is increased 3% until an ambient humidity of 70% is achieved. The humidity at which esophageal temperature (and rectal temperature and heart rate) inflect is subsequently determined.

Intervention Type OTHER

Above-inflection fixed-condition exposure

After a 1 hour equilibrium at 42°C and 28% relative humidity, humidity will be increased 3% every 10 min until it is \~5% higher than the participants' individual esophageal temperature inflection point identified in the humidity ramp protocol. These conditions will be held constant for the remainder of the 9-hour exposure period (starting from the beginning of equilibrium). Tap water will be provided at regular intervals to limit dehydration.

Intervention Type OTHER

Below-inflection fixed-condition exposure

After a 1 hour equilibrium at 42°C and 28% relative humidity, humidity will be increased 3% every 10 min until it is \~5% lower than the participants' individual esophageal temperature inflection point identified in the humidity ramp protocol. These conditions will be held constant for the remainder of the 9-hour exposure period (starting from the beginning of equilibrium). Tap water will be provided at regular intervals to limit dehydration.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control fixed-condition exposure

Participants are exposed for 9-hours to 28°C with 35% relative humidity. Participant will be allowed to drink tap water ad libitum.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female adults.
* Aged 18-85 years.
* Non-smoking.
* English or French speaking.
* Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Physical restriction (e.g., due to disease: intermittent claudication, renal impairment, active proliferative retinopathy, unstable cardiac or pulmonary disease, disabling stroke, severe arthritis, etc.).
* Use of or changes in medication judged by the patient or investigators to make participation in this study inadvisable (e.g., medications increasing risk of heat-related illness; beta blockers, anticholinergics, etc.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Glen P. Kenny

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert D Meade, PhD, MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Ottawa

Glen P Kenny, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Ottawa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Ottawa

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

uORamp

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id