Lumbar Plexus Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Primary Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT03409900

Last Updated: 2020-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-04

Study Completion Date

2019-11-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful orthopedic procedures to effectively relieve pain and restore function in patients with end stage osteoarthritis. In an attempt to accelerate recovery many orthopedic surgeons have opted to utilize a direct anterior approach (DAA) as opposed to the more traditional posterolateral approach (PLA). The literature supports that DAA is superior to PLA with regard to lower blood loss, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster rehabilitation. Traditionally the study team has performed Lumbar Plexus blocks (LPB) to provide post-operative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a newer regional analgesic technique that may be as effective as LPB at providing pain control following DAA hip arthroplasty. This study is designed to compare the efficacy, with regards to post-operative pain management, between LPB and QLB following a DAA total hip arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In an attempt to accelerate recovery many orthopedic surgeons have opted to utilize a direct anterior approach (DAA) as opposed to the more traditional posterolateral approach (PLA) in regards to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The DAA technique involves dissection of muscular planes for insertion of components resulting in less tissue damage as compared to PLA. Traditionally the study team has performed Lumbar Plexus blocks (LPB) to provide post-operative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty. This technique works well for the traditionally performed PLA in that the hip joint and incision site are within the analgesic distribution of the LPB. Conversely, the DAA utilizes an anterior incision that overlies the L1 and L2 dermatomes as opposed to the lower lumbar dermatomes of the PLA incision. When performing LPB it has been the study team's clinical experience that it is rare to achieve analgesia in the proximal distribution of the lumbar plexus resulting in apparent sparing of the L1 and L2 nerve root distributions. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a newer regional analgesic technique that may be as effective as LPB at providing pain control following DAA hip arthroplasty. The QLB is thought to provide analgesia by blocking both the lateral and anterior cutaneous branches of T7 through L4. This degree of dermatomal coverage suggests that QLB could be an efficacious alternative to LPB for DAA hip arthroplasty. It is hypothesized that the QLB will provide equivalent analgesia when compared to the LPB as determined by a comparison of verbal reported pain scores.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis Total Hip Arthroplasty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LPB Unilateral DAA THA

Patients will be randomized to receive either a LPB or QLB for post-operative analgesia. Randomization to either LPB or QLB will occur via block randomization using sealed sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that will correspond to the order with which patients are enrolled. Patients and research assistants will be blinded to their randomization by administration of intravenous sedation (titrated to patient comfort), utilization of ultrasonography to visualize pertinent structures for both blocks, and by the nature of the block technique themselves both being in close proximity on the posterior lower back.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LPB

Intervention Type OTHER

The LPB will be performed in a lateral position, but modified to utilize ultrasound guidance to enhance our ability to quickly and safely locate the lumbar plexus as well as to avoid unblinding with regard to the traditional landmark LPB technique. For both LPB and QLB a TOTAL DOSE of 20 cc of the following local anesthetic mixture will be administered: Ropivacaine 0.2% and Epinephrine - 2.5 mcg/cc (1:400,000 concentration).

QLB Unilateral DAA THA

Patients will be randomized to receive either a LPB or QLB for post-operative analgesia. Randomization to either LPB or QLB will occur via block randomization using sealed sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that will correspond to the order with which patients are enrolled. Patients and research assistants will be blinded to their randomization by administration of intravenous sedation (titrated to patient comfort), utilization of ultrasonography to visualize pertinent structures for both blocks, and by the nature of the block technique themselves both being in close proximity on the posterior lower back.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

QLB

Intervention Type OTHER

The QLB will be performed in a lateral position in a manner consistent with the technique first described by Børglum. For both LPB and QLB a TOTAL DOSE of 20 cc of the following local anesthetic mixture will be administered: Ropivacaine 0.2% and Epinephrine - 2.5 mcg/cc (1:400,000 concentration).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LPB

The LPB will be performed in a lateral position, but modified to utilize ultrasound guidance to enhance our ability to quickly and safely locate the lumbar plexus as well as to avoid unblinding with regard to the traditional landmark LPB technique. For both LPB and QLB a TOTAL DOSE of 20 cc of the following local anesthetic mixture will be administered: Ropivacaine 0.2% and Epinephrine - 2.5 mcg/cc (1:400,000 concentration).

Intervention Type OTHER

QLB

The QLB will be performed in a lateral position in a manner consistent with the technique first described by Børglum. For both LPB and QLB a TOTAL DOSE of 20 cc of the following local anesthetic mixture will be administered: Ropivacaine 0.2% and Epinephrine - 2.5 mcg/cc (1:400,000 concentration).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lumbar Plexus Block Quadratus Lumborum Block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient between the ages of 18 and 95 years undergoing a primary elective, unilateral DAA total hip arthroplasty.

Exclusion Criteria

* If the patient uses more than 40mg of Oxycodone equivalents per 24 hours or is on extended release opioid formulations.
* Indication for surgery is secondary to trauma and/or hip fracture
* If there is a contraindication to the performance of a regional block
* Concomitant anticoagulation use or documented coagulopathy
* Infectious or dermatologic conditions in the area of block placement that would otherwise increase the risk of peripheral nerve blockade
* Presence of progressive neurologic deficit effecting peripheral nerves
* Allergy or adverse reaction to study drugs to include: fentanyl, epinephrine, and amide local anesthetics
* American Society of Anesthesia Physical Classification score \> or = to 4
* Allergies to study drugs other than local anesthetic
* BMI \> 40
* Patient refusal
* Pregnancy
* Institutionalized individuals
* Extremes of age: Age \> 95 or \< 18
* Non English speaking or inability to reliably participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christopher J Edwards, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00048845

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Geriatric Distal Femur
NCT07237191 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
On-Table Versus Off-Table Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04831372 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA