Added Value of the Oculomotor and Cognitive Examination in the Management of Patients With ADHD

NCT ID: NCT03411434

Last Updated: 2018-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-17

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by symptoms of inattention and / or hyperactivity-impulsivity that affects nearly 6% of school-aged children and persists into adulthood. More and more studies are interested in biomarkers of this pathology. The oculomotricity, which allows to highlight deficits motor and attention present in ADHD, is used routinely in the expert centers. In general, the pharmacological treatment of ADHD is associated with a clinical response in approximately 70% of cases. Today, there is no review to predict the individual response to treatment.

Hypotheses The investigators hypothesize that a precise analysis of the oculomotor markers will allow to measure the improvement of the symptomatology of the ADHD disorder following the introduction of the psycho-stimulatory treatment. In other words, the investigators hypothesize that these markers could be a useful aid in patient follow-up by the clinician and allow early identification of responder and non-responder patients.

Primary objective The main objective of this study is to measure the added value of oculomotor examination in the follow-up of psycho-stimulant-treated ADHD patients.

Main Evaluation Criteria The primary endpoint is oculomotor performance. Parameters analyzed for each saccade are latency, amplitude, duration, average speed, direction.

Secondary Criteria Evaluation (s) Correlations will be established between oculomotor data and scores obtained at the clinical scales assessing ADHD symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity as well as cognitive performance. The data obtained before the introduction of the psycho-stimulant treatment (V0, baseline) will be compared with those obtained after acute administration of methylphenidate (10 mg orally,V1) and during the follow-up visit at 6 months (V2).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Type of study and experimental plan:

This is an interventional study designed to evaluate routine care. Number of Necessary Subjects Participants will be stratified by age to control the effect of age. The age groups to be analyzed are: 7-9 vs 10-12 vs. 13-18 versus 19-29 vs 30-40 and 41-50, each with at least 15 participants. total of 90 participants.

• Study population The patients included in this study are followed in the general psychiatric department of the Rouffach hospital center for attention deficit disorder with or without hyperactivity (ADHD). The study focuses on ADHD patients aged 7 to 50 years, undergoing an oculomotor and cognitive examination before the initiation of psychostimulant therapy with methylphenidate (MPH) (baseline, V0); two weeks later (V1) following a single low dose administration of MPH (10 mg orally given at 8 AM) ; and at 6-month follow-up (V2) when patients are medicated with adequate dose of MPH.

• Clinical assessments All subjects are evaluated directly by psychiatrists and neuropsychologists who are experts in the field of ADHD and are experienced in the use of standardized or semi-standardized clinical instruments. Clinical investigation allows extensive and standardized evaluation of patients.

1. Categorical standardized assessment of ADHD symptoms Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV-TR) ADHD Criteria: Subtype: Combined, Inattentive, Hyperactive-Impulsive.

• In children-adolescents: CONNERS Evaluation Scale for Teachers and Parents: Hetero-Questionnaire for Assessing Behavioral Disorders in ADHD.

ADHD Questionnaire: self-assessment questionnaire for children and adolescents with attention difficulties, agitation and behavioral problems allowing the quantification of ADHD symptoms.

ADHD Questionnaire: Hetero-evaluation questionnaire for children and adolescents with attention difficulties, agitation and behavioral problems allowing the quantification of ADHD symptoms. This questionnaire is completed by one of the parents.

• In adults: Adult Self Reporting Scale (ASRS 1.1): self-assessment grid to assess current adult ADHD disorders.

Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in adults (DIVA 2.0): semi-structured interview corresponding to the DSM-IV criteria, according to which the diagnosis of ADHD in adults requires the demonstration of symptoms of ADHD both in childhood and at age adult. This scale is composed of 3 parts that apply each to childhood and adulthood: inattention criteria, hyperactivity-impulsivity criteria, age of onset and impaired functioning due to symptoms.

Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS-25): a self-report scale that allows retrospective assessment of the presence of ADHD registry disorders in childhood.

World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): Self-Assessment Scale, to measure pathology-induced disability in daily living during the last 30 days.
2. Standardized neurocognitive assessment

* Intellectual level The intellectual level of the patients is assessed using the Wechsler scales: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WIPPSI) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) according to the age of the subject. The variety of tests proposed by the Wechsler Ladders allows to appreciate the level of cognitive development of the child and adolescents. Adults benefit from Adaptation French National Adult Reading Scale (fNART) which aims to estimate the intellectual pre-morbid level. It consists of a series of 40 words of the French language. The patient is asked to read each word aloud whether or not they know the word. It is therefore necessary to deduce the pronunciation of the word in question.
* Computerized neurocognitive tests o In children up to 10 years

KITAP computerized battery: 6 tests of this battery have been selected and are administered in the following order:
* alert
* divided attention
* flexibility
* go no go
* distractibility
* sustained attention o In children from 11 years old/teenagers/adults

Computer Battery TAP 2.2: 8 tests of this battery have been selected and are administered in the following order:
* phasic attention
* divided attention
* flexibility
* incompatibility
* go no go
* visual scan
* working memory
* sustained attention The total pass of these tests lasts approximately 45 minutes to which are added 5 minutes of explanation and test (s) for each task (5 x 8). Total duration of the TAP battery run: approximately 1h25.

• Other neurocognitive tests

o In children:
* Memory test
* 15 words of Rey
* Memory test - figures
* Dam tests
3. Standardized assessment of psychiatric comorbidities other than ADHD

\- In children-adolescents: Social Communication Questionnaire S.C.Q - Social Communication Questionnaire): A tool for identifying the manifestations of Autonomic Spectrum Disorders in three main functional areas: social relations, communication and restricted, stereotyped and repetitive behaviors. Hetero-quiz for parents or a person who knows the child well.

C.A.S.T The Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test: hetero-questionnaire to assess the manifestations of Asperger syndrome.

\- In adults: Semi-structured psychiatric interview. Questionnaire Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ): self-questionnaire "mood disorders" allowing screening for bipolar disorders
4. Standardized evaluation of oculomotor behavior Visually guided horizontal and vertical saccade tests: A fixation point is shown in the center of the screen, after a time interval of 200 ms, the center point disappears and a new point appears on the right or left at 20 ° from the initial position. The eyes must move on the new target. Thirty horizontal and 30 vertical saccades are presented Voluntary horizontal saccadic tests: The parameters are identical to those exposed in visually guided saccadic tests except that the central point does not disappear when the second point appears on the right or on the left (top or bottom) at 20 ° from the central point. Thirty horizontal saccades are presented.

Anti-saccadic tests: A fixation point is presented in the center of the screen, after an interval of 200ms, the central point disappears and a new point appears on the right or on the left (top or bottom) at 20 ° from the initial position. The eyes must be pointing away from the point. Thirty horizontal saccades are presented.

All oculomotor tests last 1 minute. Horizontal and vertical chase tests: A target moves on the screen for about 50 seconds, the eyes must follow the target. The speed of the target varies from 5 ° Reading and Visual Search Tests: A text of 4 lines is presented on the computer screen. The participants must read it in a low voice, the movements of the eyes are recorded while they perform the task.

In the visual search test, the same text is presented but all vowels are replaced by consonants. Participants must count in low voices the number of 'r' present in the text.
5. Other parameters collected Sociodemographic data, personal and family psychiatric and somatic antecedents as well as previous and current treatments are collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Interventional study designed to evaluate routine care. The patients are their own controls. Oculomotor and neurocognitive performances are assessed at baseline (V0), during the methylphenidate test (V1), and after 6 months of methylphenidate treatment
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ADHD patients

90 patients will be enrolled and assessed (i.e., neurocognitive and oculomotor tests) at baseline ; after a single low dose of methylphenidate (10 mg orally); and after 6 months of adequate dose of methylphenidate oral tablet

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Methylphenidate Oral Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

cf arm group description

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Methylphenidate Oral Tablet

cf arm group description

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

oculometry (eye tracking) neurocognition (TAP battery)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ADHD diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR criteria
* Beneficiary of a social security scheme
* Having undergone an oculomotor examination as part of their usual care
* Normal neurological examination

Exclusion Criteria

* Intellectual Disability (IQ \< 70)
* Proven neurological pathology or identified genetic syndrome
* Vestibular pathology
* Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) pathology
* Neuro-ophthalmological pathology uncorrected by corrective glass (\<10/10 in binocular vision
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Rouffach

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fabrice Duval

MD, Psychiatrist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fabrice Duval

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Rouffach

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Rouffach

Rouffach, Alsace, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fabrice Duval, MD

Role: CONTACT

33389787018

Alexis Erb, MD

Role: CONTACT

33389787018

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fabrice Duval, MD

Role: primary

33389787018

Alexis Erb, MD

Role: backup

33389787018

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Munoz DP, Armstrong IT, Hampton KA, Moore KD. Altered control of visual fixation and saccadic eye movements in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;90(1):503-14. doi: 10.1152/jn.00192.2003. Epub 2003 Apr 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12672781 (View on PubMed)

Kurscheidt JC, Peiler P, Behnken A, Abel S, Pedersen A, Suslow T, Deckert J. Acute effects of methylphenidate on neuropsychological parameters in adults with ADHD: possible relevance for therapy. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008;115(2):357-62. doi: 10.1007/s00702-008-0871-4. Epub 2008 Feb 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18264813 (View on PubMed)

Duval F, Erb A, Mokrani MC, Weiss T, Carcangiu R. First-Dose Methylphenidate-Induced Changes in the Anti-Saccade Task Performance and Outcome in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2021 May 19;3(4):146-152. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20210010. eCollection 2021 Winter.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36101656 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AO-005/20131104

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Motivation and Methylphenidate
NCT03190681 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1