Concentrating on Antisepsis: 5% vs. 10% Povidone-Iodine Prior to Intravitreal Injection
NCT ID: NCT03420820
Last Updated: 2018-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-01
2018-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Povidone-Iodine for Nasal Decolonization
NCT05529173
In Vivo Efficacy Study of Patient Preoperative Preps
NCT02203591
A Cluster-randomized Cross-over Trial Evaluating the Comparative Effectiveness of Three Skin Antiseptic Interventions
NCT01216761
Vancomycin Powder and Dilute Povidone Iodine Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in High Risk Total Joint Arthroplasty
NCT04075526
In Vivo Preoperative Skin Preparation Efficacy Study Within a Defined Product Coverage Area
NCT03681990
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Single-center randomized prospective trial enrolling patients into three protocols: 5% P-I applied to ocular surface from bottle, 10% P-I swabstick applied to ocular surface, and 10% P-I swabstick applied to lids, lashes, and ocular surface. Pre-procedure cultures will be obtained from the ocular surface, and a second culture will be taken following antisepsis, injection, and irrigation. Standard microbiologic techniques will be used to collect, culture, identify, and quantify ocular surface bacteria counts. Kruskal Wallis test will be used to assess significant difference between median bacterial loads at baseline and post-cleaning, as well as median reduction from baseline. Chi-squared test will be used to assess significant difference between reduction in number of patients with specific bacteria. Following injection, a patient survey will be administered to compare patients' subjective symptoms of ocular surface irritation during the PI preparation phase of the procedure.
Conclusions: The investigators anticipate that no significant difference exists in decrease of median CFUs between the three protocols, and that lower concentration of P-I provides a more comfortable patient experience.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
5% Betadine, Ocular Surface only
Use of 5% P-I from bottle dropper to sterilize the ocular surface only, prior to injection. Intervention: bacterial culture swab.
Bacterial Culture Swab
Culture swabs will be obtained before application of PI and after injection.
10% Betadine, Ocular Surface only
Use of 10% P-I swabstick to sterilize the ocular surface only, prior to injection. Intervention: bacterial culture swab.
Bacterial Culture Swab
Culture swabs will be obtained before application of PI and after injection.
10% Betadine, Ocular Surface and Adnexa
Use of 10% P-I swabstick to sterilize the ocular surface and surrounding lids and eyelashes only, prior to injection. Intervention: bacterial culture swab.
Bacterial Culture Swab
Culture swabs will be obtained before application of PI and after injection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bacterial Culture Swab
Culture swabs will be obtained before application of PI and after injection.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Matthew Bolton
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Matthew Bolton
Ophthalmology Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Donald Mazzulla, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ochsner Health System
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1162018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.