PET Patterns, Biomarkers and Outcome in Burst SCS Treated FBSS Patients
NCT ID: NCT03419312
Last Updated: 2020-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-11
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation With Artisan Paddle Electrode
NCT00386724
Changes in Cerebral Blood Flow in Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation for Low Back and Leg Pain
NCT00418301
A Novel Approach in Spinal Cord Stimulation: a Combination of Burst and Tonic Waveforms.
NCT03201705
Efficacy of the Spinal Cord Stimulation System as Salvage Therapy
NCT00387244
A Prospective Trial for the Effectiveness of the Use of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Failed Knee Surgery
NCT01912924
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Tonic spinal cord stimulation for chronic primarily neuropathic pain har been used for over 50 years. Tonic stimulation in frequencies from 20 to 70 Hz produces analgesia and paresthesia in the targeted area.
Burst stimulation, a novel spinal cord stimulation pattern, is an intermittent high frequency parenthesis-free therapy. This stimulation pattern consist of 5 spikes with an inter-spike frequency of 500 Hz, delivered at 40 Hz.
Clinical effectiveness and noninferiority of Burst stimulation has been proved. A few studies suggest that Burst stimulation induce different activities in cerebral pathways, compared with tonic stimulation. Patient reported attention to pain assessed by the pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ) seems to differ between burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation. This trial is designed to investigate cerebral mechanisms of burst stimulation, using PET O15-water measured blood flow and tissue perfusion as a proxy for cerebral activity.
Key events in study implementation:
Study phase 1
* Study Inclusion and baseline visit.
* Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system.
Study phase 2:
* Study visit 1(study day 0): Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM) data, Randomization to study sequence, blood sampling, PET 0, programming of SCS-system.
* Study visit 2 (study day 14): Blood sampling, PET 1, collection of PROM-data, SCS system switched off for washout.
* Study visit 3 (study day 21): Collection of PROM-data, programming of SCS-system, blood sampling.
* Study visit 4 (study day 35): Blood sampling, PET 2, collection of PROM-data, programming of SCS-system.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
Sequence A: Active burst stimulation followed by sham stimulation. Sequence B: Sham stimulation followed by burst stimulation. Sham and burst stimulation are separated by 7 days washout.
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Sham stimulation is achieved by switching of the stimulation equipment in connection with programming prior to the start of the current stimulation period. The programming procedure is identical before burst and sham stimulation periods.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study sequence A
Proclaim™ Elite 5: Burst - Washout - Sham
1. 14 days of burst stimulation.
2. 7 days washout.
3. 14 days of sham stimulation.
Proclaim™ Elite 5: Burst - Washout - Sham
All implanted hardware manufactured by S:t Jude Medical/Abbot:
Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG): Proclaim™ Elite 5 IPG, model 3660. Electrode: Octrode percutaneous lead, 60 cm, model 3161. Anchor: Long lead anchor, model 1106.
Study sequence B
Proclaim™ Elite 5: Sham - Washout - Burst
1. 14 days of sham stimulation.
2. 7 days washout.
3. 14 days of burst stimulation.
Proclaim™ Elite 5: Sham - Washout - Burst
All implanted hardware manufactured by S:t Jude Medical/Abbot:
Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG): Proclaim™ Elite 5 IPG, model 3660. Electrode: Octrode percutaneous lead, 60 cm, model 3161. Anchor: Long lead anchor, model 1106.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proclaim™ Elite 5: Burst - Washout - Sham
All implanted hardware manufactured by S:t Jude Medical/Abbot:
Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG): Proclaim™ Elite 5 IPG, model 3660. Electrode: Octrode percutaneous lead, 60 cm, model 3161. Anchor: Long lead anchor, model 1106.
Proclaim™ Elite 5: Sham - Washout - Burst
All implanted hardware manufactured by S:t Jude Medical/Abbot:
Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG): Proclaim™ Elite 5 IPG, model 3660. Electrode: Octrode percutaneous lead, 60 cm, model 3161. Anchor: Long lead anchor, model 1106.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Prior lumbar surgery in medical history.
3. Diagnosed with neuropathic pain in the lower extremities and graded as probable neuropathic pain or definite neuropathic pain according International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) criteria.
4. Patient report largely unchanged pain condition last 6 months.
5. Patient has undergone a 7 day SCS trial with epidural burst stimulation with the following results:
1. At least 75% coverage of the painful area of tonic stimulation before start of burst trial stimulation.
2. At least 50% reduction in pain intensity, measured via BPI, item 5 from baseline of trial to end of trial period.
6. The patient is ≥ 18 years of age and \< 60 years of age.
7. The patient must willingly participate in all parts of the study, as well as having the ability to complete the entire study plan.
8. Patient must certify that he / she understands the study plan, as well as voluntarily sign informed consent to participate in the study.
9. Must be able to sit still for a minimum of 45 minutes and be able to follow restrictions related to the PET survey.
Exclusion Criteria
2. The patient is treated with opioids exceeding 80 milligrams of Morphine per day or is considered at risk for development of problematic opioid use.
3. The patient suffers from an untreated depression or anxiety.
4. The patient can not complete the study plan.
5. The patient is unable to read or write Swedish.
6. The patient is currently participates in another clinical trial.
7. A history of previous PET scan or other substantial radiation dose in the last 5 years.
8. The patients is suffering from claustrophobia.
9. Ongoing pregnancy or planned pregnancy during study time.
10. The patient has contraindications for arterial catheterization.
11. The patient is previously treated with spinal cord stimulation.
18 Years
59 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Linkoeping University
OTHER_GOV
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Dept. of Surgical Sciences and Dept. of Medicinal Chemistry, Div. of Molecular Imaging.
Uppsala, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 2017/110/1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.