Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray (NS) in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR)
NCT ID: NCT02709538
Last Updated: 2020-02-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
601 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-30
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray (NS) in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)
NCT02631551
To Study GSP 301 in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
NCT02318303
Efficacy and Safety of GSP 301 Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)
NCT02870205
Efficacy and Safety of GSP 301 Nasal Spray in Children (Aged 6 to Under 12 Years) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)
NCT03463031
Once-Daily Investigational Nasal Spray In Adults And Adolescents With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR)
NCT00289198
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GSP 301 NS
GSP 301 NS
FDC of olopatadine HCl and mometasone furoate: 2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7
2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0
2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GSP 301 NS
FDC of olopatadine HCl and mometasone furoate: 2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 3.7
2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks
GSP 301 Placebo NS pH 7.0
2 spray in each nostril twice daily for 52 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Documented clinical history of PAR (for at least 2 years preceding the Screening Visit \[Visit 1\]) and exhibiting a documented positive skin prick test (wheal diameter at least 3 mm greater than negative diluent control wheal) to at least 1 allergen known to induce PAR. Documentation of a positive result within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1) is acceptable.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing.
3. History of positive test for HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection.
4. Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent postnasal drip.
5. Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection.
6. Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Glenmark Specialty S.A.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sudeesh Tantry
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Investigational Site 2
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Investigational Site 28
Encinitas, California, United States
Investigational Site 27
San Diego, California, United States
Investigational Site 29
San Diego, California, United States
Investigational Site 32
Denver, Colorado, United States
Investigational Site 26
Aventura, Florida, United States
Investigational Site 9
Miami, Florida, United States
Investigational Site 33
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Investigational Site 11
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
Investigational Site 4
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Investigational Site 5
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Investigational Site 15
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Investigational Site 30
Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
Investigational Site 19
Skillman, New Jersey, United States
Investigational Site 18
Corning, New York, United States
Investigational Site 7
High Point, North Carolina, United States
Investigational Site 21
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Investigational Site 16
Sylvania, Ohio, United States
Investigational Site 22
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Investigational Site 13
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Investigational Site 23
Austin, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 24
Austin, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 3
Austin, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 31
Dallas, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 34
El Paso, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 6
Kerrville, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 14
New Braunfels, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 10
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 12
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 17
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 1
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 20
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 25
Waco, Texas, United States
Investigational Site 8
Waco, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Segall N, Prenner B, Lumry W, Caracta CF, Tantry SK. Long-term safety and efficacy of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Sep 1;40(5):301-310. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4233. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GPL/CT/2014/018/III
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.