Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
689 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-12-04
2020-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Pressure Algometry in the Clinical Assessment of Acute Abdominal Pain in Children
NCT04688463
The Predictive Value of Ureteral Jet Assessment With Ultrasound in Patients Presenting With Acute Renal Colic
NCT02577146
Role of Multidetector Computerized Tomography (MDCT) in Diagnosis of Non Traumatic Acute Abdomen in Pediatric Age Group.
NCT04480983
Imaging and Histopathological Examination for Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Score
NCT03171662
Feasability of Ambulatory Appendicectomy
NCT03186105
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
18,000 cases of emergency department presentations over 10 years were used as a training and validation dataset. To develop the appendicitis prediction model, deep learning neural networks with a customized medical ontology were used. The diagnostic accuracy of the model is expressed as sensitivity (recall), specificity and F1 score (harmonic mean). The developed diagnosis predictive model shows high sensitivity (86.3%), specificity (91.9%) and F1 score (88.8) in diagnosing appendicitis from patients presenting with abdominal pain.
The predictive model algorithm will also highlight words in the free text (entered by the attending physician) that it assigns higher probability for predicting an outcome. The doctors will be instructed to provide a percentage likelihood of appendicitis based on the clinical presentation and any available laboratory investigations. The doctor is then shown the prediction of the algorithm as well as the highlighted words for the patient entered. He/she must then provide another prediction of the likelihood of appendicitis after seeing the algorithm generated prediction.
The aim is to evaluate the performance of the algorithm and to assess if usage of the algorithm is able to help emergency doctors improve their diagnosis of appendicitis. The prediction results will be tabulated to assess accuracy of the algorithm, doctors before algorithm input and doctors after receiving algorithm input. The accuracy will be expressed as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prediction value, F1 score and F0.5 score.
Approximately 100 emergency doctors will be recruited over the course of 1 year as participants in the study. The doctors will be split randomly assigned to two groups - the algorithm arm and the no algorithm arm. The randomization will be by time (weekly) using variable block randomization of 4 and 6. The patients will be followed up for the final discharge diagnoses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
With algorithm use
Free text prediction algorithm for appendicitis
A free-text prediction software that predicts the probability of acute appendicitis
No algorithm use
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Free text prediction algorithm for appendicitis
A free-text prediction software that predicts the probability of acute appendicitis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of abdominal pain, OR
* Presence of gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting or diarrhea, OR
* Fever with anorexia
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal of consent
21 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National University Hospital, Singapore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kee Yuan Ngiam, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National University Hospital, Singapore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National University Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N-171-000-456-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.