A Retrospective Comparison of Neonatal Acid-base Status After CD Before January, 2015 and After January, 2016

NCT ID: NCT03455660

Last Updated: 2018-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective is to retrospectively gather peri-operative data on neonatal outcomes, primarily neonatal acid-base status, based on umbilical cord gas analysis, for the 23 months preceding and 23 months following the conduct of the "tilt versus supine study". The investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in mean neonatal umbilical artery base excess in neonates delivered by cesarean section during the period before and after conduct of the study, for elective, urgent and emergent deliveries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For decades, obstetric anesthesia dogma for term women undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) includes maintenance of left lateral tilt for uterine displacement until delivery, based on the premise that the supine position will result in aortocaval compression (ACC), maternal hypotension and fetal compromise. More recent evidence suggests that even in 15 degrees of left tilt, there is minimal relief of aortocaval compression. Furthermore, there is evidence that most practitioners never achieve 15 degrees of tilt anyway.

Between January 2015 and January 2016, the investigators conducted a randomized clinical trial at NewYork Presbyterian/The Allen Hospital in which healthy women undergoing elective CD were randomized (non-blinded) to supine horizontal (SUPINE, N=50) or 15° left tilt of the surgical table (TILT, N= 50) following spinal anesthesia (hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg, fentanyl 15 μg, preservative-free morphine 150 μg). Lactated Ringer's 10ml/kg and a phenylephrine (PE) infusion titrated to 100% baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) were initiated with intrathecal injection. The primary outcome was umbilical artery base excess (UA-BE). There were no differences in UA-BE or pH between groups. The mean UA-BE (± SD) was -0.5 mmol/L (± 1.6) in the SUPINE group (n=50) versus -0.6 mmol/L (± 1.5) in the TILT group (n=47) (p= 0.64). The conclusion was that maternal supine position during elective CD with spinal anesthesia in healthy term women does not impair neonatal acid-base status compared to 15° left tilt, when maternal SBP is maintained with a coload and PE infusion. The investigators understood that the findings may not be generalized to emergency situations or non-reassuring fetal status.

Since the end of the study, discussion of the findings with colleagues at Departmental grand rounds and national conferences, and a publication in the journal Anesthesiology, practitioners have reported feeling more comfortable with maternal supine position during cesarean delivery, as long as maternal SBP is kept at or near to baseline with crystalloid infusion and a PE infusion. It is routine practice at CUMC to use a prophylactic PE infusion for maintenance of maternal SBP close to or at baseline. It is also routine at CUMC to send samples of umbilical arterial and venous blood for analysis. Much of the dosing for neuraxial anesthesia (spinal, combined spinal epidural anesthesia and epidural doses) are standardized at CUMC. The investigators believe that since there has been a noticeable practice shift with practitioners anecdotally reporting that they have discontinued the routine use of left maternal tilt intraoperatively, the investigators will be able to collect useful data on cases which had not been studied - these include cases with preeclampsia, morbid obesity and emergencies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Delivery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pre-January 2015

Patients who underwent cesarean delivery between February 2013 and December 2014.

no intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

no intervention

Post-January 2016

Patients who underwent cesarean delivery between February 2016 and December 2017.

no intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

no intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

no intervention

no intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women who delivered between February 2013 and December 2014, and between February 2016 and December 2017

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Allison Lee

Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allison Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NewYork Presbyterian/The Allen Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lee AJ, Landau R. Aortocaval Compression Syndrome: Time to Revisit Certain Dogmas. Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1975-1985. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002313.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28759487 (View on PubMed)

Higuchi H, Takagi S, Zhang K, Furui I, Ozaki M. Effect of lateral tilt angle on the volume of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava in pregnant and nonpregnant women determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2015 Feb;122(2):286-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000553.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25603203 (View on PubMed)

Jones SJ, Kinsella SM, Donald FA. Comparison of measured and estimated angles of table tilt at Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Jan;90(1):86-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12488385 (View on PubMed)

Aust H, Koehler S, Kuehnert M, Wiesmann T. Guideline-recommended 15 degrees left lateral table tilt during cesarean section in regional anesthesia-practical aspects: An observational study. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Aug;32:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.041. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27290944 (View on PubMed)

Lee AJ, Landau R, Mattingly JL, Meenan MM, Corradini B, Wang S, Goodman SR, Smiley RM. Left Lateral Table Tilt for Elective Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia Has No Effect on Neonatal Acid-Base Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):241-249. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001737.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28598894 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAR7164

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Delayed Cord Clamping in VLBW Infants
NCT01222364 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2