Efficacy and Safety of GSP 301 Nasal Spray in Children (Aged 6 to Under 12 Years) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

NCT ID: NCT03463031

Last Updated: 2019-10-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

446 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-16

Study Completion Date

2018-11-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GSP 301 NS

Fixed dose combination of olopatadine hydrochloride 665 μg and mometasone furoate 25 μg NS

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GSP 301 NS

Intervention Type DRUG

1 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

GSP 301 Placebo NS

GSP 301 Placebo nasal spray

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

GSP 301 Placebo NS

Intervention Type DRUG

1 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GSP 301 NS

1 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

Intervention Type DRUG

GSP 301 Placebo NS

1 spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male and female subjects aged ≥6 to \<12 years
2. Clinical history of SAR (at least 2 years) with exacerbations during the study season for the relevant seasonal allergen (e.g., tree/grass pollen)
3. Demonstrated sensitivity to at least 1 seasonal allergen through positive skin prick test within 12 months prior to screening
4. A 12-hour rTNSS value ≥6 out of a possible 12 for the morning assessment at screening
5. Signed informed consent/assent form (subject and parent/caregiver/legal guardian)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Females of childbearing potential or pregnant
2. Plans to travel outside the known pollen area for the investigational site for 24 hours or longer during the last 7 days of the run-in period.
3. History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing
4. History and evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent post nasal drip
5. Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection.
6. Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

11 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Glenmark Specialty S.A.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sudeesh Tantry, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Glenmark Investigational Site 18

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 32

Ontario, California, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 30

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 17

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 21

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 13

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 26

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 28

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 14

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 19

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 25

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 12

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 10

Rolla, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 27

Warrensburg, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 15

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 3

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 8

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 11

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 29

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 2

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 33

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 4

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 6

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 5

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 24

Kerrville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 1

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 7

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 9

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 20

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 31

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 22

Draper, Utah, United States

Site Status

Glenmark Investigational Site 23

Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Prenner BM, Amar NJ, Hampel FC Jr, Caracta CF, Wu W. Efficacy and safety of GSP301 nasal spray in children aged 6 to 11 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Nov;129(5):618-626.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.07.029. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35926824 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GSP 301-305

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study Of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00358475 COMPLETED PHASE3