LATITUDE An Observational Study of Patient Choice and the Urethral Bulking Agent, Bulkamid®
NCT ID: NCT03474653
Last Updated: 2023-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
399 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-12
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As a second part of the study, we are asking all patients having any first line treatment for stress incontinence to complete a short questionnaire telling us how they decided what treatment to have. A small number of these women will be contacted via telephone and asked whether they would mind being interviewed to tell us more about this.
We will also interview a number of doctors taking part in Latitude to find out how they counsel patients about different treatment options for stress urinary incontinence.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness and Safety of Bulkamid® as Bulking Agent for the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence
NCT00333073
Bulking Agents for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Females
NCT00629083
Peri-urethral Bulk Agent Injection of Bulkamid®
NCT05741580
Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Midurethral Sling for Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04775186
TVT Versus Bulkamid®-Injections in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT02538991
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Bulkamid® is a non-toxic hydrogel that is injected under the lining of the urethra. It increases the urethral 'bulk', hence increasing resistance against leakage of urine. It is being increasingly offered as a primary treatment for SUI due to the reduced associated risks, ability to administer in the outpatient setting and recent controversy surrounding polypropylene mesh. However, there is currently limited data on how effective it is as a first line treatment, both in the short and long term, and what effect it may have on secondary continence procedures.
This study aims to collect data from 220 women who choose Bulkamid® as their primary treatment over a total of 60 months to review its effectiveness. Telephone consultations will take place at regular intervals using validated questionnaires to assess SUI symptoms.
It is not known how easy women find it to choose between the surgical treatment options for SUI, what factors they weigh up or what information would help them make this decision. The embedded qualitative study of patient choice will use a combination of questionnaire and 2 in-depth semi structured interviews to investigate this further. Consultant Urogynaecologists will also be interviewed to compare factors they think are important to their patients' treatment decision with what is expressed by women with SUI. The overall aim is to develop a prototype decision aid to better support women when making this treatment decision.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Latitude 1 (Bulking)
Women with first line stress incontinence who choose to have Bulkamid as a treatment
No interventions assigned to this group
Latitude 2 (Choice)
Women with first line stress incontinence who choose to have any treatment including Bulking.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Evidence of previous supervised pelvic floor muscle training
Exclusion Criteria
* Any previous surgery for urinary incontinence
* Concomitant prolapse surgery
* Detrusor over activity on urodynamics
* Residual urine \> 100ml at urodynamics
* Bladder capacity \< 300 ml
* An acute urinary tract infection (UTI)
* An allergic reaction to the local anaesthesia used in the treating unit
* An allergic reaction to all the antibiotics which could be used for prophylaxis
* Current treatment with systemic corticosteroids
* Pregnancy
* Active autoimmune or connective tissue diseases
* Not fluent in English requiring an independent interpreter
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Contura
INDUSTRY
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fiona M Reid
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
V1 15/12/16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.