Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) Monitoring for Detection of Intraoperative Positional Neuropraxia

NCT ID: NCT03422107

Last Updated: 2018-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-20

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PNI (Peripheral Nerve Injury) occurs in 5-15% of patients in cardiac surgery. So far, the mechanism of injury has never been researched. In this study, we will compare minimally invasive cardiac surgery with conventional cardiac surgery using a novel portable SSEP device to pinpoint the mechanism and timing of PNI during cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

General objectives The general objective of this study is to identify the causative insults during various kinds of cardiac surgeries. To attain this objective, we have three specific aims. Firstly, surgical insults such as excessive or asymmetric sternal retraction have long been regarded as the main causes of PNI. Therefore, we will investigate this by comparing cardiac surgeries with sternotomy to the ones without sternotomy. Secondly, more and more cardiac surgeons utilize minimally invasive techniques these days. In the current study, we will investigate the incidence, mechanisms and patterns of PNI in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries by comparing conventional surgeries to minimally invasive surgeries. Thirdly, recent studies have suggested systematic insults such as ischemia, inflammation, and underlying neuropathy might play more prominent roles in the mechanism of PNI. In this study, we will analyze various factors such as intraoperative hemodynamics and baseline patient characteristics to pinpoint the most responsible factors.

Background The studies regarding mechanisms of PNI in cardiac surgeries have not been done over the past few decades. With respect to minimally invasive cardiac surgeries, no studies have been done to investigate the mechanism of PNI.

Regarding the device used in this study The conventional SSEP device is large in size, invasive, and requires expertise to interpret. These characteristics have prevented its use in the operating room. This new portable SSEP device is devoid of these properties.

Significance Identification of causative insults will help clinicians to recognize and possibly prevent PNI during cardiac surgeries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Nerve Injuries Thoracic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAVI

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

No interventions assigned to this group

cAVR

Conventional Valve Replacement

No interventions assigned to this group

rCABG

minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft

No interventions assigned to this group

cCABG

Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

●all adult (age\>18, \<95 years of age) cardiac surgical patients who are undergoing the four following procedures, open AVR, TAVI, conventional CABG, robotic CABG

Exclusion Criteria

* any patients with contraindication to SSEP monitoring, which include skin burns or trauma at SSEP electrode sites
* lack of written consent
* emergency surgery
* language barrier
* fluctuating neurological signs/symptoms
* regional anesthesia (spinal, epidural, nerve block)
* CABG with radial artery harvest, combined cardiac surgeries
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Western University, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Murkin, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Western University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Satoru Fujii, MD

Role: CONTACT

226-378-2471

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Satoru Fujii, MD

Role: primary

519-685-8500 ext. 13302

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R-16-286

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.