Non-contrast MR Imaging for Whole Body Cancer Detection and Characterization
NCT ID: NCT03440554
Last Updated: 2021-04-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-24
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients who have additional standard-of-care scans within 12 months after their research scan may be asked to have a second non-contrast MRI for research within 90 days of their follow-up standard of care imaging. The whole body MRI scan will be compared to the standard-of-care scan for prostate cancer detection and to assess patient response to standard-of-care treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Prostate
NCT02245282
Prostate Assessment with Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) MRI
NCT04992728
Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Locate and Characterize Prostate Cancer
NCT00082147
MRI in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer
NCT01292291
Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Staging Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT02237612
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients receiving additional standard-of-care imaging within 12 months after the research MRI may be asked to return for an additional whole body MRI scan within 90 days of their standard-of-care scan. The additional research scan will be requested of patients that have evidence of progression during ongoing standard of care treatment and monitoring. The additional scan would be requested of those patients to compare baseline scans to those that are completed during standard of care imaging. This would be an additional tool to verify disease progression or treatment response.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Whole Body Non-Contrast MRI
Whole Body Non-Contrast MRI
Whole Body Non-Contrast MRI in Prostate Cancer Patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Whole Body Non-Contrast MRI
Whole Body Non-Contrast MRI in Prostate Cancer Patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years.
* ECOG performance status 0-3.
* Capacity to give informed consent.
* Ability to lay supine for 30-60 minutes
* Ability to hear adequately without hearing aids.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients may be excluded if their weight exceeds 350 lbs, the limit for the safe operation of the MRI scanning table.
* A patient who is pregnant or trying to become pregnant will be excluded.
* Patients with any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may deem them ineligible for study participation.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prostate Cancer Foundation
OTHER
United States Department of Defense
FED
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Hahn
Assistant Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael E Hahn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marusyk A, Almendro V, Polyak K. Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Apr 19;12(5):323-34. doi: 10.1038/nrc3261.
Jacobs EL, Haskell CM. Clinical use of tumor markers in oncology. Curr Probl Cancer. 1991 Nov-Dec;15(6):299-360. doi: 10.1016/0147-0272(91)90005-u.
Drukteinis JS, Mooney BP, Flowers CI, Gatenby RA. Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening. Am J Med. 2013 Jun;126(6):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.025. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
Fischer AH. The diagnostic pathology of the nuclear envelope in human cancers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;773:49-75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8032-8_3.
White NS, McDonald C, Farid N, Kuperman J, Karow D, Schenker-Ahmed NM, Bartsch H, Rakow-Penner R, Holland D, Shabaik A, Bjornerud A, Hope T, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Liss M, Parsons JK, Chen CC, Raman S, Margolis D, Reiter RE, Marks L, Kesari S, Mundt AJ, Kane CJ, Carter BS, Bradley WG, Dale AM. Diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer: physical foundations and applications of restriction spectrum imaging. Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 1;74(17):4638-52. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3534.
Attariwala R, Picker W. Whole body MRI: improved lesion detection and characterization with diffusion weighted techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Aug;38(2):253-68. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24285.
White NS, Dale AM. Distinct effects of nuclear volume fraction and cell diameter on high b-value diffusion MRI contrast in tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Nov;72(5):1435-43. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25039. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
White NS, Leergaard TB, D'Arceuil H, Bjaalie JG, Dale AM. Probing tissue microstructure with restriction spectrum imaging: Histological and theoretical validation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Feb;34(2):327-46. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21454. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
Rakow-Penner RA, White NS, Parsons JK, Choi HW, Liss MA, Kuperman JM, Schenker-Ahmed N, Bartsch H, Mattrey RF, Bradley WG, Shabaik A, Huang J, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Marks L, Kane CJ, Reiter RE, Karow DS, Dale AM. Novel technique for characterizing prostate cancer utilizing MRI restriction spectrum imaging: proof of principle and initial clinical experience with extraprostatic extension. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Mar;18(1):81-5. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2014.50. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
White NS, McDonald CR, Farid N, Kuperman JM, Kesari S, Dale AM. Improved conspicuity and delineation of high-grade primary and metastatic brain tumors using "restriction spectrum imaging": quantitative comparison with high B-value DWI and ADC. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 May;34(5):958-64, S1. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3327. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Liss MA, White NS, Parsons JK, Schenker-Ahmed NM, Rakow-Penner R, Kuperman JM, Bartsch H, Choi HW, Mattrey RF, Bradley WG, Shabaik A, Huang J, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Marks LS, Kane CJ, Reiter RE, Dale AM, Karow DS. MRI-Derived Restriction Spectrum Imaging Cellularity Index is Associated with High Grade Prostate Cancer on Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Front Oncol. 2015 Feb 17;5:30. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00030. eCollection 2015.
McCammack KC, Kane CJ, Parsons JK, White NS, Schenker-Ahmed NM, Kuperman JM, Bartsch H, Desikan RS, Rakow-Penner RA, Adams D, Liss MA, Mattrey RF, Bradley WG, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Shabaik A, Dale AM, Karow DS. In vivo prostate cancer detection and grading using restriction spectrum imaging-MRI. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Jun;19(2):168-73. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.61. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
Conlin CC, Feng CH, Digma LA, Rodriguez-Soto AE, Kuperman JM, Rakow-Penner R, Karow DS, White NS, Seibert TM, Hahn ME, Dale AM. A Multicompartmental Diffusion Model for Improved Assessment of Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted Imaging Data and Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Jan;5(1):e210115. doi: 10.1148/rycan.210115.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
151686
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.