Test and Evaluation of Non-Invasive Neuro-Assessment Devices (NINAD: Neurokinetics, Inc, iPAS
NCT ID: NCT03465995
Last Updated: 2020-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-22
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The research design is test/re-test, with three assessments obtained on three separate visits. This will allow the assessment of reliability of both the device and the measure(s) that are computed from the input signals. Participants will be Healthy Controls (HC) as defined in the inclusion exclusion section.
In this initial study, investigators will be administering standardized self-report instruments (Standard Form 36 - SF36, and Symptom Checklist 90r, or SCL-90r), standard three-lead EKG. In addition they will administer the NKI i-PAS specific protocol as delineated by NKI.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Testing Devices That Involve the Sense of Touch in Subjects With Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT01404494
Neuromodulatory Treatments for Pain Management in TBI
NCT03418129
Pain Management Using Mobile Technology in Veterans With PTSD and TBI
NCT02237885
Web-Based Self-Monitoring Activity-Restriction and Relaxation Training Program for Kids With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT03498495
Applying Neuromodulation to Accelerate Training Effects
NCT03224559
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Additionally, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) also notes that TBI is significantly under-reported.
Traumatic brain injury is under detected. Neuropsychological evaluations are often nondisclosing The DoD has invested considerable funds in the development of devices for use in acute and chronic assessment of TBI. Unfortunately none of these devices have been tested systematically to establish reliability of the equipment, reliability of the signals obtained, or reliability of the measures derived from the signals obtained.
The NeuroKinetics i-PAS system is a mobile assessment device with an integrated display for eye tracking with the following properties: a head mounted display, a sampling rate of 100 frames per second, eye tracking in the horizontal, vertical and torsional axes, and pupil area measurement with a spatial resolution less than 0.1 o. The testing protocol includes: optokinetic tracking, smooth pursuit horizontal, smooth pursuit vertical, saccade random horizontal, saccade random vertical, saccade predictive horizontal, antisaccade (horizontal), self-paced saccade, saccade and reaction times, visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, gaze horizontal, light reflex, subjective visual (vertical) and subjective vertical horizontal. Several quantitative measures are computed from the data acquired in each test, and these measures are then employed in a multivariate diagnostic assessment.
It is important to distinguish between a device, a signal and a measure. As used here, the term device refers to a hardware technology used to obtain a signal. In the case of neurodiagnostic devices, the signal is usually a measurement of voltage as a function of time. Examples of signals pertinent to the present discussion include the electrocardiogram (providing an assessment of autonomic nervous system status), the electroencephalogram, evoked potentials, event related potentials, balance records and eye movement trajectories. A clear distinction must be drawn between a signal, typically a voltage record, and a measure which is a number that is computed from the voltage signal. Reliability and validity must be investigated separately for each measure For example, a dozen measures may be calculated from the same EEG voltage signal. The reliability and validity of each measure must be evaluated.
The objectives of this initial study are limited. The investigators address the question: are the measures obtained from the NeuroKinetics iPAS eye tracking system longitudinally stable in a clinically stable healthy participant? These measures are described in a subsequent section.
A single channel ECG will be acquired and measures of heart rate variability will be calculated from this signal. Measures of heart rate variability provide an indirect surrogate measure of complex multifactorial states that can have an impact on psychophysiological variables. Alterations of heart rate variability (HRV) are associated with pain, attention and cognitive function and fatigue, all of which can affect neurophysiological measures. High intra-individual variability in a test-retest study is a warning sign that between recording changes in the state of the participant rather than reliability failures in the eye tracking measure may be playing a role in low reliability.
Following consent, eligibility will be established based on head injury history, the score on the Symptom Checklist 90 (in the Supporting Documents file), the Short Form 36 (in the Supporting Documents file), and the Defense Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) Three Question Screening Tool.
The standard iPAS eye tracking evaluation as described below will be administered and the ECG will be recorded simultaneously during this process.
A second recording will be obtained within two to six days of the first recording.
A third recording will be obtained at approximately four weeks following the first recording.
This study will establish normal values of neuroassessment measures obtained from healthy controls and will be used to establish the statistical separation between healthy populations and clinical populations presenting neuropsychiatric disorders including TBI-positive patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NKI iPAS Diagnostic Protocol
Research participants who qualify for this study will put on EKG leads, and then a non-invasive device called iPAS, which will record heart rate and eye tracking data while participants perform a task on the screen of the device. The testing session will not exceed 30 minutes. Participants will take a total of 3 recordings over a period of roughly 5 weeks.
NKI i-PAS Diagnostic Protocol
The NKI i-PAS:
The NeuroKinetics i-PAS system is a mobile assessment device with an integrated display for eye tracking with the following properties: a head mounted display, a sampling rate of 100 frames per second, eye tracking in the horizontal, vertical and torsional axes, and pupil area measurement with a spatial resolution less than 0.1 o. The testing protocol includes: optokinetic tracking, smooth pursuit horizontal, smooth pursuit vertical, saccade random horizontal, saccade random vertical, saccade predictive horizontal, antisaccade (horizontal), self-paced saccade, saccade and reaction times, visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, gaze horizontal, light reflex, subjective visual (vertical) and subjective vertical horizontal. Several quantitative measures are computed from the data acquired in each test, and these measures are then employed in a multivariate diagnostic assessment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NKI i-PAS Diagnostic Protocol
The NKI i-PAS:
The NeuroKinetics i-PAS system is a mobile assessment device with an integrated display for eye tracking with the following properties: a head mounted display, a sampling rate of 100 frames per second, eye tracking in the horizontal, vertical and torsional axes, and pupil area measurement with a spatial resolution less than 0.1 o. The testing protocol includes: optokinetic tracking, smooth pursuit horizontal, smooth pursuit vertical, saccade random horizontal, saccade random vertical, saccade predictive horizontal, antisaccade (horizontal), self-paced saccade, saccade and reaction times, visual reaction time, auditory reaction time, gaze horizontal, light reflex, subjective visual (vertical) and subjective vertical horizontal. Several quantitative measures are computed from the data acquired in each test, and these measures are then employed in a multivariate diagnostic assessment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Between 18 and 55 years old
* In good general health. Good general health is operationalized for the purpose of this study by scores within one standard deviation of the mean in all eight sections of the short form 36.
* A normalized Global Severity Scale of less than or equal to 65 on the Symptom Checklist 90-R and subscale scores less than the cut scores indicating significant pathology.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any history of seizures or Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors
* A normalized Global Severity Scale of more than 65 on the Symptom Checklist 90-R or any subscale score indicating significant pathology.
* Scores greater than one standard deviation from the mean on all eight sections of the Short Form 36.
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Citadel, The Military College of North Carolina
UNKNOWN
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Citadel
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEM 91-2714
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.