Sickness Evaluation at Altitude With Acetazolamide at Relative Dosages

NCT ID: NCT03424226

Last Updated: 2018-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-04

Study Completion Date

2018-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This double blind randomized trial will compare acetazolamide taken the morning of ascent to acetazolamide taken the evening prior to ascent for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS). The day of ascent dosing has not been studied as a powered primary outcome. The study population is hikers who are ascending at their own rate under their own power in a true hiking environment at the White Mountain Research Station, Owen Valley Lab (OVL) and Bancroft Station (BAR), Bancroft Peak, White Mountain, California

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The specific aim of this study is to determine whether acetazolamide started the day-of ascent is inferior to the standard night before ascent dose of acetazolamide for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS) in travelers in travelers to high altitude. Acetazolamide has been examined in over 200 high altitude studies over the past 50 years, and is the most commonly used drug for AMS prevention in the high mountains of Nepal, Western Europe, and Africa. Current Wilderness Medical Society Practice Guidelines recommend a 125mg dose of acetazolamide daily started the day or evening prior to ascent. However, day of ascent dosage has recently been found to be effective prophylaxis for severe AMS compared to placebo, but efficacy of day-of ascent dosage has not be confirmed versus standard acetazolamide dosage.

While acetazolamide is commonly used as an acclimatization aid, it is traditionally started the day or evening prior to ascent to theoretically optimize diuretic effect and compensatory respiratory changes. This timing may be impractical when rapid ascent is necessary, such as in search and rescue and military operations, or for the general recreationalists, trekkers, or climbers who do not have time to start prophylaxis prior to heading into the mountains. As there are an estimated 100 million recreationalists annually who ascend to high altitude around the world, innovation on optimal timing has a potentially large impact on traveler safety.

Acetazolamide has a time of onset between 60 - 90 minutes when taken as an immediate release tablet, with peak effect between 2 - 4 hours. With these pharmacokinetics in mind, we recently found that there was an observed robust protective effect of acetazolamide on severe AMS when taken the morning of ascent, and this was the first study to examine day-of dosing. This novel finding has not been otherwise investigated, and confirmation of this unique observation has the potential to increase acetazolamide'sits usage in "high risk" populations maximizing safety, while minimizing discomfort and poor sleep from pre-ascent nocturia., such as trekkers, skiers, climbers, and tactical missions requiring rapid ascents in the mountains of North America and Europe.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Mountain Sickness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double blind randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Visually identical pills

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

day of acetazolamide

acetazolamide 125mg twice a day, started morning of ascent

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acetazolamide

Intervention Type DRUG

a diuretic and commonly used medication for prevention and treatment of acute mountain sickness

night before acetazolamide

acetazolamide 125mg twice a day, started evening before ascent

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetazolamide

Intervention Type DRUG

a diuretic and commonly used medication for prevention and treatment of acute mountain sickness

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetazolamide

a diuretic and commonly used medication for prevention and treatment of acute mountain sickness

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

diamox

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-75 healthy non-pregnant volunteer
* live at low elevation \< 4000 ft
* Arrange your own transportation to WMRS (Bishop) by Friday evening of study weekend
* Available for full study duration (Friday PM-Sunday AM)

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 or \>75, Pregnant, Live at altitude \>4000 ft Slept at altitude \> 4000ft within 1 week of study Allergic to acetazolamide, sulfa drugs, Taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Acetazolamide, or Corticosteroids 1 week prior to study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Grant S Lipman

Associate Professor Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

44765

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study of TAK-105 in Healthy Adults
NCT04964258 COMPLETED PHASE1
Topical Capsaicin for Cyclical Vomiting
NCT03223350 COMPLETED PHASE2